Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2412.12591v1

Large language models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing by achieving exceptional performance across various tasks. Recently, there has been a shift towards recognizing their effectiveness as embedding models, moving away from traditional encoder-only models like ELMo and BERT to decoder-only, large-scale LLMs such as GPT, LLaMA, and Mistral. This comprehensive survey delves into this transition and explores two primary strategies for deriving embeddings: direct prompting and data-centric tuning. were first discussed before diving into the details of LLM-based embedding models. Direct prompting involves discussing prompt designs and the rationale behind generating competitive embeddings. On the other hand, data-centric tuning covers various aspects influencing the tuning of an embedding model, including model architecture, training objectives, and data constructions. Additionally,, such as handling longer texts and multilingual/cross-modal data are explored in detail. The survey also examines factors impacting the selection of embedding models such as performance/efficiency trade-offs, dense vs sparse embeddings, pooling strategies, and scaling laws. Furthermore,in adapting LLMs for embeddings are highlighted. These include cross-task embedding quality issues, balancing efficiency with accuracy trade-offs, low-resource scenarios, long-context considerations, data biases,and robustness concerns. Moreover,have focused on extending the context of LLM embedding models through plug-and-play methods to address high computational costs associated with fine-tuning LLMs. For instance,Luo et al. (2024a) proposed a chunking-free architecture to handle long contexts effectively. In conclusion,this survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners by synthesizing current advancements in LLMs as embedding models while shedding light on key challenges. It offers a comprehensive framework for future work aimed at enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of LLMs in their role as embedding models within natural language processing tasks.

• - Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing with exceptional performance across tasks.
• - Shift towards decoder-only LLMs like GPT, LLaMA, and Mistral for embedding models.
• - Two primary strategies for deriving embeddings: direct prompting and data-centric tuning.
• - Direct prompting involves prompt designs and rationale for competitive embeddings.
• - Data-centric tuning covers model architecture, training objectives, and data constructions influencing embedding tuning.
• - Challenges addressed include handling longer texts, multilingual/cross-modal data, performance/efficiency trade-offs, dense vs sparse embeddings, pooling strategies, scaling laws.
• - Adaptation challenges of LLMs for embeddings: cross-task quality issues, efficiency vs accuracy trade-offs, low-resource scenarios, long-context considerations, data biases, robustness concerns.
• - Extension of context in LLM embedding models through plug-and-play methods to address high computational costs associated with fine-tuning LLMs (e.g., chunking-free architecture proposed by Luo et al.).
• - Survey serves as a valuable resource synthesizing advancements in LLMs as embedding models and highlights key challenges for future work in enhancing their effectiveness and efficiency within NLP tasks.

SummaryLarge language models (LLMs) are powerful tools that help computers understand and process human language really well. Some newer LLMs, like GPT, LLaMA, and Mistral, focus on using only the decoder part for making these models even better. There are two main ways to create word representations with LLMs: by giving them specific instructions or by adjusting them based on different types of data. These methods help improve how well the models work in various tasks. Challenges include dealing with long texts, different languages and types of data, and finding the right balance between performance and efficiency. Definitions- Large language models (LLMs): Advanced computer programs that can understand and process human language. - Embeddings: Representations of words or phrases in a way that computers can understand. - Decoder-only LLMs: Models that focus on one part of the large language model for better performance. - Prompting: Giving specific instructions or cues to the model to generate word representations. - Data-centric tuning: Adjusting word representations based on different types of data to improve performance.

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the field of natural language processing (NLP) by achieving exceptional performance across various tasks. These models, such as GPT, LLaMA, and Mistral, have shown great potential in not only generating text but also serving as effective embedding models. This comprehensive survey delves into the recent shift towards recognizing the effectiveness of LLMs as embedding models and explores different strategies for deriving embeddings. The first section of this survey discusses the transition from traditional encoder-only models like ELMo and BERT to decoder-only LLMs for embedding purposes. It highlights how these large-scale LLMs have proven to be more efficient and effective in capturing contextual information compared to their predecessors. Next, two primary strategies for deriving embeddings are explored: direct prompting and data-centric tuning. Direct prompting involves discussing prompt designs and the rationale behind generating competitive embeddings. This approach has been widely used in recent studies due to its simplicity and effectiveness in producing high-quality embeddings. On the other hand, data-centric tuning covers various aspects influencing the tuning of an embedding model, including model architecture, training objectives, and data constructions. This strategy takes a more holistic approach towards creating embeddings by considering all factors that can impact their quality. The survey then delves into specific challenges faced when using LLMs as embedding models. For instance, handling longer texts is a crucial aspect that needs to be addressed since most NLP tasks involve processing lengthy documents or articles. Additionally, multilingual/cross-modal data presents another challenge that requires specialized techniques for effectively utilizing LLM-based embeddings. Furthermore,in adapting LLMs for embeddings are highlighted. These include cross-task embedding quality issues where an embedding model trained on one task may not perform well on another task without further fine-tuning or modifications. Balancing efficiency with accuracy trade-offs is also a significant concern when using large-scale LLMs as they require extensive computational resources. Low-resource scenarios, long-context considerations, data biases,and robustness concerns are other important factors that need to be addressed when using LLMs as embedding models. To address these challenges, researchers have proposed various methods for extending the context of LLM embedding models through plug-and-play techniques. For instance,Luo et al. (2024a) proposed a chunking-free architecture to handle long contexts effectively. This approach has shown promising results in reducing the computational costs associated with fine-tuning LLMs while maintaining their performance. In conclusion,this survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners by synthesizing current advancements in LLMs as embedding models while shedding light on key challenges. It offers a comprehensive framework for future work aimed at enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of LLMs in their role as embedding models within natural language processing tasks. Overall, this research paper highlights the significant impact of large language models on NLP and how they have evolved from being just text generation tools to effective embedding models. The survey provides a detailed overview of different strategies for deriving embeddings and discusses key challenges faced when using LLMs in this role. It also presents potential solutions and areas for future research, making it an essential read for anyone interested in understanding the current state-of-the-art in LLM-based embeddings within NLP tasks.