Deep Learning is Not So Mysterious or Different

AI-generated keywords: Deep Learning Generalization Soft Inductive Biases PAC-Bayes Countable Hypothesis Bounds

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Author challenges common perception of deep neural networks exhibiting anomalous generalization behavior
  • Phenomena like benign overfitting, double descent, and success of overparametrization not unique to neural networks
  • Soft inductive biases concept as key insight to explain generalization behaviors
  • Principle advocates for embracing flexible hypothesis space with preference for simpler solutions aligned with data
  • Can be applied across various model classes, suggesting deep learning is not distinct from other models as thought
  • Unique aspects of deep learning highlighted include proficiency in representation learning, mode connectivity, and relative universality compared to other approaches
  • Paper contributes to nuanced understanding of neural networks within broader landscape of machine learning research
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Andrew Gordon Wilson

Abstract: Deep neural networks are often seen as different from other model classes by defying conventional notions of generalization. Popular examples of anomalous generalization behaviour include benign overfitting, double descent, and the success of overparametrization. We argue that these phenomena are not distinct to neural networks, or particularly mysterious. Moreover, this generalization behaviour can be intuitively understood, and rigorously characterized using long-standing generalization frameworks such as PAC-Bayes and countable hypothesis bounds. We present soft inductive biases as a key unifying principle in explaining these phenomena: rather than restricting the hypothesis space to avoid overfitting, embrace a flexible hypothesis space, with a soft preference for simpler solutions that are consistent with the data. This principle can be encoded in many model classes, and thus deep learning is not as mysterious or different from other model classes as it might seem. However, we also highlight how deep learning is relatively distinct in other ways, such as its ability for representation learning, phenomena such as mode connectivity, and its relative universality.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Mar. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2503.02113v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the paper "Deep Learning is Not So Mysterious or Different" by Andrew Gordon Wilson, the author challenges the common perception that deep neural networks exhibit anomalous generalization behavior that sets them apart from other model classes. Wilson argues that phenomena such as benign overfitting, double descent, and the success of overparametrization are not unique to neural networks and can be understood within existing generalization frameworks like PAC-Bayes and countable hypothesis bounds. The key insight presented in the paper is the concept of soft inductive biases, which serve as a unifying principle to explain these generalization behaviors. This principle advocates for embracing a flexible hypothesis space with a preference for simpler solutions that align with the data instead of constraining it to prevent overfitting. It can be applied across various model classes, suggesting that deep learning is not as enigmatic or distinct from other models as previously thought. Furthermore, while acknowledging the similarities in generalization behavior across different model classes, Wilson also highlights some unique aspects of deep learning. These include its proficiency in representation learning, phenomena like mode connectivity, and its relative universality compared to other approaches. By shedding light on both the commonalities and distinctions of deep learning, this paper contributes to a more nuanced understanding of neural networks within the broader landscape of machine learning research.
Created on 18 Mar. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: -1

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.