Search for $X(3872)\toπ^0π^0χ_{c1,2}$

Authors: BESIII Collaboration, M. Ablikim, M. N. Achasov, P. Adlarson, O. Afedulidis, X. C. Ai, R. Aliberti, A. Amoroso, Q. An, Y. Bai, O. Bakina, I. Balossino, Y. Ban, H. -R. Bao, V. Batozskaya, K. Begzsuren, N. Berger, M. Berlowski, M. Bertani, D. Bettoni, F. Bianchi, E. Bianco, A. Bortone, I. Boyko, R. A. Briere, A. Brueggemann, H. Cai, X. Cai, A. Calcaterra, G. F. Cao, N. Cao, S. A. Cetin, J. F. Chang, G. R. Che, G. Chelkov, C. Chen, C. H. Chen, Chao Chen, G. Chen, H. S. Chen, H. Y. Chen, M. L. Chen, S. J. Chen, S. L. Chen, S. M. Chen, T. Chen, X. R. Chen, X. T. Chen, Y. B. Chen, Y. Q. Chen, Z. J. Chen, Z. Y. Chen, S. K. Choi, G. Cibinetto, F. Cossio, J. J. Cui, H. L. Dai, J. P. Dai, A. Dbeyssi, R. E. de Boer, D. Dedovich, C. Q. Deng, Z. Y. Deng, A. Denig, I. Denysenko, M. Destefanis, F. De Mori, B. Ding, X. X. Ding, Y. Ding

12 pages, 4 figures, 6 tables
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Using 10.1 fb$^{-1}$ of $e^+e^-$ collision data collected by the BESIII detector with center-of-mass energies between 4.15 GeV and 4.30 GeV, we search for the decays $X(3872)\to\pi^0\pi^0\chi_{c1,2}$, where the $X(3872)$ is produced in $e^+e^-\to\gamma X(3872)$. No evidence above $3\sigma$ is found for either decay. Upper limits at the $90\%$ C.L. on the branching fractions of $X(3872)\to\pi^0\pi^0\chi_{c1,2}$ normalized to the branching fraction of $X(3872)\to\pi^+\pi^-J/\psi$ are set to be $\mathcal{B}(X(3872)\to\pi^0\pi^0\chi_{c1})/\mathcal{B}(X(3872)\to\pi^+\pi^-J/\psi) < 1.1$ and $\mathcal{B}(X(3872)\to\pi^0\pi^0\chi_{c2})/\mathcal{B}(X(3872)\to\pi^+\pi^-J/\psi) < 0.5$, taking into account both statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Aug. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2408.01597v1

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 06 Aug. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.