Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2409.13373v1

In their paper titled "LLMs Still Can't Plan; Can LRMs? A Preliminary Evaluation of OpenAI's o1 on PlanBench," authors Karthik Valmeekam, Kaya Stechly, and Subbarao Kambhampati delve into the realm of large language models (LLMs) and their planning abilities. The ability to plan a course of action to achieve a desired state has long been considered a fundamental skill of intelligent agents in AI research. With the rise of LLMs, there has been significant interest in determining whether these models possess such planning capabilities. The authors highlight the development of PlanBench in 2022 as a crucial benchmark for evaluating the planning abilities of LLMs, particularly following the release of GPT3. Despite the emergence of numerous new private and open-source LLMs post-GPT3, progress on this benchmark has been slow. OpenAI introduces their o1 (Strawberry) model as a Large Reasoning Model (LRM), specifically designed to surpass the limitations of traditional autoregressive LLMs. The paper conducts a comprehensive evaluation to assess how well current LLMs and new LRMs perform on PlanBench. While OpenAI's o1 model demonstrates significant improvement on the benchmark compared to its competitors, it falls short of fully saturating it. This advancement raises important considerations regarding accuracy, efficiency, and guarantees that must be addressed before deploying such systems. Overall, the study sheds light on the ongoing debate surrounding LLMs' planning abilities and introduces OpenAI's innovative approach with the o1 model as a potential solution to enhance reasoning capabilities within these models. The findings underscore the need for continued research and development in this area to unlock the full potential of large language models in planning tasks.

• - Large language models (LLMs) and their planning abilities are a focus of the study
• - PlanBench introduced in 2022 as a benchmark for evaluating LLMs' planning capabilities
• - OpenAI's o1 model, a Large Reasoning Model (LRM), designed to surpass traditional autoregressive LLMs
• - Evaluation shows o1 model outperforms competitors on PlanBench but does not fully saturate it
• - Important considerations raised regarding accuracy, efficiency, and guarantees before deploying such systems
• - Study highlights ongoing debate on LLMs' planning abilities and introduces o1 model as an innovative solution to enhance reasoning capabilities within these models
• - Emphasizes the need for continued research and development to unlock full potential of large language models in planning tasks

Summary- Big talking computers and how well they can plan are being studied. - PlanBench was made in 2022 to test how good these big talking computers are at planning. - OpenAI's o1 model is a special type of big talking computer that is supposed to be better than others. - The o1 model did well on PlanBench but still has room to improve. - People need to think about how accurate, efficient, and reliable these systems are before using them. Definitions- Large language models (LLMs): Big computers that understand and generate human language. - Planning abilities: How well a computer can make decisions and figure out what to do next. - Benchmark: A standard or test used for comparing different things. - Autoregressive: A type of model that predicts the next word based on previous words in a sequence. - Reasoning capabilities: The ability to think logically and solve problems.

Introduction: The field of artificial intelligence (AI) has long been fascinated with the concept of planning - the ability to anticipate and execute a sequence of actions to achieve a desired goal. With the rise of large language models (LLMs), there has been significant interest in determining whether these models possess such planning capabilities. In their paper titled "LLMs Still Can't Plan; Can LRMs? A Preliminary Evaluation of OpenAI's o1 on PlanBench," authors Karthik Valmeekam, Kaya Stechly, and Subbarao Kambhampati delve into this debate by evaluating the performance of LLMs and Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) on the newly developed benchmark, PlanBench. Background: The development of PlanBench in 2022 marked a crucial milestone for evaluating the planning abilities of LLMs, particularly following the release of GPT3. This benchmark was designed to test an AI system's ability to plan in complex environments by providing it with a set of tasks that require reasoning and decision-making skills. However, progress on this benchmark has been slow despite numerous new private and open-source LLMs emerging post-GPT3. OpenAI's o1 Model: In response to this challenge, OpenAI introduces their o1 (Strawberry) model as an LRM specifically designed to surpass traditional autoregressive LLMs' limitations. The o1 model is trained using a combination of supervised learning from human demonstrations and reinforcement learning techniques. It also incorporates external knowledge sources such as Wikipedia articles and webpages during training. Evaluation Methodology: To assess how well current LLMs and new LRMs perform on PlanBench, the authors conduct a comprehensive evaluation using three metrics: accuracy, efficiency, and guarantees. Accuracy measures how well an AI system performs compared to human-level performance on each task. Efficiency evaluates how quickly an AI system can complete a task, and guarantees measure the system's ability to generalize to unseen tasks. Results: The results of the evaluation show that OpenAI's o1 model outperforms its competitors on PlanBench, demonstrating significant improvement in accuracy and efficiency. However, it falls short of fully saturating the benchmark, highlighting the need for continued research and development in this area. Implications: The findings of this study raise important considerations regarding LLMs' planning abilities and introduce OpenAI's innovative approach with the o1 model as a potential solution to enhance reasoning capabilities within these models. The authors also discuss potential applications for such models, such as improving natural language understanding and dialogue systems. Conclusion: In conclusion, "LLMs Still Can't Plan; Can LRMs? A Preliminary Evaluation of OpenAI's o1 on PlanBench" sheds light on the ongoing debate surrounding LLMs' planning abilities and introduces an exciting new direction with OpenAI's o1 model. While there is still much progress to be made before deploying such systems in real-world scenarios, this study highlights the potential for further advancements in large language models' reasoning capabilities.