Automata-based constraints for language model decoding

AI-generated keywords: Language Modeling

AI-generated Key Points

  • Growing demand for language models that can generate strings in formal languages such as structured data, API calls, or code snippets
  • Challenge of ensuring complete conformance to formal syntax, especially for smaller language models intended for widespread deployment
  • Proposal to leverage automata theory to develop an efficient solution for regular languages and deterministic context-free languages
  • Approach focuses on pre-computing matches based on per-token decoding logits to reduce computational complexity and facilitate easy deployment at scale
  • Comparison with existing methods like Outlines and SynCode, highlighting the more generalized and user-friendly framework with support for wildcard matching enhancements
  • Efficiency in handling grammars compared to systems like Synchromesh or Guidance, without sacrificing speed for flexibility
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Terry Koo, Frederick Liu, Luheng He

Accepted to CoLM 2024
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: LMs are often expected to generate strings in some formal language; for example, structured data, API calls, or code snippets. Although LMs can be tuned to improve their adherence to formal syntax, this does not guarantee conformance, especially with smaller LMs suitable for large-scale deployment. In addition, tuning requires significant resources, making it impractical for uncommon or task-specific formats. To prevent downstream parsing errors we would ideally constrain the LM to only produce valid output, but this is severely complicated by tokenization, which is typically both ambiguous and misaligned with the formal grammar. We solve these issues through the application of automata theory, deriving an efficient closed-form solution for the regular languages, a broad class of formal languages with many practical applications, including API calls or schema-guided JSON and YAML. We also discuss pragmatic extensions for coping with the issue of high branching factor. Finally, we extend our techniques to deterministic context-free languages, which similarly admit an efficient closed-form solution. In spite of its flexibility and representative power, our approach only requires access to per-token decoding logits and lowers into simple calculations that are independent of LM size, making it both efficient and easy to apply to almost any LM architecture.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Jul. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2407.08103v1

, , , , In the field of language modeling, there is a growing demand for models that can generate strings in formal languages such as structured data, API calls, or code snippets. While language models (LMs) can be fine-tuned to improve their adherence to formal syntax, ensuring complete conformance remains a challenge. This is especially true for smaller LMs intended for widespread deployment. Tuning LMs requires substantial resources and may not be feasible for uncommon or task-specific formats. To address the issue of downstream parsing errors caused by invalid output from LMs, our ideal solution would restrict the LM to produce only valid strings. However, this task is complicated by tokenization, which often does not align perfectly with formal grammar rules. To tackle these challenges effectively, we propose leveraging automata theory to develop an efficient solution for regular languages—a class of formal languages with practical applications like API calls and schema-guided JSON and YAML. By applying automata-theoretic principles, we can ensure that the generated outputs adhere to the specified grammar rules while also addressing issues related to high branching factors. Furthermore, we extend our techniques to deterministic context-free languages, offering a closed-form solution that is both flexible and powerful. Our approach stands out for its simplicity and scalability across different LM architectures. Unlike some existing methods that rely on bespoke algorithms or dynamic vocabulary matching during decoding steps, our technique pre-computes matches statically based on per-token decoding logits. This streamlined process reduces computational complexity and facilitates easy deployment at scale. In comparison to related work such as Outlines and SynCode which also utilize finite-state automata (FSA) but with different strategies like manual indexing operations or lexer token unrolling, our approach offers a more generalized and user-friendly framework with support for wildcard matching enhancements. Additionally, our method demonstrates efficiency in handling grammars compared to systems like Synchromesh or Guidance which may sacrifice speed for flexibility. Looking ahead, our approach opens up various applications due to its clean design and efficiency. For instance, it can be applied effectively in generating JSON expressions with precise structure and content alignment. Overall, our innovative use of automata theory in language model decoding presents a promising avenue for enhancing string generation accuracy in diverse formal language contexts while maintaining computational efficiency at scale.
Created on 05 Sep. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.