Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2504.07100v1

In their paper titled "EnDive: A Cross-Dialect Benchmark for Fairness and Performance in Large Language Models," authors Abhay Gupta, Jacob Cheung, Philip Meng, Shayan Sayyed, Austen Liao, Kevin Zhu, and Sean O'Brien address the challenges posed by the diversity of human language on natural language processing (NLP) systems. They highlight how existing benchmarks often fail to account for intra-language variations, thereby neglecting speakers of non-standard dialects. To bridge this gap, the authors introduce EnDive (English Diversity), a comprehensive benchmark that assesses the performance of five popular large language models (LLMs) across various tasks such as language understanding, algorithmic reasoning, mathematics, and logic. The framework developed by the authors involves translating datasets from Standard American English into five underrepresented dialects using few-shot prompting techniques with input from native speakers to ensure accuracy. These translations are then compared against rule-based methods through fluency assessments, preference tests, and semantic similarity metrics. Human evaluations validate the high translation quality achieved by EnDive, with average scores exceeding 6 out of 7 for faithfulness, fluency, and formality. By curating a challenging dataset that exposes significant disparities in performance between standard American English inputs and dialectal inputs across different large language models, EnDive sheds light on inherent biases within these systems. The findings underscore the need for more equitable and dialect-aware NLP technologies. Through their research efforts, the authors aim to promote inclusivity and fairness in language processing technologies by uncovering model biases and advocating for advancements in this field.

• - Authors address challenges of diversity in human language on NLP systems
• - Existing benchmarks often overlook intra-language variations and neglect non-standard dialects
• - Introduction of EnDive benchmark to assess LLM performance across various tasks
• - Translation of datasets into underrepresented dialects using few-shot prompting techniques with input from native speakers
• - Comparison against rule-based methods through fluency assessments, preference tests, and semantic similarity metrics
• - Human evaluations validate high translation quality achieved by EnDive
• - EnDive exposes significant disparities in performance between standard American English inputs and dialectal inputs across different large language models, highlighting inherent biases within these systems
• - Research aims to promote inclusivity and fairness in language processing technologies by uncovering model biases and advocating for advancements

Summary- Authors are looking at how different languages and dialects can be better understood by computer systems. - Some tests that are currently used don't consider all the different ways people speak a language. - A new test called EnDive is being introduced to see how well computer programs understand language. - By using special techniques, datasets in less common dialects are being translated with help from native speakers. - EnDive is compared to other methods to see which one does a better job at translating and understanding language. Definitions- Diversity: The state of being different or having variety. - Benchmark: A standard or point of reference for comparison. - Dialect: A form of a language spoken in a particular region or by a particular group of people. - Fluency: The ability to speak or write smoothly and easily without stopping or hesitating. - Preference: A liking for one thing over another.

Introduction

Natural language processing (NLP) has made significant strides in recent years, with the development of large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-3 and BERT. These models have shown impressive performance on various tasks, including language understanding, algorithmic reasoning, mathematics, and logic. However, one major challenge that remains is the diversity of human language. While these LLMs excel at handling standard American English inputs, they often struggle with non-standard dialects. In their paper titled "EnDive: A Cross-Dialect Benchmark for Fairness and Performance in Large Language Models," authors Abhay Gupta et al. address this issue by introducing a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates the performance of LLMs across different dialects. This article will provide an overview of their research paper and discuss its implications for promoting inclusivity and fairness in NLP technologies.

The Need for Dialect-Aware NLP Technologies

The authors highlight how existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs often neglect intra-language variations and focus solely on standard American English inputs. This approach fails to account for speakers of non-standard dialects who may face difficulties using these technologies due to linguistic differences. Moreover, studies have shown that LLMs trained on standard American English data can exhibit biases towards certain groups or demographics when applied to other dialectal inputs. For example, a study found that Google's BERT model showed higher error rates when processing African-American Vernacular English compared to Standard American English. These issues highlight the need for more equitable and dialect-aware NLP technologies that can accurately process diverse forms of human language without perpetuating biases.

The EnDive Framework

To bridge this gap in current benchmarks and promote fair evaluation of LLMs across different dialectal inputs, the authors introduce EnDive (English Diversity). This framework involves translating datasets from Standard American English into five underrepresented dialects: African-American Vernacular English, Appalachian English, Hawaiian Pidgin, Indian English, and Singaporean English. The authors use few-shot prompting techniques to generate these translations with input from native speakers of each dialect to ensure accuracy. These translations are then compared against rule-based methods through fluency assessments, preference tests, and semantic similarity metrics.

Translation Quality Evaluation

To validate the high translation quality achieved by EnDive, the authors conducted human evaluations with 20 participants for each dialect. The results showed that EnDive outperformed rule-based methods in terms of faithfulness (how well the translated text preserves the meaning of the original), fluency (how natural and grammatically correct the translated text is), and formality (how appropriate the translated text is for a given context). On average, EnDive received scores exceeding 6 out of 7 for all three metrics across all five dialects. This demonstrates its effectiveness in accurately translating standard American English inputs into different non-standard dialects.

Uncovering Biases in LLMs

The EnDive benchmark also exposes significant disparities in performance between standard American English inputs and dialectal inputs across different LLMs. For example, while GPT-3 performed well on most tasks when processing standard American English inputs, it struggled with certain tasks when presented with non-standard dialectal inputs. These findings highlight inherent biases within LLMs towards specific forms of language and underscore the need for more inclusive and equitable NLP technologies.

Implications for Fairness in NLP Technologies

Through their research efforts, Gupta et al. aim to promote inclusivity and fairness in language processing technologies by uncovering model biases and advocating for advancements in this field. The EnDive framework provides a comprehensive benchmark that can be used to evaluate future LLM models' performance across different dialects. Moreover, the authors' approach of involving native speakers in the translation process ensures accuracy and authenticity, making EnDive a valuable resource for researchers and developers working towards more equitable NLP technologies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, "EnDive: A Cross-Dialect Benchmark for Fairness and Performance in Large Language Models" addresses the challenges posed by the diversity of human language on NLP systems. By introducing a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates LLMs across various tasks and dialectal inputs, the authors shed light on inherent biases within these systems and advocate for more inclusive and fair NLP technologies. The EnDive framework serves as an important step towards promoting inclusivity in language processing technologies by providing a means to evaluate model performance across diverse forms of language. As this field continues to evolve, it is crucial to consider the impact of linguistic diversity and strive towards developing more equitable NLP technologies.