ARMOR: Egocentric Perception for Humanoid Robot Collision Avoidance and Motion Planning
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Challenges faced by humanoid robots in sensing and perception while navigating dense environments
- Development of ARMOR, an egocentric perception system for enhancing collision avoidance and motion planning
- Integration of hardware and software components, including wearable-like depth sensors tailored for humanoid robots
- Key feature: distributed perception approach improving spatial awareness and enabling agile motion planning capabilities
- Implementation of a transformer-based imitation learning (IL) policy trained on human realistic motions from the AMASS dataset
- Results showing significant improvements over traditional setups, with a 63.7% reduction in collisions and a 78.7% improvement in success rate
- Comparison with cuRobo demonstrating superior performance of IL policy with a 31.6% decrease in collisions, 16.9% higher success rate, and 26x reduction in computational latency
- Deployment of ARMOR on a GR1 humanoid robot for real-world validation
- Future plans to update publication with source code, hardware descriptions, and CAD files for further research and development
Authors: Daehwa Kim, Mario Srouji, Chen Chen, Jian Zhang
Abstract: Humanoid robots have significant gaps in their sensing and perception, making it hard to perform motion planning in dense environments. To address this, we introduce ARMOR, a novel egocentric perception system that integrates both hardware and software, specifically incorporating wearable-like depth sensors for humanoid robots. Our distributed perception approach enhances the robot's spatial awareness, and facilitates more agile motion planning. We also train a transformer-based imitation learning (IL) policy in simulation to perform dynamic collision avoidance, by leveraging around 86 hours worth of human realistic motions from the AMASS dataset. We show that our ARMOR perception is superior against a setup with multiple dense head-mounted, and externally mounted depth cameras, with a 63.7% reduction in collisions, and 78.7% improvement on success rate. We also compare our IL policy against a sampling-based motion planning expert cuRobo, showing 31.6% less collisions, 16.9% higher success rate, and 26x reduction in computational latency. Lastly, we deploy our ARMOR perception on our real-world GR1 humanoid from Fourier Intelligence. We are going to update the link to the source code, HW description, and 3D CAD files in the arXiv version of this text.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.