Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space

AI-generated keywords: LLMs reasoning tasks Coconut continuous thought representation latent reasoning paradigms

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Recent advancements in language models (LLMs) show potential in solving complex reasoning tasks
  • Traditional chain-of-thought (CoT) methodology may not always be optimal for these tasks
  • Many word tokens in the language space serve more for textual coherence than essential reasoning components
  • Certain critical tokens pose challenges for LLMs during planning stages
  • Introduction of Coconut paradigm enhances LLM reasoning capabilities by feeding back input embedding directly in a continuous latent space
  • Coconut enables encoding multiple alternative next reasoning steps, adopting a breadth-first search (BFS) strategy for greater flexibility and adaptability
  • Experimental results demonstrate Coconut's effectiveness in enhancing LLM performance across various reasoning tasks, particularly logical reasoning tasks requiring extensive backtracking
  • Coconut outperforms CoT, reducing the number of thinking tokens needed during inference
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Shibo Hao, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, DiJia Su, Xian Li, Zhiting Hu, Jason Weston, Yuandong Tian

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are restricted to reason in the "language space", where they typically express the reasoning process with a chain-of-thought (CoT) to solve a complex reasoning problem. However, we argue that language space may not always be optimal for reasoning. For example, most word tokens are primarily for textual coherence and not essential for reasoning, while some critical tokens require complex planning and pose huge challenges to LLMs. To explore the potential of LLM reasoning in an unrestricted latent space instead of using natural language, we introduce a new paradigm Coconut (Chain of Continuous Thought). We utilize the last hidden state of the LLM as a representation of the reasoning state (termed "continuous thought"). Rather than decoding this into a word token, we feed it back to the LLM as the subsequent input embedding directly in the continuous space. Experiments show that Coconut can effectively augment the LLM on several reasoning tasks. This novel latent reasoning paradigm leads to emergent advanced reasoning patterns: the continuous thought can encode multiple alternative next reasoning steps, allowing the model to perform a breadth-first search (BFS) to solve the problem, rather than prematurely committing to a single deterministic path like CoT. Coconut outperforms CoT in certain logical reasoning tasks that require substantial backtracking during planning, with fewer thinking tokens during inference. These findings demonstrate the promise of latent reasoning and offer valuable insights for future research.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Dec. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2412.06769v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Recent advancements in language models (LLMs) have shown great potential in solving complex reasoning tasks. However, the traditional approach of using a chain-of-thought (CoT) methodology may not always be optimal for these tasks. The authors argue that many word tokens within this language space serve more for textual coherence rather than essential reasoning components. Furthermore, certain critical tokens present significant challenges for LLMs during planning stages. To address these limitations and unlock the full potential of LLM reasoning capabilities, the authors introduce a novel paradigm called Coconut (Chain of Continuous Thought). Unlike traditional CoT methods that decode representations into word tokens, Coconut feeds it back to the LLM as the subsequent input embedding directly in a continuous latent space. Experimental results demonstrate that Coconut effectively enhances LLM performance across various reasoning tasks. One key advantage of Coconut is its ability to encode multiple alternative next reasoning steps within the continuous thought representation. This feature enables the model to adopt a breadth-first search (BFS) strategy when solving problems, allowing for greater flexibility and adaptability compared to committing prematurely to a single deterministic path as seen in CoT approaches. Notably, Coconut outperforms CoT particularly in logical reasoning tasks that require extensive backtracking during planning stages while also reducing the number of thinking tokens needed during inference. Overall, this study sheds light on the promise of latent reasoning paradigms like Coconut and provides valuable insights for future research endeavors aimed at enhancing LLM capabilities in complex reasoning scenarios.
Created on 11 Dec. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.