I-SHEEP: Self-Alignment of LLM from Scratch through an Iterative Self-Enhancement Paradigm

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Artificial General Intelligence Self-Alignment I-SHEEP Paradigm Active Learning

AI-generated Key Points

  • Significant advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have been made, but they still lack autonomous self-regulation and coherent self-understanding similar to human-like Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).
  • Current pretraining and Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) phases treat LLMs as passive repositories of information, neglecting their potential for active learning and alignment.
  • Researchers have developed approaches like Self Instruct, Dromedary, and Magpie to align base models in low-resource settings without heavy reliance on human supervision signals.
  • A new paradigm called I-SHEEP (Iterative Self-Enhancement Paradigm) is introduced to enable LLMs to continuously self-align from scratch without external guidance.
  • I-SHEEP demonstrates significant improvements in Alpaca Eval, MT Bench, and IFEval accuracy over subsequent iterations in the Qwen-1.5 72B model.
  • I-SHEEP surpasses base models in standard benchmark generation tasks with enhancements in code generation tasks, TrivialQA, and SQuAD performance.
  • The framework of I-SHEEP includes four main components: self-synthesize process for generating instruction-pair data, self-assessment to evaluate data quality, filtering component to remove low-quality data based on assessment results, and training component to integrate high-quality data into the base model.
  • Overall, I-SHEEP presents a promising approach towards achieving AGI by enabling LLMs to actively align themselves continuously without external intervention.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yiming Liang, Ge Zhang, Xingwei Qu, Tianyu Zheng, Jiawei Guo, Xinrun Du, Zhenzhu Yang, Jiaheng Liu, Chenghua Lin, Lei Ma, Wenhao Huang, Jiajun Zhang

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved significant advancements, however, the common learning paradigm treats LLMs as passive information repositories, neglecting their potential for active learning and alignment. Some approaches train LLMs using their own generated synthetic data, exploring the possibility of active alignment. However, there is still a huge gap between these one-time alignment methods and the continuous automatic alignment of humans. In this paper, we introduce \textbf{I-SHEEP}, an \textbf{I}terative \textbf{S}elf-En\textbf{H}anc\textbf{E}m\textbf{E}nt \textbf{P}aradigm.This human-like paradigm enables LLMs to \textbf{continuously self-align from scratch with nothing}. Compared to the one-time alignment method Dromedary \cite{sun2023principledriven}, which refers to the first iteration in this paper, I-SHEEP can significantly enhance capacities on both Qwen and Llama models. I-SHEEP achieves a maximum relative improvement of 78.2\% in the Alpaca Eval, 24.0\% in the MT Bench, and an absolute increase of 8.88\% in the IFEval accuracy over subsequent iterations in Qwen-1.5 72B model. Additionally, I-SHEEP surpasses the base model in various standard benchmark generation tasks, achieving an average improvement of 24.77\% in code generation tasks, 12.04\% in TrivialQA, and 20.29\% in SQuAD. We also provide new insights based on the experiment results. Our codes, datasets, and models are available at \textbf{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/I-SHEEP}.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Aug. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2408.08072v1

Significant advancements have been made in the realm of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet they still fall short of achieving the autonomous self-regulation and coherent self-understanding akin to human-like Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The current pretraining and Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) phases treat LLMs as passive repositories of information, overlooking their potential for active learning and alignment. To address this gap, researchers have developed approaches such as Self Instruct, Dromedary, and Magpie to align base models in low-resource settings without heavy reliance on human supervision signals. These methods exhibit some level of proactivity but still lag behind the continuous automatic alignment observed in human learning processes. Inspired by educational research on metacognitive self-assessment's role in continuous alignment for students, a new paradigm called \textbf{I-SHEEP} (\textbf{I}terative \textbf{S}elf-En\textbf{H}anc\textbf{E}m\textbf{E}nt \textbf{P}aradigm) is introduced. This human-like paradigm enables LLMs to continuously self-align from scratch without external guidance. By iteratively enhancing capacities on models like Qwen and Llama, I-SHEEP demonstrates significant improvements in Alpaca Eval, MT Bench, and IFEval accuracy over subsequent iterations in the Qwen-1.5 72B model. Moreover, I-SHEEP surpasses base models in standard benchmark generation tasks with notable enhancements in code generation tasks, TrivialQA, and SQuAD performance. The framework consists of four main components: self-synthesize process for generating instruction-pair data, self-assessment to evaluate data quality, filtering component to remove low-quality data based on assessment results, and training component to integrate high-quality data into the base model. Overall, I-SHEEP presents a promising approach towards achieving AGI by enabling LLMs to actively align themselves continuously without external intervention. The experiment results showcase substantial improvements across various tasks and highlight the potential for further advancements in the field of artificial intelligence research.
Created on 19 Aug. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.