Comparative Analysis of Novel View Synthesis and Photogrammetry for 3D Forest Stand Reconstruction and extraction of individual tree parameters

AI-generated keywords: Forest resource assessments

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Accurate and efficient 3D reconstruction of trees is essential for forest resource assessments and management.
  • Close-Range Photogrammetry (CRP) has been a common method but faces challenges like low efficiency and poor quality.
  • Novel View Synthesis (NVS) technologies such as Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) offer promising alternatives for 3D plant reconstruction using limited images.
  • A study by Guoji Tian, Chongcheng Chen, and Hongyu Huang compared NeRF and 3DGS techniques with photogrammetry and laser scanning for reconstructing forest scenes, showing significant enhancements in efficiency with NVS methods.
  • NeRF excelled in capturing canopy regions accurately but had errors in ground areas; 3DGS generated sparser point clouds impacting DBH measurements accuracy; all methods successfully extracted tree height information with NeRF being most accurate in this aspect.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Guoji Tian, Chongcheng Chen, Hongyu Huang

31page,15figures

Abstract: Accurate and efficient 3D reconstruction of trees is crucial for forest resource assessments and management. Close-Range Photogrammetry (CRP) is commonly used for reconstructing forest scenes but faces challenges like low efficiency and poor quality. Recently, Novel View Synthesis (NVS) technologies, including Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS), have shown promise for 3D plant reconstruction with limited images. However, existing research mainly focuses on small plants in orchards or individual trees, leaving uncertainty regarding their application in larger, complex forest stands. In this study, we collected sequential images of forest plots with varying complexity and performed dense reconstruction using NeRF and 3DGS. The resulting point clouds were compared with those from photogrammetry and laser scanning. Results indicate that NVS methods significantly enhance reconstruction efficiency. Photogrammetry struggles with complex stands, leading to point clouds with excessive canopy noise and incorrectly reconstructed trees, such as duplicated trunks. NeRF, while better for canopy regions, may produce errors in ground areas with limited views. The 3DGS method generates sparser point clouds, particularly in trunk areas, affecting diameter at breast height (DBH) accuracy. All three methods can extract tree height information, with NeRF yielding the highest accuracy; however, photogrammetry remains superior for DBH accuracy. These findings suggest that NVS methods have significant potential for 3D reconstruction of forest stands, offering valuable support for complex forest resource inventory and visualization tasks.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Oct. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2410.05772v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , In the field of forest resource assessments and management, accurate and efficient 3D reconstruction of trees is essential. Close-Range Photogrammetry (CRP) has been a common method for reconstructing forest scenes; however, it often encounters challenges such as low efficiency and poor quality. Recently, Novel View Synthesis (NVS) technologies like Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) have emerged as promising alternatives for 3D plant reconstruction using limited images. To address this gap, a study conducted by Guoji Tian, Chongcheng Chen, and Hongyu Huang collected sequential images of forest plots with varying levels of complexity. Dense reconstructions were performed using NeRF and 3DGS techniques, with the resulting point clouds compared to those obtained through photogrammetry and laser scanning. The findings from this comparative analysis revealed significant enhancements in reconstruction efficiency when utilizing NVS methods. Photogrammetry struggled particularly with complex forest stands, resulting in point clouds with excessive canopy noise and inaccurately reconstructed trees including duplicated trunks. While NeRF excelled in capturing canopy regions accurately, it sometimes produced errors in ground areas with limited views. On the other hand, the 3DGS method generated sparser point clouds especially in trunk areas which impacted the accuracy of diameter at breast height (DBH) measurements. Despite these differences, all three methods were able to extract tree height information successfully, with NeRF demonstrating the highest accuracy in this aspect. However, photogrammetry still outperformed the NVS methods when it came to DBH accuracy. These results suggest that Novel View Synthesis technologies hold significant potential for 3D reconstruction of complex forest stands, providing valuable support for tasks related to forest resource inventory and visualization. The study sheds light on the strengths and limitations of different reconstruction techniques in capturing detailed information about individual trees within diverse forest environments.
Created on 28 Dec. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.