Monitoring Latent World States in Language Models with Propositional Probes

AI-generated keywords: Language Models Interpretability Tools Propositional Probes Latent World States Biases and Unfaithful Responses

AI-generated Key Points

  • Researchers focus on monitoring latent world states in language models using propositional probes
  • Language models exhibit biases and unfaithful responses, prompting the need for interpretability tools
  • Hypothesis: Language models encode input contexts in a latent world model
  • Propositional probes compose tokens for lexical information and bind them into logical propositions representing the world state
  • Introduction of a Hessian-based algorithm to identify the binding subspace, inspired by previous work using Jacobians
  • Evaluation through quantitative causal interventions and qualitative analysis
  • Effectiveness of propositional probes demonstrated in a closed-world setting with finite predicates and properties
  • Probes successfully generalize to more complex scenarios such as short stories and translations into different languages like Spanish
  • Exploration of scenarios where language models respond unfaithfully to input contexts, including prompt injections, backdoor attacks, and gender bias
  • Decoded propositions remain faithful even when language models respond unfaithfully, suggesting accurate encoding but struggles with faithful decoding
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jiahai Feng, Stuart Russell, Jacob Steinhardt

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: Language models are susceptible to bias, sycophancy, backdoors, and other tendencies that lead to unfaithful responses to the input context. Interpreting internal states of language models could help monitor and correct unfaithful behavior. We hypothesize that language models represent their input contexts in a latent world model, and seek to extract this latent world state from the activations. We do so with 'propositional probes', which compositionally probe tokens for lexical information and bind them into logical propositions representing the world state. For example, given the input context ''Greg is a nurse. Laura is a physicist.'', we decode the propositions ''WorksAs(Greg, nurse)'' and ''WorksAs(Laura, physicist)'' from the model's activations. Key to this is identifying a 'binding subspace' in which bound tokens have high similarity (''Greg'' and ''nurse'') but unbound ones do not (''Greg'' and ''physicist''). We validate propositional probes in a closed-world setting with finitely many predicates and properties. Despite being trained on simple templated contexts, propositional probes generalize to contexts rewritten as short stories and translated to Spanish. Moreover, we find that in three settings where language models respond unfaithfully to the input context -- prompt injections, backdoor attacks, and gender bias -- the decoded propositions remain faithful. This suggests that language models often encode a faithful world model but decode it unfaithfully, which motivates the search for better interpretability tools for monitoring LMs.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 Jun. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2406.19501v1

In this study, the researchers focus on monitoring latent world states in language models using propositional probes. Language models are known to exhibit biases and unfaithful responses, prompting the need for interpretability tools to correct such behavior. The researchers hypothesize that language models encode input contexts in a latent world model and aim to extract this information through propositional probes. These probes compose tokens for lexical information and bind them into logical propositions representing the world state. To identify the binding subspace, a Hessian-based algorithm is introduced, inspired by previous work using Jacobians in unrelated tasks. This algorithm is evaluated through quantitative causal interventions and qualitative analysis. The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of propositional probes in a closed-world setting with finite predicates and properties. Despite being trained on simple templated contexts, these probes successfully generalize to more complex scenarios such as short stories and translations into different languages like Spanish. Furthermore, the study explores various scenarios where language models respond unfaithfully to input contexts, including prompt injections, backdoor attacks, and gender bias. Interestingly, even in these cases, the decoded propositions remain faithful, suggesting that language models often encode an accurate world model but may struggle with faithful decoding.
Created on 07 Jul. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.