, , , ,
In this study, we address the challenge of evaluating meeting summaries automatically using natural language generation (NLG) systems. Meeting summaries play a crucial role in professional environments by providing references, updates for absentees, and reinforcing key topics discussed during meetings. With the integration of summarization services into popular digital meeting platforms like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet, the importance of generating high-quality meeting summaries has increased significantly. The evaluation of generated meeting summaries is traditionally done through costly and time-consuming human assessment. To overcome this limitation, there is a need for an automatic evaluator that can provide insights along with scoring to enable sophisticated techniques such as feedback-based summary refinement and reinforcement learning from AI feedback. However, established automatic metrics like ROUGE, BERTScore, and BARTScore show a relatively low correlation with human judgment and often fail to detect errors accurately or reflect error impact on summary quality. Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as potential evaluators for text summarization tasks by assigning Likert scores based on predefined guidelines. However, existing LLM-based approaches face limitations in meeting summarization contexts due to oversight of typical errors such as structural presentation issues and coreference problems. Moreover, subjective annotation guidelines may lead to inconsistent interpretations by LLMs, resulting in unreliable evaluations. To address these challenges, we introduce MESA (Meeting Summary Assessor), a multi-stage LLM-based framework designed to mimic human evaluation approaches. MESA operates on three levels: error detection at the individual error type level, multi-agent discussion for decision refinement, and feedback-based self-training to improve error definition understanding and alignment with human judgment. By leveraging GPT-4o as its backbone model, MESA achieves mid to high correlations with human judgment in error detection and reflects error impact on summary quality more accurately than previous methods. Overall, MESA's flexibility in adapting to custom error guidelines makes it suitable for various tasks with limited human-labeled data. The framework enables thorough error detection, consistent rating, and adaptability to custom error definitions while providing valuable insights into meeting summary quality assessment without relying solely on costly human evaluation methods.
- - Meeting summaries are crucial in professional environments for providing references, updates for absentees, and reinforcing key topics discussed during meetings.
- - The integration of summarization services into popular digital meeting platforms has increased the importance of generating high-quality meeting summaries.
- - Traditional evaluation of meeting summaries is done through costly and time-consuming human assessment.
- - Existing automatic metrics like ROUGE, BERTScore, and BARTScore show low correlation with human judgment in evaluating meeting summaries.
- - MESA (Meeting Summary Assessor) is a multi-stage LLM-based framework designed to mimic human evaluation approaches for meeting summary assessment.
SummaryMeeting summaries are important in workplaces for keeping track of what was discussed, updating those who were not there, and remembering key points. Some digital meeting platforms now have tools to help create good meeting summaries. Checking the quality of meeting summaries used to be done by people which took a lot of time and money. Some automatic tools like ROUGE, BERTScore, and BARTScore don't always match up with human judgment when evaluating meeting summaries. MESA is a special computer program that tries to evaluate meeting summaries like humans do.
Definitions- Meeting summaries: Short notes or reports that capture the main points discussed during a meeting.
- Absentees: People who were not present at the meeting.
- Integration: Combining different things together to work as one.
- Evaluation: Assessing or judging something based on specific criteria.
- Framework: A structure or plan that helps organize and guide activities.
Introduction
In today's fast-paced professional world, meetings are an essential part of communication and decision-making processes. With the rise of remote work and virtual meetings, it has become even more crucial to have accurate and comprehensive meeting summaries for reference and updates. However, manually generating these summaries can be time-consuming and costly. To address this issue, natural language generation (NLG) systems have been integrated into popular digital meeting platforms like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet.
The evaluation of generated meeting summaries is traditionally done through human assessment. This process is not only time-consuming but also subjective as different individuals may interpret the quality of a summary differently. Therefore, there is a need for an automatic evaluator that can provide objective insights along with scoring to enable sophisticated techniques such as feedback-based summary refinement and reinforcement learning from AI feedback.
In this research paper, titled "MESA: A Multi-Stage LLM-Based Framework for Meeting Summary Evaluation," the authors propose a framework that aims to mimic human evaluation approaches in assessing the quality of meeting summaries automatically.
The Limitations of Existing Automatic Metrics
Existing automatic metrics like ROUGE, BERTScore, and BARTScore have been widely used in text summarization tasks but show low correlations with human judgment when applied to meeting summaries. These metrics often fail to detect errors accurately or reflect error impact on summary quality due to their focus on content overlap rather than structural presentation issues or coreference problems.
The Emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs)
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as potential evaluators for text summarization tasks by assigning Likert scores based on predefined guidelines. However, existing LLM-based approaches face limitations in meeting summarization contexts due to oversight of typical errors such as structural presentation issues and coreference problems.
Moreover, subjective annotation guidelines may lead to inconsistent interpretations by LLMs, resulting in unreliable evaluations. This highlights the need for a more comprehensive and adaptable framework for meeting summary evaluation.
The MESA Framework
To address these challenges, the authors introduce MESA (Meeting Summary Assessor), a multi-stage LLM-based framework designed to mimic human evaluation approaches. MESA operates on three levels: error detection at the individual error type level, multi-agent discussion for decision refinement, and feedback-based self-training to improve error definition understanding and alignment with human judgment.
The backbone model of MESA is GPT-4o, which has been trained on a large dataset of meeting summaries to understand common errors and their impact on summary quality. By leveraging this model, MESA achieves mid to high correlations with human judgment in error detection and reflects error impact on summary quality more accurately than previous methods.
Flexibility and Adaptability
One of the key strengths of the MESA framework is its flexibility in adapting to custom error guidelines. This makes it suitable for various tasks with limited human-labeled data. The framework enables thorough error detection, consistent rating, and adaptability to custom error definitions while providing valuable insights into meeting summary quality assessment without relying solely on costly human evaluation methods.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the research paper "MESA: A Multi-Stage LLM-Based Framework for Meeting Summary Evaluation" presents an innovative approach to automatically evaluating meeting summaries using large language models. The proposed framework addresses limitations of existing automatic metrics by mimicking human evaluation approaches through multi-stage processing and leveraging GPT-4o as its backbone model.
MESA's ability to detect errors accurately and reflect their impact on summary quality makes it a valuable tool for improving NLG systems' performance in generating high-quality meeting summaries. Its flexibility in adapting to custom guidelines also makes it suitable for various tasks with limited labeled data.
Overall, this research paper contributes to the advancement of meeting summary evaluation and has the potential to improve the efficiency and accuracy of NLG systems in professional environments.