Attention in Large Language Models Yields Efficient Zero-Shot Re-Rankers

AI-generated keywords: Information Retrieval

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly important in information retrieval systems, especially in generative AI and retrieval-augmented generation.
  • Existing LLM-based re-ranking methods heavily rely on autoregressive generation, limiting their applicability to specialized or proprietary models.
  • In-context re-ranking (ICR) is a novel approach that leverages changes in attention patterns induced by search queries for accurate and efficient re-ranking without autoregressive generation.
  • ICR requires only two forward passes to re-rank N documents compared to generative methods that demand at least O(N) forward passes, making it more efficient.
  • ICR can be applied to any LLM without specialized training and ensures a well-formed ranking output.
  • Experiments show that ICR outperforms RankGPT in performance while reducing latency by over 60% in practical scenarios, particularly excelling in tasks requiring complex re-ranking signals.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Shijie Chen, Bernal Jiménez Gutiérrez, Yu Su

Abstract: Information retrieval (IR) systems have played a vital role in modern digital life and have cemented their continued usefulness in this new era of generative AI via retrieval-augmented generation. With strong language processing capabilities and remarkable versatility, large language models (LLMs) have become popular choices for zero-shot re-ranking in IR systems. So far, LLM-based re-ranking methods rely on strong generative capabilities, which restricts their use to either specialized or powerful proprietary models. Given these restrictions, we ask: is autoregressive generation necessary and optimal for LLMs to perform re-ranking? We hypothesize that there are abundant signals relevant to re-ranking within LLMs that might not be used to their full potential via generation. To more directly leverage such signals, we propose in-context re-ranking (ICR), a novel method that leverages the change in attention pattern caused by the search query for accurate and efficient re-ranking. To mitigate the intrinsic biases in LLMs, we propose a calibration method using a content-free query. Due to the absence of generation, ICR only requires two ($O(1)$) forward passes to re-rank $N$ documents, making it substantially more efficient than generative re-ranking methods that require at least $O(N)$ forward passes. Our novel design also enables ICR to be applied to any LLM without specialized training while guaranteeing a well-formed ranking. Extensive experiments with two popular open-weight LLMs on standard single-hop and multi-hop information retrieval benchmarks show that ICR outperforms RankGPT while cutting the latency by more than 60% in practice. Through detailed analyses, we show that ICR's performance is specially strong on tasks that require more complex re-ranking signals. Our findings call for further exploration on novel ways of utilizing open-weight LLMs beyond text generation.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Oct. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2410.02642v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , In the realm of information retrieval (IR) systems, the role of large language models (LLMs) has become increasingly prominent. This is especially true in the era of generative AI and retrieval-augmented generation. These LLMs boast powerful language processing capabilities and remarkable versatility, making them popular choices for zero-shot re-ranking within IR systems. However, existing LLM-based re-ranking methods heavily rely on autoregressive generation, which limits their applicability to specialized or proprietary models. This raises the question: is autoregressive generation truly necessary and optimal for LLMs to excel in re-ranking tasks? To address this query, a novel approach called in-context re-ranking (ICR) is proposed. Unlike traditional generative methods, ICR leverages the change in attention patterns induced by search queries to achieve accurate and efficient re-ranking without relying on autoregressive generation. Additionally, a calibration method using content-free queries is introduced to mitigate intrinsic biases in LLMs. One key advantage of ICR is its efficiency - requiring only two ($O(1)$) forward passes to re-rank $N$ documents compared to generative methods that demand at least $O(N)$ forward passes. Moreover, ICR can be seamlessly applied to any LLM without specialized training while ensuring a well-formed ranking output. Extensive experiments conducted with two popular open-weight LLMs on standard single-hop and multi-hop information retrieval benchmarks demonstrate that ICR surpasses RankGPT in performance while reducing latency by over 60% in practical scenarios. Detailed analyses further reveal that ICR excels particularly in tasks necessitating complex re-ranking signals. These findings underscore the potential for exploring innovative ways of harnessing open-weight LLMs beyond text generation applications. The development of ICR represents a significant step towards maximizing the utility of LLMs in information retrieval tasks by leveraging inherent signals within these models more effectively than traditional generative approaches.
Created on 11 Oct. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.