Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2505.10468v5

In this comprehensive review, Sapkota et al. critically analyze the distinction between AI Agents and Agentic AI, providing a structured conceptual taxonomy, application mapping, and in-depth analysis of their divergent design philosophies and capabilities. The authors begin by outlining their search strategy and foundational definitions. They define AI Agents as modular systems driven by LLMs and LIMs for task-specific automation. They also position Generative AI as a precursor to AI agents, which advance through tool integration, prompt engineering, and reasoning enhancements. In contrast to AI Agents, Agentic AI systems represent a paradigm shift characterized by multi-agent collaboration, dynamic task decomposition, persistent memory, and coordinated autonomy. Through a chronological evaluation of architectural evolution, operational mechanisms, interaction styles, and autonomy levels across both paradigms the authors present a comparative analysis highlighting the unique features of each approach. The review further delves into application domains enabled by AI Agents such as customer support and data summarization compared to Agentic AI deployments in research automation and medical decision support. Unique challenges in each paradigm are explored including hallucination brittleness emergent behavior and coordination failure. The authors propose targeted solutions such as ReAct loops retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) automation coordination layers and causal modeling to address these challenges. Sapkota et al. 's work aims to provide a roadmap for developing robust scalable <kd>,</kbd> explainable AI-driven systems. The authors acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (NSF), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), as well as other funding sources for their research on artificial intelligence applications in agriculture. No data was used for the research described in the article. This review is published in Information Fusion 126 (2026) 103599.

• - AI Agents vs. Agentic AI:
• - AI Agents: driven by LLMs and LIMs for task-specific automation
• - Agentic AI: characterized by multi-agent collaboration, dynamic task decomposition, persistent memory, and coordinated autonomy
• - Evolution of Architectural Design:
• - Generative AI as a precursor to AI agents
• - Agentic AI represents a paradigm shift with unique features
• - Application Domains:
• - AI Agents: customer support and data summarization
• - Agentic AI: research automation and medical decision support
• - Challenges and Proposed Solutions:
• - Challenges include hallucination, brittleness, emergent behavior, and coordination failure
• - Proposed solutions include ReAct loops, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), automation coordination layers, and causal modeling
• - Aim of the Review:
• - Provide a roadmap for developing robust, scalable, explainable AI-driven systems
• - Acknowledgments:
• - Support from NSF, USDA, NIFA, and other funding sources mentioned

SummaryAI Agents are like robots that follow specific rules to do tasks, while Agentic AI is like a team of robots working together with memory and independence. Generative AI came before AI agents, but Agentic AI brings new ways of working. AI Agents help with customer service and summarizing data, while Agentic AI helps in research and medical decisions. Challenges for these AIs include mistakes and not working well together, but solutions like loops and better coordination are suggested. The aim of this review is to guide the creation of strong, scalable, understandable AI systems. Definitions- AI: Artificial Intelligence - technology that allows machines to learn from experience and perform tasks that typically require human intelligence. - Automation: Using technology to control processes without human intervention. - Collaboration: Working together towards a common goal. - Autonomy: Having the freedom to make independent decisions. - Paradigm Shift: A fundamental change in approach or underlying assumptions. - Scalable: Capable of being easily expanded or upgraded. - Explainable: Able to be understood or explained clearly.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been a rapidly growing field in recent years, with advancements and applications being made in various industries. One area of AI that has gained significant attention is the distinction between AI Agents and Agentic AI. In this comprehensive review, Sapkota et al. critically analyze these two paradigms, providing a structured conceptual taxonomy, application mapping, and in-depth analysis of their divergent design philosophies and capabilities. The authors begin by outlining their search strategy and foundational definitions. They define AI Agents as modular systems driven by Learning Logic Machines (LLMs) and Learning Interaction Machines (LIMs) for task-specific automation. These agents are designed to perform specific tasks efficiently without human intervention. The authors also position Generative AI as a precursor to AI Agents, which advance through tool integration, prompt engineering, and reasoning enhancements. In contrast to AI Agents, Agentic AI systems represent a paradigm shift characterized by multi-agent collaboration, dynamic task decomposition, persistent memory, and coordinated autonomy. This approach allows for more complex decision-making processes that involve multiple agents working together towards a common goal. Through a chronological evaluation of architectural evolution, operational mechanisms, interaction styles, and autonomy levels across both paradigms the authors present a comparative analysis highlighting the unique features of each approach. The review further delves into application domains enabled by AI Agents such as customer support and data summarization compared to Agentic AI deployments in research automation and medical decision support. This highlights how each paradigm is suited for different types of tasks based on their design philosophies. However, with any new technology comes challenges that need to be addressed for its successful implementation. The authors explore unique challenges in each paradigm including hallucination (incorrectly predicting outcomes), brittleness (inability to adapt to new situations), emergent behavior (unintended consequences), and coordination failure (communication breakdown between agents). To address these challenges effectively, Sapkota et al. propose targeted solutions such as ReAct loops, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), automation coordination layers, and causal modeling. These solutions aim to improve the robustness, scalability, and explainability of AI-driven systems. The authors' work aims to provide a roadmap for developing robust, scalable, and explainable AI-driven systems. This is crucial in today's world where AI is being integrated into various industries and applications. The ability to understand and explain how these systems make decisions is essential for their acceptance and trust among users. It is worth noting that Sapkota et al.'s research was supported by various funding sources including the National Science Foundation (NSF), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA). This highlights the importance of AI applications in agriculture and the potential impact it can have on this industry. In conclusion, Sapkota et al.'s comprehensive review provides valuable insights into the distinction between AI Agents and Agentic AI. Their analysis highlights the unique features of each approach while also addressing challenges that need to be overcome for successful implementation. This review serves as a valuable resource for researchers, developers, and policymakers working in the field of artificial intelligence.