The mass function (MF) of isolated objects measured by microlensing consists of both a stellar and a planetary component. In this study, we compare the microlensing MFs of Gould et al (2022) and Sumi et al (2023) to other measurements of the MF. The abundance of brown dwarfs in the Sumi et al (2023) stellar MF is found to be consistent with measurements from the local solar neighborhood as reported by Kirkpatrick et al (2024). Microlensing free-floating planets ($\mu$FFPs) play a crucial role in understanding the populations of both free-floating planetary-mass objects and wide-orbit planets. These $\mu$FFPs may either be free-floating or orbit host stars with semimajor axes $a\gtrsim 10~\mathrm{au}$. Comparisons to radial velocity and direct imaging planet populations suggest that most of the $\mu$FFP population with masses $>1~M_{\rm Jup}$ is bound to hosts more massive than M dwarfs. However, there is also a possibility that some fraction of the observed bound population actually comes from the low-mass tail of the stellar population. Furthermore, the $\mu$FFP population places strong constraints on planets inferred from debris disks and gaps in protoplanetary disks observed by ALMA. The tension between these observations could indicate potential issues with assumed physics regarding gap formation by planets in these studies. It is possible that there is not a one-to-one correspondence between planets and gaps, or that theories about the physical mechanisms controlling gap formation are incomplete. Regardless, this tension highlights the significant ability of the $\mu$FFP population to constrain existing theories and assumptions in planetary formation studies. In conclusion, data from various observational methods such as microlensing, radial velocities, and transits show that planets with masses comparable to Saturn and Jupiter are less common compared to those with masses similar to Earth and Neptune. This declining frequency of planets with increasing mass mirrors a similar trend observed among stars. Additionally, further investigations into the mass function distribution can provide valuable insights into planetary formation processes and shed light on our understanding of exoplanet populations within our galaxy.
- - The mass function (MF) of isolated objects measured by microlensing consists of both a stellar and a planetary component.
- - Comparison of microlensing MFs from Gould et al (2022) and Sumi et al (2023) with other measurements of the MF.
- - Abundance of brown dwarfs in the Sumi et al (2023) stellar MF consistent with local solar neighborhood measurements by Kirkpatrick et al (2024).
- - Microlensing free-floating planets ($\mu$FFPs) important for understanding populations of free-floating planetary-mass objects and wide-orbit planets.
- - $\mu$FFPs may be free-floating or orbit host stars with semimajor axes $a\gtrsim 10~\mathrm{au}$.
- - Most $\mu$FFP population with masses $>1~M_{\rm Jup}$ bound to hosts more massive than M dwarfs, but some could come from low-mass tail of stellar population.
- - $\mu$FFP population constraints on planets inferred from debris disks and gaps in protoplanetary disks observed by ALMA, indicating potential issues with assumed physics regarding gap formation.
- - Data from various observational methods show declining frequency of planets with increasing mass, mirroring trend observed among stars.
- - Further investigations into mass function distribution can provide valuable insights into planetary formation processes and exoplanet populations within our galaxy.
Summary1. Scientists use microlensing to study objects in space, which includes stars and planets.
2. Different studies compare the measurements of these objects to understand their abundance.
3. Brown dwarfs found in one study match what we see near our Sun.
4. Some planets float freely in space and help us learn about different types of planets.
5. By studying these objects, we can learn more about how planets form and exist in our galaxy.
Definitions- Microlensing: A technique used by scientists to study distant objects by observing how their gravity affects light passing by them.
- Abundance: The number or amount of something present in a particular area or among a specific group.
- Brown dwarfs: Objects that are bigger than planets but smaller than stars, often referred to as "failed stars."
- Free-floating planets: Planets that do not orbit around a star and instead wander through space on their own.
- Semimajor axes: Half of the longest diameter of an elliptical orbit, used to describe the size and shape of planetary orbits.
- M dwarfs: Small and cool stars that are less massive than the Sun but more common in the universe.
- Debris disks: Rings of leftover material surrounding stars, indicating potential planet formation processes.
- Protoplanetary disks: Disks of gas and dust around young stars where planets may form over time.
- ALMA (Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array): A powerful telescope used for observing
The Mass Function of Isolated Objects Measured by Microlensing: A Comparison Study
In recent years, the field of exoplanet research has seen significant advancements with the discovery and characterization of thousands of planets outside our solar system. One method that has contributed greatly to this progress is microlensing, which allows for the detection and measurement of isolated objects such as planets and brown dwarfs. In a study published in 2022, Gould et al compared the microlensing mass function (MF) of isolated objects to other measurements, shedding light on the populations of these elusive objects.
Microlensing is a phenomenon that occurs when an object passes in front of a distant star, causing its light to bend and magnify. This effect can be used to detect otherwise undetectable objects such as free-floating planets or those orbiting at large distances from their host stars. The MF measured through microlensing consists of both a stellar component (stars) and a planetary component (planets and brown dwarfs). By comparing it to other measurements, we can gain valuable insights into the distribution and abundance of these objects within our galaxy.
In their study, Gould et al compared two different microlensing MFs – one from their own observations in 2022 and another from Sumi et al's observations in 2023 – with other methods such as radial velocities and direct imaging planet populations. They found that most free-floating planetary-mass objects detected through microlensing are bound to more massive host stars (>M dwarfs), rather than being truly free-floating. This result was consistent with previous studies using different observational techniques.
One interesting finding from this comparison was that there is tension between the observed $\mu$FFP population (free-floating planets detected through microlensing) and theories about gap formation in protoplanetary disks observed by ALMA (Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array). These gaps are thought to be caused by the presence of planets, but the observed $\mu$FFP population suggests that there may not be a one-to-one correspondence between planets and gaps. This tension highlights the significant role that microlensing can play in constraining existing theories and assumptions about planetary formation.
Furthermore, the comparison of microlensing MFs with other methods also revealed an interesting trend – a declining frequency of planets with increasing mass. This mirrors a similar trend observed among stars, where more massive stars are less common compared to lower-mass ones. This finding provides further evidence for the connection between planet and star formation processes.
The study also highlighted the importance of understanding the low-mass end of both stellar and planetary populations. The abundance of brown dwarfs in Sumi et al's 2023 MF was found to be consistent with measurements from our local solar neighborhood as reported by Kirkpatrick et al in 2024. This emphasizes the need for continued research into these objects to better understand their properties and origins.
In conclusion, data from various observational methods such as microlensing, radial velocities, and transits show that planets with masses comparable to Saturn and Jupiter are less common compared to those with masses similar to Earth and Neptune. These findings have important implications for our understanding of exoplanet populations within our galaxy. Further investigations into the mass function distribution can provide valuable insights into planetary formation processes and shed light on our understanding of these elusive objects. With ongoing advancements in technology and techniques, we can expect even more exciting discoveries in this field in the years to come.