Agentic Business Process Management: Practitioner Perspectives on Agent Governance in Business Processes

AI-generated keywords: AI agents agentic business process management governance risks integration

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Growing interest in software agents driven by generative AI
  • Stochastic AI-based agents require robust governance for safe deployment
  • Uncertainty among BPM practitioners regarding what qualifies as an agent and associated benefits, risks, and challenges
  • Anticipated benefits of AI agents: improved efficiency, data quality, compliance, scalability through automation
  • Potential risks of AI agents: bias, over-reliance, cybersecurity threats, job displacement, ambiguous decision-making
  • Six key recommendations for responsible adoption of AI agents:
  • Defining clear business goals
  • Setting legal and ethical guardrails
  • Fostering human-agent collaboration
  • Customizing agent behavior
  • Managing risks effectively
  • Ensuring safe integration with fallback options
  • Actions to align traditional BPM practices with agentic AI:
  • Balancing human and agent roles
  • Redefining human involvement in processes
  • Adapting structures accordingly
  • Introducing performance metrics
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Hoang Vu, Nataliia Klievtsova, Henrik Leopold, Stefanie Rinderle-Ma, Timotheus Kampik

Accepted for Responsible BPM 2025, 15 pages including references

Abstract: With the rise of generative AI, industry interest in software agents is growing. Given the stochastic nature of generative AI-based agents, their effective and safe deployment in organizations requires robust governance, which can be facilitated by agentic business process management. However, given the nascence of this new-generation agent notion, it is not clear what BPM practitioners consider to be an agent, and what benefits, risks and governance challenges they associate with agent deployments. To investigate how organizations can effectively govern AI agents, we conducted a qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews with 22 BPM practitioners from diverse industries. They anticipate that agents will enhance efficiency, improve data quality, ensure better compliance, and boost scalability through automation, while also cautioning against risks such as bias, over-reliance, cybersecurity threats, job displacement, and ambiguous decision-making. To address these challenges, the study presents six key recommendations for the responsible adoption of AI agents: define clear business goals, set legal and ethical guardrails, establish human-agent collaboration, customize agent behavior, manage risks, and ensure safe integration with fallback options. Additionally, the paper outlines actions to align traditional BPM with agentic AI, including balancing human and agent roles, redefining human involvement, adapting process structures, and introducing performance metrics. These insights provide a practical foundation for integrating AI agents into business processes while preserving oversight, flexibility, and trust.

Submitted to arXiv on 23 Mar. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2504.03693v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The study "Agentic Business Process Management: Practitioner Perspectives on Agent Governance in Business Processes" explores the growing interest in software agents driven by the emergence of generative AI. These stochastic AI-based agents require robust governance for effective and safe deployment within organizations. The concept of agentic business process management serves as a facilitator for this governance, but there is still uncertainty among BPM practitioners regarding what qualifies as an agent and the associated benefits, risks, and challenges. To shed light on how organizations can govern AI agents effectively, a qualitative study was conducted involving 22 BPM practitioners from various industries. These experts anticipate that AI agents will improve efficiency, data quality, compliance, and scalability through automation. However, they also caution against potential risks such as bias, over-reliance, cybersecurity threats, job displacement, and ambiguous decision-making. In response to these challenges, six key recommendations are proposed for responsible adoption of AI agents: defining clear business goals; setting legal and ethical guardrails; fostering human-agent collaboration; customizing agent behavior; managing risks effectively; and ensuring safe integration with fallback options. Additionally, the paper outlines actions to align traditional BPM practices with agentic AI by balancing human and agent roles; redefining human involvement in processes; adapting structures accordingly; and introducing performance metrics. These insights provide a practical foundation for integrating AI agents into business processes while maintaining oversight mechanisms that preserve flexibility and trust. By proactively addressing concerns surrounding governance issues related to AI agents through these recommendations and actions outlined in the study's findings offer valuable guidance for organizations navigating the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence integration in their operations.
Created on 07 Jul. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.