Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2408.13915v1

In this study, we present a novel bootstrapping framework that utilizes self-generated feedback to improve the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in detecting betrayal and deception in Diplomacy games. The framework comprises three stages: suggestion, feedback collection, and modification. Initially, a cost-effective language model generates predictions based on the game state and dialogue. Subsequently, a more advanced language model refines these predictions using auto-generated feedback. Our research compared the effectiveness of LLM-generated feedback with feedback from professional human players and found that LLM-generated feedback exhibited superior quality and significantly enhanced the model's ability to detect lies. This approach achieved an impressive 39% improvement in lying-F1 score without requiring additional training data, rivaling results from state-of-the-art supervised learning techniques. Furthermore, LLM-generated feedback was longer and provided more informative insights about potential missing predictions compared to human feedback. Notably, LLM-generated feedback outperformed human feedback by 29% in lying-F1 score while also being a more cost-effective solution. To better understand their limitations, we conducted an additional human study to identify common errors made by LLMs like GPT-3. We also took into account ethics considerations to ensure that studying deception did not have unintended consequences of improving deception tactics. Our findings suggest that leveraging LLM-generated feedback can enhance model performance and offer an economical alternative for improving lie detection capabilities in natural language tasks. However, it is important to note that OpenAI's GPT-4 model is not yet open-source, limiting access to advanced language models for research purposes. Despite this limitation, our study demonstrates the potential of utilizing LLMs for enhancing reasoning capabilities in detecting deception without major real-world consequences.

• - Novel bootstrapping framework using self-generated feedback to improve reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in detecting betrayal and deception in Diplomacy games
• - Framework comprises three stages: suggestion, feedback collection, and modification
• - LLM-generated feedback showed superior quality and significantly enhanced model's ability to detect lies, achieving a 39% improvement in lying-F1 score without additional training data
• - LLM-generated feedback was longer and more informative compared to human feedback, outperforming human feedback by 29% in lying-F1 score while being more cost-effective
• - Additional human study conducted to identify common errors made by LLMs like GPT-3 and consider ethics considerations
• - Leveraging LLM-generated feedback can enhance model performance and offer an economical alternative for improving lie detection capabilities in natural language tasks

SummaryA new way to help computers get better at figuring out when someone is lying in games has been created. This method uses the computer's own feedback to learn and improve how it detects lies. The process involves giving suggestions, collecting feedback, and making changes based on that feedback. By using this new method, the computer was able to get much better at spotting lies without needing more training data or human help. Definitions- Novel: Something new or original. - Bootstrapping: A method of self-starting or self-improvement. - Framework: A structure or plan for doing something. - Large Language Models (LLMs): Advanced computer programs that understand and generate human language. - Betrayal: When someone breaks trust by being dishonest or disloyal. - Deception: Acting in a misleading or dishonest way to trick others. - Diplomacy games: Games where players negotiate and make deals with each other. - Suggestion: An idea or proposal for consideration. - Feedback: Information given about one's performance or behavior for improvement. - Modification: Making changes or adjustments to something. - Lying-F1 score: A measure of how well a model can detect lies in natural language tasks.

Title: Enhancing Deception Detection in Diplomacy Games Using Large Language Models Introduction: In the world of artificial intelligence, large language models (LLMs) have gained significant attention for their ability to generate human-like text. However, one area where LLMs have struggled is in detecting deception and betrayal in natural language tasks. In this study, we present a novel bootstrapping framework that utilizes self-generated feedback to improve the reasoning abilities of LLMs in detecting betrayal and deception in Diplomacy games. The Framework: Our framework comprises three stages: suggestion, feedback collection, and modification. Initially, a cost-effective language model generates predictions based on the game state and dialogue. Subsequently, a more advanced language model refines these predictions using auto-generated feedback. Comparison with Human Feedback: To evaluate the effectiveness of LLM-generated feedback, we compared it with feedback from professional human players. Our research found that LLM-generated feedback exhibited superior quality and significantly enhanced the model's ability to detect lies. This approach achieved an impressive 39% improvement in lying-F1 score without requiring additional training data, rivaling results from state-of-the-art supervised learning techniques. Furthermore, LLM-generated feedback was longer and provided more informative insights about potential missing predictions compared to human feedback. Notably, LLM-generated feedback outperformed human feedback by 29% in lying-F1 score while also being a more cost-effective solution. Limitations and Ethical Considerations: To better understand their limitations, we conducted an additional human study to identify common errors made by LLMs like GPT-3. We also took into account ethics considerations to ensure that studying deception did not have unintended consequences of improving deception tactics. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that leveraging LLM-generated feedback can enhance model performance and offer an economical alternative for improving lie detection capabilities in natural language tasks. However, it is important to note that OpenAI's GPT-4 model is not yet open-source, limiting access to advanced language models for research purposes. Despite this limitation, our study demonstrates the potential of utilizing LLMs for enhancing reasoning capabilities in detecting deception without major real-world consequences. In conclusion, our novel bootstrapping framework shows promising results in improving the ability of LLMs to detect betrayal and deception in Diplomacy games. With further advancements in large language models and access to more sophisticated models like GPT-4, we can continue to enhance their reasoning abilities and potentially apply them to other real-world scenarios where deception detection is crucial.