Super-efficiency and Stock Market Valuation: Evidence from Listed Banks in China (2006 to 2023)

AI-generated keywords: Bank efficiency Stock market valuation China Data Envelopment Analysis Non-Performing Loans

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study by Yun Liao explores relationship between bank efficiency and stock market valuation in China
  • Utilizes unique Super-SBM-UND-VRS based DEA model focusing on NPLs as undesired output
  • Super-efficiency shows stronger correlation with stock market valuation than ROA (Tobin's Q)
  • Super-SBM-UND-VRS model offers new insights compared to SFA and traditional DEA models
  • Results suggest bank evaluations benefit from reduced ownership concentration, while interest rate liberalization has a negative impact
  • Analysis sheds light on dynamics between bank efficiency and stock market valuation in China over nearly two decades
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yun Liao

arXiv: 2407.14734v1 - DOI (q-fin.PR)
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: This study investigates the relationship between bank efficiency and stock market valuation using an unbalanced panel dataset of 42 listed banks in China from 2006 to 2023. We employ a non-radial and non-oriented slack based super-efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis (Super-SBM-UND-VRS based DEA) model, which treats Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) as an undesired output. Our results show that the relationship between super-efficiency and stock market valuation is stronger than that between Return on Asset (ROA) and stock market performance, as measured by Tobin's Q. Notably, the Super-SBM-UND-VRS model yields novel results compared to other efficiency methods, such as the Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) approach and traditional DEA models. Furthermore, our results suggest that bank evaluations benefit from decreased ownership concentration, whereas interest rate liberalization has the opposite effect.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Jul. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2407.14734v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This study by Yun Liao explores the relationship between bank efficiency and stock market valuation in China using an unbalanced panel dataset of 42 listed banks from 2006 to 2023. The research utilizes a unique non-radial and non-oriented slack based super-efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis (Super-SBM-UND-VRS based DEA) model, with a focus on treating Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) as an undesired output. The findings reveal that super-efficiency has a stronger correlation with stock market valuation than Return on Asset (ROA), as measured by Tobin's Q. Notably, the Super-SBM-UND-VRS model offers new insights compared to other efficiency methodologies like Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) and traditional DEA models. Furthermore, the results suggest that bank evaluations benefit from reduced ownership concentration while interest rate liberalization has a negative impact. This comprehensive analysis sheds light on the complex dynamics between bank efficiency and stock market valuation in China's banking sector over nearly two decades. By examining specific operational inefficiencies such as NPLs and considering broader economic factors like interest rate policies, this study provides valuable implications for stakeholders looking to improve bank performance and maximize stock market value in China's financial landscape.
Created on 18 Oct. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.