Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2411.18731v1

This paper compares the performance of four Large Language Models (LLMs) - ChatGPT, PaLM, LLama, and Falcon - in generating deep learning models for analyzing time series data. Time series data is crucial in various domains such as finance and stock markets. The study conducts controlled experiments using prompts adjusted based on criteria like clarity, specificity, objective, intent, contextual information, and format/style. Results show that LLMs can generate executable codes for each dataset separately and perform comparably to manually crafted LSTM models. ChatGPT emerges as the top performer among the tested LLMs. The study also highlights the impact of "temperature" parameter on model quality and provides insights on Falcon and LLama-2 LLMs. Falcon stands out for its tailored tools and efficient data flow approach while LLama-2 offers a range of pretrained models with excellent discourse capabilities. This research sheds light on LLMs' potential in generating accurate deep learning models for time series data analysis and can benefit data analysts seeking efficient prediction model development using generative AIs.

• - Comparison of four Large Language Models (LLMs) - ChatGPT, PaLM, LLama, and Falcon - in generating deep learning models for time series data analysis
• - Importance of time series data in domains like finance and stock markets
• - Controlled experiments using adjusted prompts based on various criteria
• - LLMs' ability to generate executable codes for each dataset separately and perform comparably to manually crafted LSTM models
• - ChatGPT identified as the top performer among tested LLMs
• - Impact of "temperature" parameter on model quality
• - Insights on Falcon's tailored tools and efficient data flow approach
• - LLama-2's range of pretrained models with excellent discourse capabilities
• - Potential of LLMs in generating accurate deep learning models for time series data analysis

Summary- Four different big computer programs were compared to see which one is best at making smart models for looking at data that changes over time. - Data that shows how things change over time is really important, especially in areas like money and the stock market. - Scientists did special tests where they changed the questions a bit to see which program worked best in different situations. - These big computer programs can write instructions for each set of data by themselves and do just as well as models made by people. - One of the programs, called ChatGPT, was found to be the best out of all those tested. Definitions- Large Language Models (LLMs): Big computer programs that are really good at understanding and working with language. - Time series data: Information that shows how things change over time, like stock prices going up and down. - Executable codes: Instructions written by a computer program that can be directly run or executed to perform tasks. - LSTM models: A type of deep learning model called Long Short-Term Memory, used for analyzing sequences of data.

Introduction: Large Language Models (LLMs) have been gaining attention in recent years for their ability to generate human-like text and perform various natural language processing tasks. However, their potential in generating deep learning models for time series data analysis has not been extensively explored. This research paper aims to compare the performance of four LLMs - ChatGPT, PaLM, LLama, and Falcon - in generating deep learning models for analyzing time series data. Background: Time series data is a sequence of observations collected over time. It is crucial in various domains such as finance and stock markets, where accurate predictions can lead to significant gains or losses. Traditional methods of analyzing time series data involve manually crafting LSTM models, which can be time-consuming and require domain expertise. Therefore, there is a need for more efficient approaches that can automate the process. Methodology: The study conducts controlled experiments using prompts adjusted based on criteria like clarity, specificity, objective, intent, contextual information, and format/style. These prompts serve as inputs to the LLMs to generate executable codes for each dataset separately. The generated codes are then compared with manually crafted LSTM models based on metrics like accuracy and loss. Results: The results show that all four LLMs were able to generate executable codes for each dataset separately with comparable performance to manually crafted LSTM models. However, ChatGPT emerged as the top performer among the tested LLMs with its high accuracy and low loss values. Impact of "Temperature" Parameter: One interesting finding from this study was the impact of the "temperature" parameter on model quality. Temperature refers to how conservative or creative an LLM is when generating responses. Lower temperatures result in more conservative responses while higher temperatures lead to more creative responses. The study found that lower temperatures resulted in better model quality for all four LLMs. Insights on Falcon and LLama-2: While ChatGPT was identified as the top performer, the study also provided insights on Falcon and LLama-2 LLMs. Falcon stood out for its tailored tools and efficient data flow approach, making it a promising option for time series data analysis. On the other hand, LLama-2 offers a range of pretrained models with excellent discourse capabilities, making it suitable for more complex datasets. Conclusion: This research sheds light on the potential of LLMs in generating accurate deep learning models for time series data analysis. It highlights their ability to automate the process and perform comparably to manually crafted LSTM models. The study also provides insights on different LLMs and their strengths in this task. This can benefit data analysts seeking efficient prediction model development using generative AIs. In conclusion, this research paper showcases the potential of LLMs in automating the process of generating deep learning models for time series data analysis. With their ability to generate executable codes and perform comparably to manually crafted LSTM models, LLMs offer an efficient alternative for developing prediction models in domains such as finance and stock markets. Further studies can explore different prompts and criteria to optimize LLM performance in this task even further.