LLaVA-Critic: Learning to Evaluate Multimodal Models
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors introduce LLaVA-Critic as the first open-source large multimodal model (LMM) designed for versatile evaluation across various tasks.
- Model trained using high-quality critic instruction-following dataset covering a wide range of evaluation criteria and scenarios.
- LLaVA-Critic showcased efficacy in two key areas:
- LMM-as-a-Judge: Provides reliable evaluation scores comparable to or surpassing GPT models on multiple benchmarks.
- Preference Learning: Generates reward signals for preference learning, enhancing model alignment capabilities.
- Significance of open-source LMMs emphasized in facilitating self-critique and evaluation processes.
- Potential of LLaVA-Critic demonstrated in providing valuable feedback mechanisms for large multimodal models, paving the way for scalable and superhuman alignment feedback mechanisms.
- Research contributes to advancing multimodal model evaluation field and highlights importance of leveraging open-source resources for improving model performance and alignment capabilities.
Authors: Tianyi Xiong, Xiyao Wang, Dong Guo, Qinghao Ye, Haoqi Fan, Quanquan Gu, Heng Huang, Chunyuan Li
Abstract: We introduce LLaVA-Critic, the first open-source large multimodal model (LMM) designed as a generalist evaluator to assess performance across a wide range of multimodal tasks. LLaVA-Critic is trained using a high-quality critic instruction-following dataset that incorporates diverse evaluation criteria and scenarios. Our experiments demonstrate the model's effectiveness in two key areas: (1) LMM-as-a-Judge, where LLaVA-Critic provides reliable evaluation scores, performing on par with or surpassing GPT models on multiple evaluation benchmarks; and (2) Preference Learning, where it generates reward signals for preference learning, enhancing model alignment capabilities. This work underscores the potential of open-source LMMs in self-critique and evaluation, setting the stage for future research into scalable, superhuman alignment feedback mechanisms for LMMs.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.