Jet radius dependence of dijet momentum balance and suppression in Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector

AI-generated keywords: Jet radius dependence

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Detailed analysis of jet radius dependence in dijet momentum balance and suppression in Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV
  • Comparison of results between Pb+Pb collisions and $pp$ collisions using data from ATLAS detector at the LHC
  • Use of varying jet radius parameters (R= 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6) for investigating impact on dijet momentum balance
  • Clear suppression of more balanced dijets in Pb+Pb collisions compared to $pp$ collisions, with an enhancement for more imbalanced dijets
  • Jet radius dependence shows stronger suppression for imbalanced dijets than balanced ones
  • Pair nuclear modification factors indicate subleading jet yields are more suppressed than leading jet yields within dijets
  • Decreasing level of suppression with increasing jet radius observed, highlighting a trend in modification factors based on jet size
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: ATLAS Collaboration

58 pages in total, author list starting page 41, 21 figures, 1 table, submitted to PRC. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/HION-2024-03/

Abstract: This paper describes a measurement of the jet radius dependence of the dijet momentum balance between leading back-to-back jets in 1.72 $nb^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb collisions collected in 2018 and 255 pb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions collected in 2017 by the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Both data sets were collected at $ \sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=$ 5.02 TeV. Jets are reconstructed using the anti-$k_t$ algorithm with jet radius parameters $R=$ 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6. The dijet momentum balance distributions are constructed for leading jets with transverse momentum $p_{\rm T}$ from 100 to 562 GeV for $R=$ 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 jets, and from 158 to 562 GeV for $R=$ 0.5 and 0.6 jets. The absolutely normalized dijet momentum balance distributions are constructed to compare measurements of the dijet yields in Pb+Pb collisions directly to the dijet cross sections in $pp$ collisions. For all jet radii considered here, there is a suppression of more balanced dijets in Pb+Pb collisions compared to $pp$ collisions, while for more imbalanced dijets there is an enhancement. There is a jet radius dependence to the dijet yields, being stronger for more imbalanced dijets than for more balanced dijets. Additionally, jet pair nuclear modification factors are measured. The subleading jet yields are found to be more suppressed than leading jet yields in dijets. A jet radius dependence of the pair nuclear modification factors is observed, with the suppression decreasing with increasing jet radius. These measurements provide new constraints on jet quenching scenarios in the quark-gluon plasma.

Submitted to arXiv on 26 Jul. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2407.18796v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , This paper presents a detailed analysis of the jet radius dependence of dijet momentum balance and suppression in Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV, utilizing data collected by the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The study focuses on measuring the momentum balance between leading back-to-back jets in high-energy collisions, comparing results from Pb+Pb collisions to those from $pp$ collisions. The data sets used for this analysis include 1.72 $nb^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb collision data collected in 2018 and 255 pb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collision data collected in 2017, both at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=$ 5.02 TeV. Jets are reconstructed using the anti-$k_t$ algorithm with varying jet radius parameters ($R=$ 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6), allowing for a comprehensive investigation into the impact of jet size on dijet momentum balance. The study constructs dijet momentum balance distributions for leading jets with transverse momenta ranging from 100 to 562 GeV for smaller jet radii ($R=$ 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4) and from 158 to 562 GeV for larger jet radii ($R=$ 0.5 and 0.6). By normalizing these distributions, direct comparisons can be made between dijet yields in Pb+Pb collisions and dijet cross sections in $pp$ collisions. The results reveal a clear suppression of more balanced dijets in Pb+Pb collisions compared to $pp$ collisions, alongside an enhancement for more imbalanced dijets. The observed jet radius dependence indicates that this suppression is more pronounced for imbalanced dijets than balanced ones. Furthermore, the study measures pair nuclear modification factors for jet pairs, finding that subleading jet yields are more suppressed than leading jet yields within dijets. A notable observation is the decreasing level of suppression with increasing jet radius, highlighting a distinct trend in the modification factors based on jet size. Overall, these findings provide valuable insights into jet quenching scenarios within the quark-gluon plasma environment present in high-energy nuclear collisions. The detailed analysis presented in this paper contributes significantly to our understanding of particle interactions under extreme conditions and offers new constraints for theoretical models describing these phenomena.
Created on 15 Oct. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.