Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2412.10360v1

In recent years, there has been a rapid integration of video perception capabilities into Large Multimodal Models (LMMs). However, the underlying mechanisms driving video understanding in these models remain poorly understood. This has led to design decisions being made without proper justification or analysis. The high computational cost associated with training and evaluating such models, coupled with limited open research in this area, has hindered the development of video-LMMs. To address these challenges, a comprehensive study was conducted to uncover what effectively drives video understanding in LMMs. The study began by critically examining the primary contributors to the high computational requirements of video-LMM research and identified Scaling Consistency as a key factor. This concept suggests that design and training decisions made on smaller models and datasets can effectively transfer to larger models up to a critical size. Building on these insights, the study explored various video-specific aspects of video-LMMs including video sampling techniques, architectures, data composition, training schedules, and more. For example, it was demonstrated that fps sampling during training is preferable to uniform frame sampling and certain vision encoders are better suited for video representation. Guided by these findings, Apollo was introduced as a state-of-the-art family of LMMs that achieve superior performance across different model sizes. Apollo-3B outperformed most existing $7$B models with an impressive score on LongVideoBench. Additionally, Apollo-7B surpassed all 7B LMMs on MLVU and Video-MME benchmarks. The study also highlighted the importance of systematically exploring the design space for image-based LMMs and emphasized the need for specialized strategies when designing video-LMMs due to their unique challenges. By addressing these gaps in research and providing valuable insights into key aspects of video-LMM design,this work aims to democratize video-LMM research and accelerate advancements in the field. In conclusion, the study provides guidelines and resources for future research in developing efficient and effective video-LMMs. The findings suggest that careful design and training strategies can lead to superior performance without necessarily requiring larger model sizes. Overall, this work contributes to advancing the development of scalable solutions for video understanding within Large Multimodal Models.

• - Rapid integration of video perception capabilities into Large Multimodal Models (LMMs)
• - Poor understanding of underlying mechanisms driving video understanding in LMMs
• - High computational cost associated with training and evaluating video-LMMs
• - Comprehensive study conducted to uncover key factors driving video understanding in LMMs
• - Scaling Consistency identified as a key factor influencing computational requirements
• - Importance of exploring various video-specific aspects in designing video-LMMs, such as fps sampling, vision encoders, and data composition
• - Introduction of Apollo as a state-of-the-art family of LMMs achieving superior performance across different model sizes
• - Need for specialized strategies when designing video-LMMs due to unique challenges
• - Aim to democratize video-LMM research and accelerate advancements in the field by providing guidelines and resources for future research

Summary- Video abilities are being added quickly to big models that can understand many things. - People don't know well how these big models understand videos. - It costs a lot of computer power to teach and test these video-understanding models. - A big study was done to find out what makes these models understand videos better. - One important thing is making sure the model works consistently as it gets bigger. Definitions- **Video**: Moving pictures shown on a screen. - **Models**: Computer programs that can learn and make decisions like humans. - **Understanding**: Knowing or figuring out how something works or what it means. - **Computational cost**: The amount of computer power needed for a task. - **Factors**: Things that have an effect on something else.

Introduction: In recent years, there has been a growing interest in incorporating video perception capabilities into Large Multimodal Models (LMMs). These models have shown great potential for solving complex tasks such as image recognition and natural language processing. However, the underlying mechanisms driving video understanding in these models are still not fully understood. This lack of understanding has led to design decisions being made without proper justification or analysis, hindering the development of efficient and effective video-LMMs. To address this gap, a comprehensive study was conducted to uncover what effectively drives video understanding in LMMs. The Challenges of Video-LMM Research: One of the main challenges in video-LMM research is the high computational cost associated with training and evaluating these models. This is due to the large amount of data required for training and the complexity of video understanding tasks. Additionally, limited open research in this area further hinders progress. Identifying Scaling Consistency as a Key Factor: To better understand the factors driving video understanding in LMMs, researchers critically examined the primary contributors to high computational requirements. They identified Scaling Consistency as a key factor that can help reduce computational costs while maintaining performance levels. This concept suggests that design and training decisions made on smaller models and datasets can effectively transfer to larger models up to a critical size. Exploring Video-Specific Aspects: Building on these insights, the study delved into various aspects specific to video-LMMs including sampling techniques, architectures, data composition, training schedules, and more. For example, it was demonstrated that fps sampling during training is preferable to uniform frame sampling for achieving better performance. The study also found certain vision encoders to be better suited for representing videos than others. Introducing Apollo: A State-of-the-Art Family of LMMs: Guided by their findings, researchers introduced Apollo as a state-of-the-art family of LMMs designed specifically for efficient and effective video understanding. Apollo-3B, the smallest model in the family, outperformed most existing $7$B models on the LongVideoBench benchmark. Additionally, Apollo-7B surpassed all 7B LMMs on MLVU and Video-MME benchmarks. Importance of Systematically Exploring Design Space: The study also highlighted the importance of systematically exploring the design space for image-based LMMs. This involves carefully considering various aspects such as model size, architecture, and training strategies to achieve optimal performance. The researchers emphasized that specialized strategies are needed when designing video-LMMs due to their unique challenges. Democratizing Video-LMM Research: By addressing gaps in research and providing valuable insights into key aspects of video-LMM design, this work aims to democratize video-LMM research and accelerate advancements in the field. The findings suggest that careful design and training strategies can lead to superior performance without necessarily requiring larger model sizes. Conclusion: In conclusion, this comprehensive study provides guidelines and resources for future research in developing efficient and effective video-LMMs. By identifying Scaling Consistency as a key factor driving video understanding in LMMs and introducing Apollo as a state-of-the-art family of models, this work contributes significantly to advancing scalable solutions for video understanding within Large Multimodal Models. With further exploration of the design space and specialized strategies for video-LMMs, we can expect even more impressive advancements in this field in the near future.