Attentive Reasoning Queries: A Systematic Method for Optimizing Instruction-Following in Large Language Models
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors Bar Karov, Dor Zohar, and Yam Marcovitz introduce Attentive Reasoning Queries (ARQs) as a structured reasoning approach to optimize instruction-following in Large Language Models (LLMs).
- ARQs guide LLMs through systematic reasoning steps using targeted queries to reinforce essential instructions and facilitate intermediate reasoning.
- Testing within Parlant framework showed ARQs achieved a success rate of 90.2%, surpassing Chain-of-Thought reasoning and direct response generation.
- ARQs excelled in addressing persistent failure modes such as guideline re-application and hallucination prevention.
- Carefully designed ARQs have the potential to be more computationally efficient than free-form reasoning methods.
- Structured reasoning approaches like ARQs enable effective control over how LLMs process information and make decisions in complex scenarios.
Authors: Bar Karov, Dor Zohar, Yam Marcovitz
Abstract: We present Attentive Reasoning Queries (ARQs), a novel structured reasoning approach that significantly improves instruction-following in Large Language Models through domain-specialized reasoning blueprints. While LLMs demonstrate remarkable capabilities across diverse tasks, they often fail to maintain adherence to complex, use-case-specific instructions during multi-turn conversations, presenting challenges for business-critical applications. ARQs address this limitation by guiding LLMs through systematic reasoning steps with targeted queries that reinstate critical instructions and facilitate intermediate reasoning throughout the completion process. In extensive testing within Parlant, our framework for reliable customer-facing agents in which ARQs were born out of necessity, they achieved a 90.2% success rate across 87 test scenarios, outperforming both Chain-of-Thought reasoning (86.1%) and direct response generation (81.5%). ARQs showed particular strength in addressing persistent failure modes like guideline re-application and hallucination prevention. Our analysis also revealed that ARQs can potentially be more computationally efficient than free-form reasoning when carefully designed. These findings demonstrate that structured reasoning approaches provide effective mechanisms for controlling how LLMs process information and make decisions in complex scenarios.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.