A necessary condition for the guarantee of the superiorization method
AI-generated Key Points
- The paper discusses the superiorization method (SM) in optimization, which combines convex feasibility-seeking and objective function value reduction techniques.
- The primary goal of the SM is to perturb iterates of an asymptotically convergent feasibility-seeking algorithm with nonascent steps to achieve superior outcomes in terms of objective function values.
- The authors investigate conditions for which a sequence generated by an SM algorithm asymptotically converges to a feasible point with a smaller or equal objective function value compared to an unperturbed feasibility-seeking algorithm.
- They identify a specific condition where an SM algorithm using negative gradient descent steps fails, which has significant implications for future guarantee results for the SM.
- Practitioners can avoid this condition in experimental work with the SM, increasing its success rate in real-world applications.
- The original motivation behind developing the SM was to address scenarios where efficiently reaching a feasible point within multiple sets' intersection is crucial.
- By providing a low-cost perturbation that enhances objective function value reduction while maintaining convergence towards feasibility, the SM offers a valuable tool for optimization problems.
- This study sheds light on key aspects of the superiorization method and its potential applications in various optimization scenarios.
Authors: Kay Barshad, Yair Censor, Walaa Moursi, Tyler Weames, Henry Wolkowicz
Abstract: We study a method that involves principally convex feasibility-seeking and makes secondary efforts of objective function value reduction. This is the well-known superiorization method (SM), where the iterates of an asymptotically convergent iterative feasibility-seeking algorithm are perturbed by objective function nonascent steps. We investigate the question under what conditions a sequence generated by an SM algorithm asymptotically converges to a feasible point whose objective function value is superior (meaning smaller or equal) to that of a feasible point reached by the corresponding unperturbed one (i.e., the exactly same feasibility-seeking algorithm that the SM algorithm employs.) This question is yet only partially answered in the literature. We present a condition under which an SM algorithm that uses negative gradient descent steps in its perturbations fails to yield such a superior outcome. The significance of the discovery of this negative condition is that it necessitates that the inverse of this condition will have to be assumed to hold in any future guarantee result for the SM. The condition is important for practitioners who use the SM because it is avoidable in experimental work with the SM, thus increasing the success rate of the method in real-world applications.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.