A Practitioner's Guide to Continual Multimodal Pretraining

AI-generated keywords: Multimodal foundation models model obsolescence continual pretraining FoMo-in-Flux benchmark practical deployment

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Multimodal foundation models face the challenge of model obsolescence despite extensive pretraining on vast datasets.
  • Research into continual pretraining has focused on infrequent updates on large-scale new data or frequent sample-level updates.
  • Practical deployment often requires adaptation to specific subdomains, tasks, or concepts throughout a model's lifecycle, creating a complex landscape for continual model updates.
  • FoMo-in-Flux is introduced as a benchmark for continual multimodal pretraining with realistic compute constraints and practical deployment requirements.
  • FoMo-in-Flux is constructed over 63 datasets with diverse visual and semantic coverage, serving as a test bed for exploring practical continual pretraining nuances.
  • The investigation includes data mixtures, stream orderings reflecting real-world situations, method-centric approaches like fine-tuning and parameter-efficient updates, meta learning rate schedules, mechanistic design choices, and the impact of model and compute scaling.
  • A practitioner's guide to continual multimodal pretraining for real-world deployment is provided based on insights gained from the exploration.
  • The benchmark and accompanying code are available for further research and application in the field.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Karsten Roth, Vishaal Udandarao, Sebastian Dziadzio, Ameya Prabhu, Mehdi Cherti, Oriol Vinyals, Olivier Hénaff, Samuel Albanie, Matthias Bethge, Zeynep Akata

Technical Report. 52 pages

Abstract: Multimodal foundation models serve numerous applications at the intersection of vision and language. Still, despite being pretrained on extensive data, they become outdated over time. To keep models updated, research into continual pretraining mainly explores scenarios with either (1) infrequent, indiscriminate updates on large-scale new data, or (2) frequent, sample-level updates. However, practical model deployment often operates in the gap between these two limit cases, as real-world applications often demand adaptation to specific subdomains, tasks or concepts -- spread over the entire, varying life cycle of a model. In this work, we complement current perspectives on continual pretraining through a research test bed as well as provide comprehensive guidance for effective continual model updates in such scenarios. We first introduce FoMo-in-Flux, a continual multimodal pretraining benchmark with realistic compute constraints and practical deployment requirements, constructed over 63 datasets with diverse visual and semantic coverage. Using FoMo-in-Flux, we explore the complex landscape of practical continual pretraining through multiple perspectives: (1) A data-centric investigation of data mixtures and stream orderings that emulate real-world deployment situations, (2) a method-centric investigation ranging from simple fine-tuning and traditional continual learning strategies to parameter-efficient updates and model merging, (3) meta learning rate schedules and mechanistic design choices, and (4) the influence of model and compute scaling. Together, our insights provide a practitioner's guide to continual multimodal pretraining for real-world deployment. Our benchmark and code is here: https://github.com/ExplainableML/fomo_in_flux.

Submitted to arXiv on 26 Aug. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2408.14471v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the realm of multimodal foundation models that bridge the gap between vision and language, the challenge of model obsolescence over time looms large despite their extensive pretraining on vast datasets. To address this issue, research into continual pretraining has predominantly focused on two scenarios: infrequent updates on large-scale new data or frequent sample-level updates. However, practical deployment often necessitates adaptation to specific subdomains, tasks, or concepts throughout a model's lifecycle, presenting a complex landscape for continual model updates. In response to these challenges, this work introduces FoMo-in-Flux, a benchmark for continual multimodal pretraining designed with realistic compute constraints and practical deployment requirements. Constructed over 63 datasets with diverse visual and semantic coverage, FoMo-in-Flux serves as a test bed for exploring the nuances of practical continual pretraining. The investigation delves into various perspectives including data mixtures and stream orderings mirroring real-world deployment situations, method-centric approaches ranging from fine-tuning to parameter-efficient updates and model merging, meta learning rate schedules, mechanistic design choices, as well as the impact of model and compute scaling. Through comprehensive insights gained from this exploration, a practitioner's guide to continual multimodal pretraining for real-world deployment is provided. This guide offers valuable guidance on navigating the complexities of updating models in dynamic environments where adaptation to specific subdomains or tasks is crucial. The benchmark along with accompanying code is made available for further research and application in the field.
Created on 04 Sep. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.