Balancing Continuous Pre-Training and Instruction Fine-Tuning: Optimizing Instruction-Following in LLMs

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Continuous Pre-training Instruction Fine-tuning Instruction-following Abilities Compute-efficient Strategy

AI-generated Key Points

  • Continuous pre-training is crucial for optimal performance of Large Language Models (LLMs)
  • LLMs are introduced as Base LLMs and instruction-refined LLMs
  • Determining which model should undergo continuous pre-training is a challenge
  • The study explores the relationship between continuous pre-training and instruction fine-tuning of LLMs
  • Instruction fine-tuning requires hand-annotated examples and is computationally intensive
  • The goal is to identify a compute-efficient strategy to improve instruction-following capabilities without specific instruction data
  • Datasets used for tuning include LLaMa, Qwen, and other state-of-the-art (SoTA) LLMs
  • Evaluation dataset categorization includes language understanding, reasoning, problem-solving, truthfulness assessment, etc.
  • A comprehensive test dataset from EleutherAI ensures unbiased evaluation results and reproducibility
  • Manual scraping of new articles was conducted to avoid data contamination concerns
  • The study provides empirical evidence on the impact of continuous pre-training on maintaining up-to-date knowledge and improving instruction-following capabilities in LLMs
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ishan Jindal, Chandana Badrinath, Pranjal Bharti, Lakkidi Vinay, Sachin Dev Sharma

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) for public use require continuous pre-training to remain up-to-date with the latest data. The models also need to be fine-tuned with specific instructions to maintain their ability to follow instructions accurately. Typically, LLMs are released in two versions: the Base LLM, pre-trained on diverse data, and the instruction-refined LLM, additionally trained with specific instructions for better instruction following. The question arises as to which model should undergo continuous pre-training to maintain its instruction-following abilities while also staying current with the latest data. In this study, we delve into the intricate relationship between continuous pre-training and instruction fine-tuning of the LLMs and investigate the impact of continuous pre-training on the instruction following abilities of both the base and its instruction finetuned model. Further, the instruction fine-tuning process is computationally intense and requires a substantial number of hand-annotated examples for the model to learn effectively. This study aims to find the most compute-efficient strategy to gain up-to-date knowledge and instruction-following capabilities without requiring any instruction data and fine-tuning. We empirically prove our findings on the LLaMa 3, 3.1 and Qwen 2, 2.5 family of base and instruction models, providing a comprehensive exploration of our hypotheses across varying sizes of pre-training data corpus and different LLMs settings.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Oct. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2410.10739v1

In the realm of Large Language Models (LLMs), the need for continuous pre-training is crucial for optimal performance. This ensures that models stay up-to-date with the latest data and have accurate instruction-following capabilities. LLMs are typically introduced in two versions: Base LLMs, which are pre-trained on a diverse set of data, and instruction-refined LLMs, which undergo additional training with specific instructions to enhance their instruction-following abilities. The challenge lies in determining which model should undergo continuous pre-training to maintain both its instruction-following skills and stay current with new data. This study delves into the intricate relationship between continuous pre-training and instruction fine-tuning of LLMs. It aims to investigate how continuous pre-training impacts the instruction-following abilities of both base models and their instruction-finetuned counterparts. Instruction fine-tuning is computationally intensive and requires a significant number of hand-annotated examples for effective learning. The goal is to identify the most compute-efficient strategy to acquire up-to-date knowledge and improve instruction-following capabilities without relying on specific instruction data and fine-tuning. To address this challenge, the study explores datasets used for tuning LLaMa, Qwen, and other state-of-the-art (SoTA) LLMs. It's important to note that these instruction fine-tuning datasets are not publicly shared due to confidentiality reasons. In this work, "instruction following capabilities" and "instruction capabilities" are used interchangeably. The evaluation dataset categorization includes various subcategories such as language understanding, reasoning and problem-solving, truthfulness assessment, factual knowledge evaluation through benchmarks like IFEval, MMLU-Pro, GSM8K, Winogrande among others. To ensure unbiased evaluation results and reproducibility,a comprehensive test dataset is utilized using an evaluation harness framework from EleutherAI. This dataset focuses on assessing different capabilities including Instruction Following Evaluation (IFEval), which consists of verifiable instructions aimed at testing natural language instruction following abilities of LLMs across various metrics. Furthermore, in order to continuously pre-train models without data contamination concerns from existing datasets as highlighted by previous studies like Jiang et al., manual scraping of approximately 2 million articles was conducted using a static news crawler called FUNDUS. These articles were specifically selected based on being new to LLaMa 3.1 models within a specified date range from December 2023 to September 2024. Overall, this study provides empirical evidence on the impact of continuous pre-training on maintaining up-to-date knowledge and improving instruction-following capabilities in LLMs across different settings and sizes of pre-training data corpus for base models as well as their refined counterparts.
Created on 02 Nov. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.