LLMs' Reshaping of People, Processes, Products, and Society in Software Development: A Comprehensive Exploration with Early Adopters

AI-generated keywords: software development large language models LLMs real-world contexts early adopters

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and GitHub Copilot are gaining traction in software development.
  • Lack of in-depth qualitative assessments on how LLMs are utilized in real-world software engineering contexts.
  • Study conducted with sixteen early-adopter professional developers to explore the impact of LLMs across various stages of the software development life cycle.
  • Four key dimensions examined: people, process, product, and society.
  • LLMs greatly enhance routine coding tasks such as code generation, refactoring, and debugging.
  • Clear problem statements lead to optimal results when using LLMs.
  • Significant values for using LLMs include facilitating learning new languages and concepts within software engineering.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Benyamin Tabarsi, Heidi Reichert, Ally Limke, Sandeep Kuttal, Tiffany Barnes

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and GitHub Copilot are rapidly gaining traction in the software industry, but their full impact on software engineering remains insufficiently explored. Despite their growing adoption, there is a notable lack of formal, qualitative assessments of how LLMs are applied in real-world software development contexts. To fill this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with sixteen early-adopter professional developers to explore their use of LLMs throughout various stages of the software development life cycle. Our investigation examines four dimensions: people - how LLMs affect individual developers and teams; process - how LLMs alter software engineering workflows; product - LLM impact on software quality and innovation; and society - the broader socioeconomic and ethical implications of LLM adoption. Thematic analysis of our data reveals that while LLMs have not fundamentally revolutionized the development process, they have substantially enhanced routine coding tasks, including code generation, refactoring, and debugging. Developers reported the most effective outcomes when providing LLMs with clear, well-defined problem statements, indicating that LLMs excel with decomposed problems and specific requirements. Furthermore, these early-adopters identified that LLMs offer significant value for personal and professional development, aiding in learning new languages and concepts. Early-adopters, highly skilled in software engineering and how LLMs work, identified early and persisting challenges for software engineering, such as inaccuracies in generated content and the need for careful manual review before integrating LLM outputs into production environments. Our study provides a nuanced understanding of how LLMs are shaping the landscape of software development, with their benefits, limitations, and ongoing implications.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Mar. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2503.05012v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the rapidly evolving landscape of software development, large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and GitHub Copilot are gaining significant traction. Despite their increasing adoption, there is a lack of in-depth qualitative assessments on how LLMs are utilized in real-world software engineering contexts. To address this gap, a study was conducted involving semi-structured interviews with sixteen early-adopter professional developers. The research focused on exploring the impact of LLMs across various stages of the software development life cycle, examining four key dimensions: people, process, product, and society. The findings from the investigation revealed that while LLMs have not brought about a fundamental revolution in the development process, they have greatly enhanced routine coding tasks such as code generation, refactoring, and debugging. Developers reported optimal results when providing clear problem statements to LLMs, highlighting their effectiveness with decomposed problems and specific requirements. Additionally, were identified as significant values for using LLMs among early adopters. They facilitate learning new languages and concepts within the field of software engineering. persist despite the observed benefits by experts in both software engineering and LLM functionality.
Created on 04 Dec. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.