Don't Let It Hallucinate: Premise Verification via Retrieval-Augmented Logical Reasoning

AI-generated keywords: Large language models Hallucinated outputs Premise verification Retrieval-augmented logical reasoning False premises

AI-generated Key Points

  • Authors address the issue of hallucinated outputs in large language models (LLMs) due to false premises in user queries
  • Existing approaches rely on post-generation techniques that are computationally expensive and lack proactive mechanisms
  • Proposed retrieval-based framework identifies and addresses false premises before generation using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
  • Method involves transforming a user's query into a logical representation and assessing premise validity using factual sources
  • Verification results are incorporated into the LLM's prompt to ensure factual consistency in the final output
  • Experimental results show reduction in hallucinations, improved factual accuracy without requiring access to model logits or extensive fine-tuning
  • Framework achieves high true positive rates, true negative rates, F1 scores, and overall accuracy by implementing logical forms for retrieval and original queries for false premise detection
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yuehan Qin, Shawn Li, Yi Nian, Xinyan Velocity Yu, Yue Zhao, Xuezhe Ma

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown substantial capacity for generating fluent, contextually appropriate responses. However, they can produce hallucinated outputs, especially when a user query includes one or more false premises-claims that contradict established facts. Such premises can mislead LLMs into offering fabricated or misleading details. Existing approaches include pretraining, fine-tuning, and inference-time techniques that often rely on access to logits or address hallucinations after they occur. These methods tend to be computationally expensive, require extensive training data, or lack proactive mechanisms to prevent hallucination before generation, limiting their efficiency in real-time applications. We propose a retrieval-based framework that identifies and addresses false premises before generation. Our method first transforms a user's query into a logical representation, then applies retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to assess the validity of each premise using factual sources. Finally, we incorporate the verification results into the LLM's prompt to maintain factual consistency in the final output. Experiments show that this approach effectively reduces hallucinations, improves factual accuracy, and does not require access to model logits or large-scale fine-tuning.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Apr. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2504.06438v1

In their paper titled "Don't Let It Hallucinate: Premise Verification via Retrieval-Augmented Logical Reasoning," authors Yuehan Qin, Shawn Li, Yi Nian, Xinyan Velocity Yu, Yue Zhao, and Xuezhe Ma address the issue of hallucinated outputs in large language models (LLMs) when faced with false premises in user queries. These false premises can lead LLMs to generate fabricated or misleading information. Existing approaches to tackle this problem often rely on post-generation techniques that are computationally expensive and lack proactive mechanisms. To combat this issue, the authors propose a retrieval-based framework that identifies and addresses false premises before generation. The method involves transforming a user's query into a logical representation and using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to assess the validity of each premise using factual sources. The verification results are then incorporated into the LLM's prompt to ensure factual consistency in the final output. Experimental results demonstrate that this approach effectively reduces hallucinations, improves factual accuracy, and does not require access to model logits or extensive fine-tuning. By implementing logical forms for retrieval and original queries for false premise detection, the framework achieves high true positive rates, true negative rates, F1 scores, and overall accuracy. Overall,this innovative approach offers a promising solution to mitigating hallucinations in LLM-generated responses by proactively addressing false premises through logical reasoning and retrieval-based verification methods.
Created on 13 Apr. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.