End-to-End Cost-Effective Incentive Recommendation under Budget Constraint with Uplift Modeling
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Incentives are crucial for driving user engagement and boosting platform revenue in modern online platforms.
- Uplift modeling is used to effectively allocate incentives to individual customers.
- The multi-choice knapsack problem arises when incentivizing customers within specific budget constraints, aiming to maximize return on investment.
- Traditional two-stage approaches faced challenges in optimal allocation performance due to a gap between stages and overlooking essential domain knowledge.
- The novel End-to-End Cost-Effective Incentive Recommendation (E3IR) model was proposed to address these challenges under budget constraints.
- E3IR consists of two key modules: the uplift prediction module and the differentiable allocation module, integrating integer linear programming (ILP).
- Extensive experiments showed that E3IR significantly enhanced allocation performance compared to existing two-stage approaches.
- The research by Zexu Sun, Hao Yang, Dugang Liu, Yunpeng Weng, Xing Tang, and Xiuqiang He led to an accepted paper at RecSys 2024 conference.
Authors: Zexu Sun, Hao Yang an Dugang Liu, Yunpeng Weng, Xing Tang, Xiuqiang He
Abstract: In modern online platforms, incentives are essential factors that enhance user engagement and increase platform revenue. Over recent years, uplift modeling has been introduced as a strategic approach to assign incentives to individual customers. Especially in many real-world applications, online platforms can only incentivize customers with specific budget constraints. This problem can be reformulated as the multi-choice knapsack problem. This optimization aims to select the optimal incentive for each customer to maximize the return on investment. Recent works in this field frequently tackle the budget allocation problem using a two-stage approach. However, this solution is confronted with the following challenges: (1) The causal inference methods often ignore the domain knowledge in online marketing, where the expected response curve of a customer should be monotonic and smooth as the incentive increases. (2) An optimality gap between the two stages results in inferior sub-optimal allocation performance due to the loss of the incentive recommendation information for the uplift prediction under the limited budget constraint. To address these challenges, we propose a novel End-to-End Cost-Effective Incentive Recommendation (E3IR) model under budget constraints. Specifically, our methods consist of two modules, i.e., the uplift prediction module and the differentiable allocation module. In the uplift prediction module, we construct prediction heads to capture the incremental improvement between adjacent treatments with the marketing domain constraints (i.e., monotonic and smooth). We incorporate integer linear programming (ILP) as a differentiable layer input in the allocation module. Furthermore, we conduct extensive experiments on public and real product datasets, demonstrating that our E3IR improves allocation performance compared to existing two-stage approaches.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.