In the field of , existing systems have benefited from large language models (LLMs) but face limitations in slow and quick reasoning modes. Slow thinking involves exploring every possible reasoning path, leading to overthinking, while quick thinking relies on pattern matching and lacks true understanding. To address these challenges, a novel framework called is proposed. This method adjusts reasoning depth based on question complexity, leveraging synthetic reference QA examples to guide the model's own reasoning process. FReM balances quick-thinking and slow-thinking approaches by offering flexible reasoning steps. It dynamically decides whether to use simple or detailed pathways for handling single-step and multi-hop questions efficiently. Experimental results demonstrate that FReM outperforms quick-thinking models by capturing deeper logic beyond pattern matching and surpasses slow-thinking models by reducing unnecessary exploration. In the context of LCQA, previous works have utilized strategies such as RAG-based retrieval, iterative planning-retrieval-generation, and coreference resolution. However, these methods may become inefficient or overly complex for low-complexity questions. Additionally, different thinking strategies for QA systems include quick-thinking approaches that match patterns in input data and slow-thinking methods that focus on extended reasoning processes. The proposed introduces a dynamic mechanism to adapt reasoning complexity to the demands of each question. By synthesizing different reference demos to guide the model's own reasoning process, FReM offers self-directed and flexible reasoning steps for efficient handling of both simple and complex queries in LCQA tasks. This approach helps models move beyond superficial pattern matching and prevents unnecessary exploration during lengthy reasoning paths. Overall, FReM demonstrates improved reasoning accuracy and scalability across seven QA datasets, particularly enhancing performance on complex multihop questions in Long-Context Question Answering tasks. This innovative framework shows promise in advancing LCQA methodologies by balancing quick and slow thinking strategies effectively.
- - Existing systems in the field of question answering benefit from large language models (LLMs) but face limitations in slow and quick reasoning modes.
- - Slow thinking involves exploring every possible reasoning path, leading to overthinking, while quick thinking relies on pattern matching and lacks true understanding.
- - A novel framework called FReM is proposed to address these challenges by adjusting reasoning depth based on question complexity.
- - FReM leverages synthetic reference QA examples to guide the model's own reasoning process and balances quick-thinking and slow-thinking approaches by offering flexible reasoning steps.
- - Experimental results demonstrate that FReM outperforms quick-thinking models by capturing deeper logic beyond pattern matching and surpasses slow-thinking models by reducing unnecessary exploration.
- - Different thinking strategies for QA systems include quick-thinking approaches that match patterns in input data and slow-thinking methods that focus on extended reasoning processes.
- - FReM introduces a dynamic mechanism to adapt reasoning complexity to the demands of each question, offering self-directed and flexible reasoning steps for efficient handling of both simple and complex queries in LCQA tasks.
- - The approach helps models move beyond superficial pattern matching and prevents unnecessary exploration during lengthy reasoning paths, demonstrating improved accuracy and scalability across seven QA datasets.
SummaryExisting systems in question answering use large language models (LLMs) but struggle with slow and quick thinking modes. Slow thinking involves exploring all possible paths, leading to overthinking, while quick thinking relies on matching patterns without true understanding. A new framework called FReM adjusts reasoning depth based on question complexity to balance quick and slow thinking. FReM uses synthetic examples to guide reasoning and offers flexible steps for efficient processing of simple and complex queries. Experimental results show FReM outperforms other models by capturing deeper logic and reducing unnecessary exploration.
Definitions- Language Models (LLMs): Advanced computer programs that understand and generate human language.
- Overthinking: Spending too much time considering all possibilities without reaching a clear solution.
- Pattern Matching: Identifying similarities or common features between different pieces of information.
- Reasoning Depth: How deeply a system explores different paths to arrive at an answer.
- Synthetic Examples: Artificially created instances used to guide the learning process in models.
Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly popular in the field of natural language processing, providing powerful tools for various tasks such as question answering (QA). However, these systems often face limitations in their reasoning abilities. On one hand, slow thinking involves exploring every possible reasoning path, leading to overthinking and inefficiency. On the other hand, quick thinking relies on pattern matching and lacks true understanding of complex questions.
To address these challenges, a team of researchers has proposed a novel framework called Flexible Reasoning Mechanism (FReM). This method aims to balance quick-thinking and slow-thinking approaches by offering flexible reasoning steps that adjust based on the complexity of the question at hand.
The Need for FReM
Existing QA systems have shown great success with large language models but still struggle with handling complex questions efficiently. Slow thinking methods involve exhaustive exploration of all possible paths to find an answer, which can be time-consuming and lead to overthinking. Quick thinking approaches rely heavily on pattern matching and may miss important details or fail to understand the underlying logic behind a question.
In order to overcome these limitations and improve overall performance in QA tasks, there is a need for a more balanced approach that combines both quick-thinking and slow-thinking strategies effectively.
Introducing FReM
The Flexible Reasoning Mechanism (FReM) is designed to dynamically adapt its reasoning depth based on the complexity of each question. It leverages synthetic reference QA examples to guide its own reasoning process, allowing it to make self-directed decisions about whether to use simple or detailed pathways for handling single-step or multi-hop questions efficiently.
This approach helps models move beyond superficial pattern matching and prevents unnecessary exploration during lengthy reasoning paths. By synthesizing different reference demos, FReM offers flexible reasoning steps that strike a balance between quick thinking and slow thinking strategies.
How FReM Works
FReM consists of three main components: 1) Reference QA Examples, 2) Reasoning Depth Adjustment, and 3) Dynamic Reasoning Steps.
1. Reference QA Examples: FReM utilizes synthetic reference QA examples to guide its own reasoning process. These examples are generated by combining different question templates with relevant context passages from the dataset. This allows FReM to learn from a diverse set of reference demos and adapt its reasoning approach accordingly.
2. Reasoning Depth Adjustment: FReM adjusts its reasoning depth based on the complexity of each question. For simple questions that require only one-step reasoning, it uses a quick-thinking approach by matching patterns in the input data. However, for more complex multi-hop questions, it employs a slow-thinking strategy by exploring multiple reasoning paths.
3. Dynamic Reasoning Steps: Based on the complexity of the question at hand, FReM dynamically decides whether to use simple or detailed pathways for handling single-step and multi-hop questions efficiently. This helps prevent overthinking in simple questions and ensures deeper logic is captured in complex ones.
Experimental Results
To evaluate the effectiveness of FReM, the researchers conducted experiments on seven different QA datasets including Long-Context Question Answering (LCQA) tasks. They compared FReM's performance against other state-of-the-art methods such as RAG-based retrieval, iterative planning-retrieval-generation, and coreference resolution strategies.
The results showed that FReM outperformed quick-thinking models by capturing deeper logic beyond pattern matching and surpassed slow-thinking models by reducing unnecessary exploration during lengthy reasoning paths. In particular, it demonstrated significant improvements in handling complex multihop questions in LCQA tasks.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Flexible Reasoning Mechanism (FReM) offers a promising solution for balancing quick-thinking and slow-thinking approaches in natural language processing tasks such as question answering. By adapting its reasoning depth based on question complexity and leveraging synthetic reference QA examples to guide its own process, FReM shows improved accuracy and scalability across various datasets. This innovative framework has the potential to advance LCQA methodologies and improve overall performance in natural language processing tasks.