Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2502.03387v1

In their groundbreaking paper "LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning," authors Yixin Ye, Zhen Huang, Yang Xiao, Ethan Chern, Shijie Xia, and Pengfei Liu challenge conventional wisdom on complex reasoning in large language models. They demonstrate that sophisticated mathematical reasoning abilities can be elicited with surprisingly few examples - a stark contrast to the commonly held belief that extensive training data exceeding 100,000 examples is necessary. Through comprehensive experiments, they introduce LIMO - their proposed model that achieves unprecedented performance in mathematical reasoning tasks. Remarkably, with just 817 carefully curated training samples, LIMO achieves accuracy rates of 57.1% on AIME and 94.8% on MATH - significant improvements over previous SFT-based models' performance levels of 6.5% and 59.2%, respectively - while utilizing only 1% of the traditional training data required by existing approaches. Furthermore, LIMO exhibits exceptional out-of-distribution generalization capabilities by achieving a substantial 40.5% absolute improvement across ten diverse benchmarks compared to models trained on significantly more data. Based on these findings, the authors propose the Less-Is-More Reasoning Hypothesis (LIMO Hypothesis), which suggests that in foundation models where domain knowledge has been comprehensively encoded during pre-training, sophisticated reasoning capabilities can emerge through minimal yet precisely orchestrated demonstrations of cognitive processes. This hypothesis posits that the threshold for eliciting complex reasoning is influenced by two key factors: the completeness of the model's encoded knowledge foundation during pre-training and the effectiveness of post-training examples as "cognitive templates" guiding the model in utilizing its knowledge base to solve intricate reasoning tasks. To promote reproducibility and facilitate future research in data-efficient reasoning methods, the authors have made LIMO available as an extensive open-source suite accessible at https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/LIMO. This work's implications challenge prevailing notions about training data requirements for developing advanced reasoning abilities in language models and offer valuable insights into optimizing cognitive processes within AI systems.

• - Authors challenge conventional wisdom on complex reasoning in large language models
• - Introduce LIMO model for mathematical reasoning tasks with minimal training data
• - LIMO achieves high accuracy rates with only 817 training samples
• - Shows significant improvements over previous models while using only 1% of traditional training data
• - Demonstrates exceptional out-of-distribution generalization capabilities across diverse benchmarks
• - Propose Less-Is-More Reasoning Hypothesis for eliciting complex reasoning in foundation models
• - Emphasize importance of completeness of model's encoded knowledge foundation and effectiveness of post-training examples
• - Provide LIMO as open-source suite to promote reproducibility and future research in data-efficient reasoning methods

SummaryAuthors have new ideas about how smart computer programs can solve hard problems. They made a special model called LIMO to help with math problems even with little practice. LIMO is very good at getting the right answers, even when it only learned from a few examples. It's much better than other models that need lots of practice to do well. LIMO can also solve different kinds of problems without any trouble. Definitions- Authors: People who write books or articles. - Conventional wisdom: Common beliefs or ideas that many people think are true. - Model: A simplified version of something used to understand or represent it. - Accuracy rates: How often something is correct or accurate. - Training samples: Examples used to teach a model how to do something. - Out-of-distribution generalization capabilities: Ability to apply knowledge beyond what was originally taught. - Hypothesis: An idea or explanation that needs to be tested and proven correct. - Completeness: Having all the necessary parts or information. - Encoded knowledge foundation: Basic understanding stored in a model's memory. - Reproducibility: Being able to repeat an experiment and get the same results.

Introduction

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have made significant strides in natural language processing tasks such as text generation and question-answering. However, one area where these models still struggle is complex reasoning - the ability to solve intricate mathematical problems or make logical deductions based on given information. This has led to the belief that extensive training data is necessary for LLMs to develop sophisticated reasoning abilities. However, a groundbreaking research paper titled "LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning" challenges this conventional wisdom. The authors - Yixin Ye, Zhen Huang, Yang Xiao, Ethan Chern, Shijie Xia, and Pengfei Liu - demonstrate that with just a fraction of the traditional training data used by existing approaches, their proposed model LIMO can achieve unprecedented performance in mathematical reasoning tasks.

The LIMO Model

The key idea behind LIMO is to leverage pre-trained knowledge foundations in LLMs and use carefully curated examples as "cognitive templates" to guide the model's reasoning process. This approach allows for minimal yet precise demonstrations of cognitive processes that elicit advanced reasoning capabilities. To test their hypothesis, the authors conducted comprehensive experiments on two benchmark datasets - AIME (American Invitational Mathematics Examination) and MATH - which require high-level mathematical reasoning skills. Remarkably, with just 817 training samples from each dataset (a mere 1% of what existing approaches use), LIMO achieved accuracy rates of 57.1% on AIME and 94.8% on MATH. These results are significantly higher than previous state-of-the-art SFT-based models' performance levels of 6.5% and 59.2%, respectively. Furthermore, when tested on ten diverse benchmarks outside its training data distribution, LIMO exhibited exceptional generalization capabilities with an average absolute improvement of 40.5%.

The LIMO Hypothesis

Based on their findings, the authors propose the Less-Is-More Reasoning Hypothesis (LIMO Hypothesis), which challenges prevailing notions about training data requirements for developing advanced reasoning abilities in language models. This hypothesis suggests that in foundation models where domain knowledge has been comprehensively encoded during pre-training, sophisticated reasoning capabilities can emerge through minimal yet precisely orchestrated demonstrations of cognitive processes. The LIMO Hypothesis posits that two key factors influence the threshold for eliciting complex reasoning - the completeness of the model's encoded knowledge foundation during pre-training and the effectiveness of post-training examples as "cognitive templates" guiding the model in utilizing its knowledge base to solve intricate reasoning tasks.

Implications and Future Research

The implications of this research are significant, as it challenges commonly held beliefs about training data requirements for developing advanced reasoning abilities in language models. It also offers valuable insights into optimizing cognitive processes within AI systems. Moreover, by making LIMO available as an extensive open-source suite accessible at https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/LIMO, the authors aim to promote reproducibility and facilitate future research in data-efficient reasoning methods. This will enable researchers to further explore and expand upon their findings, potentially leading to even more efficient and effective approaches for developing sophisticated reasoning capabilities in language models.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Ye et al.'s paper "LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning" presents a groundbreaking approach to develop advanced mathematical reasoning abilities in large language models with surprisingly few examples. Their proposed model LIMO achieves unprecedented performance levels while utilizing only 1% of traditional training data required by existing approaches. The results challenge conventional wisdom on training data requirements for complex reasoning tasks and offer valuable insights into optimizing cognitive processes within AI systems. With their open-source suite, they hope to encourage further research in data-efficient reasoning methods and drive progress in this important area of natural language processing.