Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2410.07869v3

, , , , In their paper titled "Benchmarking Agentic Workflow Generation," authors Shuofei Qiao, Runnan Fang, Zhisong Qiu, Xiaobin Wang, Ningyu Zhang, Yong Jiang, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang, and Huajun Chen delve into the realm of Large Language Models (LLMs) and their remarkable capacity to tackle a diverse array of tasks. These LLMs have spearheaded significant progress in addressing reasoning and planning challenges by breaking down complex problems into actionable workflows. However, existing workflow evaluation frameworks have been criticized for either focusing solely on overall performance metrics or facing limitations such as narrow scenario coverage, simplistic workflow structures, and lenient evaluation criteria. To address these shortcomings, the authors introduce WorfBench—a unified benchmark for workflow generation that encompasses multifaceted scenarios and intricate graph-based workflow structures. Additionally, they present WorfEval—a systematic evaluation protocol that leverages subsequence and subgraph matching algorithms to precisely assess the LLM agent's proficiency in generating workflows. Through extensive evaluations across various types of LLMs, the researchers uncover notable disparities between the sequence planning capabilities and graph planning abilities of LLM agents. Surprisingly, even GPT-4 exhibits a discernible gap of approximately 15% in this regard. Furthermore, the authors train two open-source models and evaluate their generalization capabilities on unseen tasks. They also observe that the generated workflows have the potential to enhance downstream tasks, enabling them to achieve superior performance with reduced inference time. The code and dataset associated with this research are openly available on GitHub at https://github.com/zjunlp/WorfBench. This study was presented at ICLR 2025 and sheds light on the evolving landscape of agentic workflow generation within the realm of advanced language models.

• - Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of addressing reasoning and planning challenges by breaking down complex problems into actionable workflows.
• - Existing workflow evaluation frameworks have limitations such as narrow scenario coverage, simplistic workflow structures, and lenient evaluation criteria.
• - The authors introduce WorfBench—a unified benchmark for workflow generation that encompasses multifaceted scenarios and intricate graph-based workflow structures.
• - WorfEval is a systematic evaluation protocol that leverages subsequence and subgraph matching algorithms to assess the proficiency of LLM agents in generating workflows accurately.
• - Notable disparities between sequence planning capabilities and graph planning abilities of LLM agents were uncovered through extensive evaluations, with even GPT-4 exhibiting a gap of approximately 15% in this regard.
• - Generated workflows have the potential to enhance downstream tasks, leading to superior performance with reduced inference time.

SummaryLarge Language Models (LLMs) are like smart helpers that can solve big problems by breaking them into smaller steps. A new tool called WorfBench helps test how well these helpers can plan and think through tasks. It found that some helpers are better at making lists of steps, while others are better at drawing out plans like maps. By using these tools, we can make our work faster and better. Definitions- Large Language Models (LLMs): Advanced computer programs that can understand and generate human language. - Workflow: A series of steps or tasks needed to complete a job or project. - Benchmark: A standard or reference point used for comparison or evaluation. - Protocol: A set of rules or guidelines for how something should be done. - Proficiency: Skillfulness or expertise in doing something accurately and effectively.

Introduction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been making significant strides in addressing complex reasoning and planning tasks by breaking them down into actionable workflows. However, existing evaluation frameworks for these LLMs have been criticized for their narrow scenario coverage, simplistic workflow structures, and lenient evaluation criteria. To address these shortcomings, the authors of "Benchmarking Agentic Workflow Generation" introduce WorfBench—a unified benchmark for workflow generation that encompasses multifaceted scenarios and intricate graph-based workflow structures.

The Need for a Unified Benchmark

The authors highlight the limitations of existing evaluation frameworks that either focus solely on overall performance metrics or face constraints such as narrow scenario coverage and simplistic workflow structures. These limitations hinder the accurate assessment of an LLM agent's capabilities in generating workflows. WorfBench aims to overcome these challenges by providing a comprehensive benchmark that covers diverse scenarios and complex graph-based workflows.

WorfEval: A Systematic Evaluation Protocol

To evaluate the proficiency of LLM agents in generating workflows, the authors present WorfEval—a systematic evaluation protocol that leverages subsequence and subgraph matching algorithms. This protocol enables precise assessment of an LLM agent's sequence planning capabilities as well as its ability to handle more complex graph-based workflows.

Evaluating Different Types of LLMs

Through extensive evaluations across various types of LLMs, including GPT-4, the researchers uncover notable disparities between sequence planning capabilities and graph planning abilities. Surprisingly, even GPT-4 exhibits a discernible gap of approximately 15% in this regard. This finding highlights the need for more comprehensive benchmarks like WorfBench to accurately assess an LLM agent's capabilities.

Generalization Capabilities on Unseen Tasks

In addition to evaluating different types of LLMs on known tasks, the authors also train two open-source models and evaluate their generalization capabilities on unseen tasks. They observe that the generated workflows have the potential to enhance downstream tasks, enabling them to achieve superior performance with reduced inference time.

Open-Source Code and Dataset

To promote further research in this area, the code and dataset associated with this research are openly available on GitHub at https://github.com/zjunlp/WorfBench. This allows other researchers to replicate the experiments and build upon this work.

Conclusion

In conclusion, "Benchmarking Agentic Workflow Generation" presents a unified benchmark for workflow generation that addresses the limitations of existing evaluation frameworks. Through extensive evaluations across various types of LLMs, the authors uncover notable disparities between sequence planning capabilities and graph planning abilities. The study also highlights how generated workflows can enhance downstream tasks and reduce inference time. The availability of open-source code and dataset further promotes future research in this area.