ARMOR: Egocentric Perception for Humanoid Robot Collision Avoidance and Motion Planning

AI-generated keywords: Robotics Humanoid Robots Egocentric Perception ARMOR Collision Avoidance

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Challenges faced by humanoid robots in sensing and perception while navigating dense environments
  • Development of ARMOR, an egocentric perception system for enhancing collision avoidance and motion planning
  • Integration of hardware and software components, including wearable-like depth sensors tailored for humanoid robots
  • Key feature: distributed perception approach improving spatial awareness and enabling agile motion planning capabilities
  • Implementation of a transformer-based imitation learning (IL) policy trained on human realistic motions from the AMASS dataset
  • Results showing significant improvements over traditional setups, with a 63.7% reduction in collisions and a 78.7% improvement in success rate
  • Comparison with cuRobo demonstrating superior performance of IL policy with a 31.6% decrease in collisions, 16.9% higher success rate, and 26x reduction in computational latency
  • Deployment of ARMOR on a GR1 humanoid robot for real-world validation
  • Future plans to update publication with source code, hardware descriptions, and CAD files for further research and development
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Daehwa Kim, Mario Srouji, Chen Chen, Jian Zhang

Abstract: Humanoid robots have significant gaps in their sensing and perception, making it hard to perform motion planning in dense environments. To address this, we introduce ARMOR, a novel egocentric perception system that integrates both hardware and software, specifically incorporating wearable-like depth sensors for humanoid robots. Our distributed perception approach enhances the robot's spatial awareness, and facilitates more agile motion planning. We also train a transformer-based imitation learning (IL) policy in simulation to perform dynamic collision avoidance, by leveraging around 86 hours worth of human realistic motions from the AMASS dataset. We show that our ARMOR perception is superior against a setup with multiple dense head-mounted, and externally mounted depth cameras, with a 63.7% reduction in collisions, and 78.7% improvement on success rate. We also compare our IL policy against a sampling-based motion planning expert cuRobo, showing 31.6% less collisions, 16.9% higher success rate, and 26x reduction in computational latency. Lastly, we deploy our ARMOR perception on our real-world GR1 humanoid from Fourier Intelligence. We are going to update the link to the source code, HW description, and 3D CAD files in the arXiv version of this text.

Submitted to arXiv on 30 Nov. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2412.00396v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of robotics, humanoid robots face challenges in sensing and perception while navigating through dense environments. To address this issue, a team of researchers led by Daehwa Kim, Mario Srouji, Chen Chen, and Jian Zhang have developed ARMOR - an innovative egocentric perception system designed to enhance collision avoidance and motion planning for humanoid robots. This system integrates both hardware and software components, including wearable-like depth sensors specifically tailored for humanoid robots. The key feature of ARMOR is its distributed perception approach which significantly improves the robot's spatial awareness and enables more agile motion planning capabilities. Additionally, the researchers implemented a transformer-based imitation learning (IL) policy in simulation as part of the hardware setup. This IL policy was trained using approximately 86 hours of human realistic motions extracted from the AMASS dataset. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of ARMOR compared to traditional setups utilizing multiple dense head-mounted and externally mounted depth cameras. The ARMOR perception system achieved a remarkable 63.7% reduction in collisions and a substantial 78.7% improvement in success rate. Furthermore, the researchers compared their IL policy against a sampling-based motion planning expert cuRobo. The results showed that the IL policy outperformed cuRobo with a 31.6% decrease in collisions, a 16.9% higher success rate, and an impressive 26x reduction in computational latency. To validate their findings in real-world scenarios, the team deployed the ARMOR perception system on a GR1 humanoid robot from Fourier Intelligence. Moving forward, they plan to update the arXiv version of their publication with links to source code, hardware descriptions, and 3D CAD files for further research and development. Overall,in enhancing humanoid robot capabilities through innovative egocentric perception systems like ARMOR. By addressing gaps in sensing and perception, these advancements pave the way for more efficient and reliable navigation in complex environments for humanoid robots.
Created on 03 Jan. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.