The field of is rapidly evolving and there is a pressing need to balance technical innovation with methodological rigor. A recent of 52 articles from 2022-2024 sheds light on key findings and challenges in this area. The review highlights that closed commercial models dominate persona development, leading to a lack of Additionally, Generative AI (GenAI) plays a crucial role in various stages of persona development, including data collection, segmentation, enrichment, and evaluation. Despite the potential of AI-generated personas, there are significant gaps in their evaluation compared to traditional quantitative persona development techniques. Human-AI collaboration models also require further refinement to ensure ethical standards are maintained. The review underscores the importance of collaborative efforts between academia and industry to fully realize the benefits of AI-generated personas. Moving forward, future research should prioritize developing standardized evaluation frameworks, enhancing transparency and reproducibility, expanding applications into underserved domains, and refining human-AI collaboration models. By drawing inspiration from established quantitative persona science principles and exploring new frontiers beyond software development and marketing, AI-generated personas can transition from a technological novelty to a robust and socially beneficial research paradigm. Furthermore, it is suggested that future research could delve deeper into specific aspects such as the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in different stages of persona development and incorporate additional variables like the number of personas generated and the framework used for evaluation. By addressing these areas for improvement and embracing interdisciplinary perspectives from fields like Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Natural Language Processing (NLP), the field of AI-generated personas can continue to evolve towards greater maturity and societal impact.
- - The field of AI-generated personas is rapidly evolving, emphasizing the need to balance technical innovation with methodological rigor.
- - Closed commercial models dominate persona development, leading to a lack of diversity.
- - Generative AI (GenAI) is crucial in various stages of persona development but lacks comprehensive evaluation compared to traditional techniques.
- - Human-AI collaboration models require further refinement for maintaining ethical standards.
- - Collaborative efforts between academia and industry are essential for realizing the benefits of AI-generated personas.
- - Future research should focus on developing standardized evaluation frameworks, enhancing transparency and reproducibility, expanding applications into underserved domains, and refining human-AI collaboration models.
- - Delving deeper into specific aspects like the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in persona development and incorporating additional variables can further improve AI-generated personas.
- - Embracing interdisciplinary perspectives from fields like Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) can contribute to the evolution of AI-generated personas towards greater maturity and societal impact.
Summary1. AI-generated personas are characters created by computers that are getting better and need to be carefully balanced with rules.
2. Most persona development is done by companies, which can make them all look the same.
3. Special computer programs called GenAI are important for making personas but need more testing.
4. People and computers working together need to keep being improved to do things right.
5. Schools and businesses working together are very important for making AI personas work well.
Definitions- AI (Artificial Intelligence): Computers doing smart things like thinking and learning on their own.
- Persona: A made-up character or personality used in stories or research.
- Rigor: Doing things carefully and following rules strictly.
- Generative AI (GenAI): Computer programs that can create new things on their own, like characters or ideas.
- Ethical standards: Rules about what is right or wrong in how people and computers work together.
- Interdisciplinary: Involving different fields of study or expertise coming together to solve problems.
The field of persona development is rapidly evolving, driven by the increasing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Generative AI (GenAI). As technology continues to advance, there is a pressing need to balance technical innovation with methodological rigor in order to fully realize the potential benefits of AI-generated personas. A recent review of 52 articles from 2022-2024 sheds light on key findings and challenges in this area, highlighting the dominance of closed commercial models and the lack of standardized evaluation frameworks.
One major finding from the review is that closed commercial models dominate persona development. This means that most personas are being developed within organizations or companies for their own specific purposes, rather than being shared openly for research or collaboration. While this may be beneficial for individual businesses, it can lead to a lack of diversity and transparency in persona development overall. This highlights the need for more open and collaborative approaches in order to ensure a well-rounded understanding of personas.
Another important aspect highlighted by the review is the role of GenAI in various stages of persona development. From data collection to segmentation, enrichment, and evaluation, GenAI plays a crucial role in streamlining and automating these processes. However, there are significant gaps in evaluating AI-generated personas compared to traditional quantitative techniques used for persona development. This raises questions about reliability and validity when using AI-generated personas.
Moreover, ethical considerations also come into play when utilizing GenAI for persona development. The review emphasizes the importance of refining human-AI collaboration models to ensure ethical standards are maintained throughout all stages of persona creation. Collaboration between academia and industry will be essential in addressing these concerns and developing responsible practices.
Moving forward, future research should prioritize developing standardized evaluation frameworks for AI-generated personas. These frameworks should take into account not only traditional quantitative measures but also incorporate qualitative aspects such as user feedback and satisfaction levels. Additionally, transparency and reproducibility must be enhanced through clear documentation and open sharing of data and methods.
The review also suggests expanding the applications of AI-generated personas into underserved domains. While most research in this area has focused on software development and marketing, there is potential for personas to be used in a wide range of fields such as healthcare, education, and social sciences. By exploring these new frontiers, AI-generated personas can have a greater societal impact beyond just business purposes.
In order to fully realize the benefits of AI-generated personas, it is crucial to draw inspiration from established quantitative persona science principles while also exploring new frontiers. This requires interdisciplinary perspectives from fields like Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Natural Language Processing (NLP). By incorporating these perspectives, the field of AI-generated personas can continue to evolve towards greater maturity and societal impact.
Furthermore, future research could delve deeper into specific aspects such as the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in different stages of persona development. LLMs are powerful tools that can generate large amounts of text based on input data. Incorporating LLMs into persona development could potentially improve the accuracy and diversity of generated personas. Additionally, considering variables such as the number of personas generated and the framework used for evaluation could provide further insights into the effectiveness and limitations of using AI for persona development.
In conclusion, while there are still challenges to overcome in developing reliable and ethical AI-generated personas, it is clear that this field has immense potential for both businesses and society as a whole. By addressing areas for improvement highlighted by recent research reviews and embracing interdisciplinary perspectives, we can ensure that AI-generated personas transition from a technological novelty to a robust research paradigm with significant societal impact.