, , , ,
In this study, we introduce ProAI, a goal-oriented and proactive conversational AI framework designed to enhance the diagnostic capabilities of language model-driven conversational systems. Most existing conversational AI systems operate reactively, responding to user prompts without actively guiding the interaction. However, ProAI takes a proactive approach by asking relevant questions and steering conversations towards specific objectives. Drawing inspiration from Wu et al. (2023, 2024), we simulate patient interactions using an LLM agent that embodies specific mental disorders with clinically informed symptomatology and behavior. Through multi-round conversations, ProAI engages in diagnostic reasoning to accurately identify the patient's condition. The system's diagnostic accuracy is evaluated using Critical Node Recall (CN-Recall) and Differential Diagnosis Accuracy (DDx-ACC) metrics, which assess its thoroughness in assessing essential criteria nodes and ability to reach correct diagnostic conclusions while ruling out alternative conditions. User experience evaluation is crucial for ensuring a positive patient experience during clinical interviews. We measure two key dimensions - Helpfulness and Empathy - to evaluate the effectiveness of the agent's medical consultation and its ability to demonstrate understanding and build rapport with patients. Additionally, doctor evaluation ensures that diagnostic decisions are based on rigorous medical reasoning by assessing Specialty and Precision metrics related to clinical quality, coherence, adherence to guidelines, accuracy, and specificity of diagnoses. While ProAI demonstrates strong performance in mental health differential diagnosis, several limitations need consideration. Future work should expand evaluation to include a broader range of psychiatric disorders and tasks beyond mental health diagnosis. Clinical trials with real patients would further validate the system's practical utility. Automation of knowledge graph construction for different diagnostic domains could streamline system development. Overall, our study highlights the potential for more reliable, adaptive, and goal-driven AI diagnostic assistants by advancing LLMs beyond reactive dialogue systems. By combining different LLMs in a hybrid system approach like "Two Agents Mixed," we can achieve a better balance between accuracy and user experience in clinical AI systems through thoughtful design and strategic model selection.
- - ProAI is a goal-oriented and proactive conversational AI framework designed to enhance diagnostic capabilities
- - It takes a proactive approach by asking relevant questions and steering conversations towards specific objectives
- - Simulation of patient interactions using an LLM agent with clinically informed symptomatology and behavior
- - Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy using Critical Node Recall (CN-Recall) and Differential Diagnosis Accuracy (DDx-ACC) metrics
- - User experience evaluation based on Helpfulness and Empathy dimensions
- - Doctor evaluation based on Specialty and Precision metrics related to clinical quality, coherence, adherence to guidelines, accuracy, and specificity of diagnoses
- - Future considerations include expanding evaluation to include a broader range of psychiatric disorders, conducting clinical trials with real patients, and automating knowledge graph construction for different diagnostic domains
Summary- ProAI is a smart computer program that helps doctors figure out what might be wrong with a person's health.
- It asks important questions and guides conversations to find answers.
- It pretends to talk to patients like a real doctor would, using special information about symptoms and behaviors.
- Doctors check how accurate ProAI is by looking at certain numbers like CN-Recall and DDx-ACC.
- People also rate how helpful and caring ProAI is, while doctors look at its performance based on clinical quality.
Definitions1. Conversational AI: A computer program that can talk with people in a way that feels natural, like having a conversation.
2. Diagnostic: Figuring out what is causing a problem or illness in someone's body.
3. Symptomatology: The study of symptoms or signs of an illness or condition.
4. Metrics: Measurements used to evaluate the performance or effectiveness of something.
5. Empathy: Understanding and sharing the feelings of others, showing care and concern for their well-being.
Introduction
Conversational AI has rapidly evolved in recent years, with the introduction of language model-driven conversational systems. These systems use large pre-trained models to generate human-like responses and engage in natural conversations with users. However, most existing conversational AI operates reactively, responding to user prompts without actively guiding the interaction towards a specific goal.
In this research paper, we introduce ProAI - a proactive and goal-oriented conversational AI framework designed to enhance diagnostic capabilities. The system simulates patient interactions using an LLM (Language Model) agent that embodies specific mental disorders with clinically informed symptomatology and behavior. Through multi-round conversations, ProAI engages in diagnostic reasoning to accurately identify the patient's condition.
Evaluation Metrics
To evaluate the performance of ProAI, we use two main metrics - Critical Node Recall (CN-Recall) and Differential Diagnosis Accuracy (DDx-ACC). CN-Recall measures the system's thoroughness in assessing essential criteria nodes during diagnosis. DDx-ACC evaluates its ability to reach correct diagnostic conclusions while ruling out alternative conditions.
User experience is also crucial for ensuring a positive patient experience during clinical interviews. We measure two key dimensions - Helpfulness and Empathy - to evaluate the effectiveness of ProAI's medical consultation and its ability to demonstrate understanding and build rapport with patients.
Additionally, doctor evaluation ensures that diagnostic decisions are based on rigorous medical reasoning by assessing Specialty and Precision metrics related to clinical quality, coherence, adherence to guidelines, accuracy, and specificity of diagnoses.
Limitations & Future Work
While our study demonstrates strong performance in mental health differential diagnosis using ProAI, there are several limitations that need consideration. Firstly, future work should expand evaluation to include a broader range of psychiatric disorders beyond those simulated in this study.
Moreover, conducting clinical trials with real patients would further validate the practical utility of ProAI. This would also help in gathering feedback and improving the system's performance based on real-world interactions.
Another area for future work is the automation of knowledge graph construction for different diagnostic domains. This could streamline system development and make it easier to adapt ProAI for various medical specialties.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our study highlights the potential for more reliable, adaptive, and goal-driven AI diagnostic assistants by advancing LLMs beyond reactive dialogue systems. By combining different LLMs in a hybrid system approach like "Two Agents Mixed," we can achieve a better balance between accuracy and user experience in clinical AI systems through thoughtful design and strategic model selection.
ProAI has shown promising results in mental health differential diagnosis, but there is still room for improvement and expansion into other medical domains. With further research and development, ProAI has the potential to revolutionize clinical interviews by providing accurate diagnoses while also creating a positive patient experience through proactive conversation guidance and empathy-building capabilities.