Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2411.16579v1

Training large language models (LLMs) to engage in more thoughtful reflection before responding is essential for effectively tackling complex reasoning tasks in domains such as science, coding, and mathematics. The success of mechanisms like self-reflection and self-correction hinges on the model's ability to accurately evaluate its own performance. However, this can be hindered by factors like initial accuracy, question complexity, and a lack of external feedback. In this study, a two-player framework is explored where reasoning and critique models are separated roles. The critique model provides step-level feedback to supervise the reasoning (actor) model during both test-time and train-time. The researchers introduce AutoMathCritique - an automated and scalable framework designed for collecting critique data. This results in a dataset comprising 76,321 responses paired with detailed step-level feedback. By fine-tuning language models using this dataset, they enable these models to generate natural language feedback for mathematical reasoning tasks. Results demonstrate that the critique models consistently enhance the actor's performance on challenging queries at test-time, particularly when increasing inference-time computation. Building upon these findings, the researchers incorporate critique-based supervision into the actor's self-training process and propose a critique-in-the-loop self-improvement method. Experimental outcomes indicate that this method enhances the actor's exploration efficiency and solution diversity, especially on difficult queries - leading to a more robust reasoning model. Furthermore, the study takes an initial step towards exploring training self-talk reasoning models via critique supervision and showcases its potential benefits. The code and datasets associated with this research are available at https://mathcritique.github.io/. The team behind this work includes Zhiheng Xi, Dingwen Yang, Jixuan Huang,Jiafu Tang,GuanYu Li,Yiwen Ding Wei He Boyang Hong Shihan Do Wenyu Zhan Xiao Wang Rui Zheng Tao Ji Xiaowei Shi Yitao Zhai Rongxiang Weng Jingang Wang Xunliang Cai Tao Gui Zuxuan Wu Qi Zhang among others.

• - Training large language models (LLMs) for complex reasoning tasks in domains like science, coding, and mathematics requires thoughtful reflection before responding.
• - Success of self-reflection and self-correction mechanisms depends on the model's ability to evaluate its own performance accurately.
• - Factors hindering accurate evaluation include initial accuracy, question complexity, and lack of external feedback.
• - A two-player framework is explored where critique models provide step-level feedback to supervise reasoning models during test-time and train-time.
• - AutoMathCritique is introduced as an automated framework for collecting critique data, resulting in a dataset with detailed step-level feedback paired with responses.
• - Fine-tuning language models using this dataset enables natural language feedback generation for mathematical reasoning tasks.
• - Critique models consistently enhance actor's performance on challenging queries at test-time, especially with increased inference-time computation.
• - Incorporating critique-based supervision into actor's self-training process leads to enhanced exploration efficiency and solution diversity on difficult queries - resulting in a more robust reasoning model.
• - The study explores training self-talk reasoning models via critique supervision and highlights potential benefits.

Summary1. Training big language models for hard tasks like science, coding, and math needs careful thinking before answering. 2. The model's success in correcting itself depends on how well it can judge its own performance. 3. Things that make judging accuracy difficult include how accurate the model was at first, how hard the question is, and not getting feedback from outside. 4. A way to help models get better is by having other models give them feedback during tests and training. 5. AutoMathCritique is a system that collects detailed feedback to help improve language models for math problems. Definitions- Language Models: Programs that understand and generate human language. - Self-reflection: Thinking about your own thoughts and actions. - Accuracy: How correct something is compared to what it should be. - Feedback: Information given to help improve or evaluate something. - Dataset: A collection of data used for analysis or research.

Introduction: In recent years, there has been a surge in the development of large language models (LLMs) that can generate human-like text. These models have shown impressive performance in various natural language processing tasks such as machine translation, question-answering, and text summarization. However, when it comes to more complex reasoning tasks in domains like science, coding, and mathematics, these models often struggle due to their lack of understanding and ability to engage in thoughtful reflection. The success of mechanisms like self-reflection and self-correction hinges on the model's ability to accurately evaluate its own performance. This is where the research paper "Training Large Language Models for Thoughtful Reflection" comes into play. In this study, a team of researchers explores a two-player framework where reasoning and critique models are separated roles. The critique model provides step-level feedback to supervise the reasoning model during both test-time and train-time. Challenges Faced by LLMs: There are several challenges faced by LLMs when it comes to engaging in thoughtful reflection before responding. One major challenge is their initial accuracy - since these models are trained on large datasets with minimal supervision, they may not have a strong foundation for accurate reasoning. Additionally, complex questions or queries can also pose difficulties for LLMs as they may not have enough context or knowledge about the topic at hand. Another significant challenge is the lack of external feedback during training - most existing datasets do not provide detailed step-level feedback which is crucial for improving reflective abilities. This leads to limited opportunities for these models to learn from their mistakes and improve over time. Introducing AutoMathCritique: To address these challenges and enable LLMs to engage in more thoughtful reflection before responding, the researchers introduce AutoMathCritique - an automated and scalable framework designed for collecting critique data specifically for mathematical reasoning tasks. This results in a dataset comprising 76,321 responses paired with detailed step-level feedback. The team behind this research has made the code and datasets associated with their work publicly available at https://mathcritique.github.io/, making it accessible for other researchers to use and build upon. Results: Using this dataset, the researchers fine-tune language models and enable them to generate natural language feedback for mathematical reasoning tasks. The results demonstrate that the critique models consistently enhance the actor's performance on challenging queries at test-time, particularly when increasing inference-time computation. This shows that incorporating step-level feedback during both training and testing can significantly improve LLMs' reflective abilities. Critique-in-the-Loop Self-Improvement Method: Building upon these findings, the researchers propose a critique-in-the-loop self-improvement method where they incorporate critique-based supervision into the actor's self-training process. This approach enhances the model's exploration efficiency and solution diversity, especially on difficult queries - leading to a more robust reasoning model. Exploring Training Self-Talk Reasoning Models: Furthermore, this study takes an initial step towards exploring training self-talk reasoning models via critique supervision. This is a promising area of research as it could potentially lead to even more advanced LLMs that can engage in meaningful dialogue and reflection before responding. Conclusion: In conclusion, "Training Large Language Models for Thoughtful Reflection" highlights the importance of engaging in thoughtful reflection before responding in complex reasoning tasks. By introducing AutoMathCritique - an automated framework for collecting detailed step-level feedback - and incorporating it into both training and testing processes, this research enables LLMs to improve their reflective abilities significantly. The proposed critique-in-the-loop self-improvement method also showcases its potential benefits in enhancing exploration efficiency and solution diversity on difficult queries. With further advancements in training self-talk reasoning models through critique supervision, we may see even more impressive results from large language models in various domains.