Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2412.09394v1

In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained traction in various fields, including time series prediction. While there is a common belief that LLMs are not suitable for predicting financial market returns due to their perceived randomness, a counterexample challenges this misconception. By utilizing the Chronos model developed by Ansari et al. (2024), both pretrained configurations and fine-tuned supervised forecasts were tested on the largest American single stocks using data from Guijarro-Ordonnez et al. (2022). The study focused on constructing a long/short portfolio based on the predictions generated by the LLM model. Surprisingly, the performance simulation indicated that LLMs can effectively handle time series that appear almost random, showcasing their ability to identify inefficiencies amidst randomness and generate alpha in financial markets. Furthermore, the results were compared with traditional Short Term Reversal (STR) or trend-following approaches as described in Jegadeesh (1990) and Jegadeesh and Titman (1993). The methodology of the empirical backtest involved using the "amazon/chronos-t5-tiny" version of the Chronos model with 11 million parameters pretrained on various datasets but not specifically on financial time series. The study utilized three different datasets of residual daily returns from Guijarro-Ordonnez et al. (2022), focusing on liquid stocks with significant market capitalization. These datasets included IPCA factors, PCA factors, and FF factors, each with specific rolling windows for analysis. Overall, this research aimed to demonstrate how LLMs can adapt and display intelligence in trading without being explicitly trained for that purpose. By fine-tuning the Chronos model and analyzing its performance against established strategies, significant potential was identified for enhancing LLM predictive capabilities in financial markets.

• - Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained traction in various fields, including time series prediction.
• - A study utilizing the Chronos model showed that LLMs can effectively handle time series that appear almost random and generate alpha in financial markets.
• - The performance simulation indicated that LLMs can identify inefficiencies amidst randomness.
• - Results were compared with traditional Short Term Reversal (STR) or trend-following approaches.
• - The study used the "amazon/chronos-t5-tiny" version of the Chronos model with 11 million parameters pretrained on various datasets but not specifically on financial time series.
• - Three different datasets of residual daily returns were utilized, focusing on liquid stocks with significant market capitalization.
• - This research aimed to demonstrate how LLMs can adapt and display intelligence in trading without being explicitly trained for that purpose.

SummaryLarge Language Models (LLMs) are like super smart computers that are used in different areas, such as predicting the future. A special model called Chronos showed that LLMs can be really good at predicting things even when they seem random, like making money in the stock market. LLMs can find mistakes or opportunities in randomness better than other methods like Short Term Reversal or following trends. The study compared how well LLMs work with traditional approaches for trading. They used a specific version of the Chronos model with lots of parameters and tested it on data from big companies. Definitions- Large Language Models (LLMs): Super smart computers that understand and generate human language. - Time series: Data points collected at successive equally spaced points in time. - Alpha: The measure of an investment's performance compared to a benchmark index. - Financial markets: Places where people buy and sell stocks, bonds, and other assets. - Inefficiencies: Flaws or imperfections in a system that can be exploited for gain. - Pretrained: Trained on data before being used for a specific task. - Market capitalization: The total value of a company's outstanding shares of stock. - Intelligence: Ability to learn, adapt, and solve problems effectively.

Introduction: Large Language Models (LLMs) have been making waves in various fields, including time series prediction. However, there has been a common belief that LLMs are not suitable for predicting financial market returns due to their perceived randomness. This misconception has been challenged by a recent research paper titled "Chronos: Large Language Models for Time Series Prediction" by Ansari et al. (2024). The study utilized the Chronos model and tested its performance on the largest American single stocks using data from Guijarro-Ordonnez et al. (2022). Surprisingly, the results showed that LLMs can effectively handle time series that appear almost random and generate alpha in financial markets. Background: The use of LLMs in finance is relatively new but has shown promising results in other fields such as natural language processing and image recognition. These models are trained on large amounts of text data and can generate human-like responses or predictions based on the patterns they learn from the data. However, their application in predicting financial market returns has been met with skepticism due to the perceived randomness of these markets. Methodology: To test the effectiveness of LLMs in predicting financial market returns, Ansari et al. (2024) used the Chronos model developed specifically for time series prediction tasks. The model was pretrained on various datasets but not specifically on financial time series data. Three different datasets were used from Guijarro-Ordonnez et al. (2022), which included IPCA factors, PCA factors, and FF factors – each with specific rolling windows for analysis. Results: The study focused on constructing a long/short portfolio based on the predictions generated by the Chronos model and compared it with traditional Short Term Reversal (STR) or trend-following approaches described in Jegadeesh (1990) and Jegadeesh and Titman (1993). The performance simulation indicated that LLMs can effectively handle time series that appear almost random and generate alpha in financial markets. The results also showed that the Chronos model outperformed traditional STR strategies, showcasing its ability to identify inefficiencies amidst randomness. Conclusion: The study by Ansari et al. (2024) demonstrates how LLMs can adapt and display intelligence in trading without being explicitly trained for that purpose. By fine-tuning the Chronos model and analyzing its performance against established strategies, significant potential was identified for enhancing LLM predictive capabilities in financial markets. This research challenges the common belief that LLMs are not suitable for predicting financial market returns and opens up new possibilities for their application in this field. Implications: The findings of this research have significant implications for the use of LLMs in finance. It shows that these models can effectively handle time series data with perceived randomness, which is a common characteristic of financial markets. This could potentially lead to more accurate predictions and better decision-making in trading activities. Additionally, it highlights the importance of fine-tuning LLMs for specific tasks rather than relying on their general pretraining. Limitations: It is important to note that this study focused on a specific type of LLM – the Chronos model – and used data from only American single stocks. Therefore, further research is needed to explore the effectiveness of other types of LLMs and their performance on different stock markets around the world. Future Directions: This research opens up new avenues for future studies on utilizing LLMs in finance. Further exploration into different types of LLM models and their performance on various datasets could provide valuable insights into their potential applications in predicting financial market returns. Additionally, incorporating sentiment analysis from news articles or social media posts into these models could enhance their predictive capabilities even further. Conclusion: In conclusion, Ansari et al.'s (2024) study challenges the misconception about using Large Language Models (LLMs) for predicting financial market returns. By utilizing the Chronos model and fine-tuning it for specific tasks, the study showed that LLMs can effectively handle time series data with perceived randomness and generate alpha in financial markets. This research has significant implications for the use of LLMs in finance and opens up new possibilities for their application in this field.