Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2406.14701v1

, , , , This paper focuses on addressing constraints in applying Large Language Models (LLMs) to Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR). Recent studies have utilized prefixLM-type models that incorporate speech as a prefix to LLMs for ASR tasks. The optimization of speech prefixes has been identified as crucial for improving ASR performance. To address this, the authors propose using RNNT loss for speech prefix-tuning, which has shown promising results without increasing model complexity or altering the inference pipeline. Additionally, language-based soft prompting is introduced to further enhance ASR performance with frozen LLMs. Empirical analysis on a real-time test set of 10 Indic languages demonstrates that the proposed speech prefix-tuning approach leads to improvements in both frozen and fine-tuned LLMs. Specifically, implementing prefix-tuning with RNNT loss results in a 12% relative improvement in Word Error Rate (WER) compared to the baseline with a fine-tuned LLM. Utilizing these approaches with frozen LLMs yields a significant 31% relative improvement over basic soft-prompting prefixLM techniques. Insights into training and testing data statistics for various languages including Bengali, English, Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Tamil, Telugu, and Urdu are provided. The authors use universal speech models (USM) with different model complexities (300M and 600M parameters) for their speech encoder. These USM architectures leverage chunk-wise bi-directional attention and are trained using multilingual data from over 100 languages. Details about the large language model used in the study are also provided. The LLM builds upon JAX based M4 multipod models with different parameter sizes (128M and 500M). Both models are trained using vast amounts of text tokens and utilize relative positional embeddings and GELU activations for efficient training and inference. In conclusion, detailed experimentation and analysis presented in this paper demonstrate that incorporating speech prefix-tuning with RNNT loss can significantly enhance ASR performance when utilizing LLMs for various languages.

• - Recent studies have utilized prefixLM-type models that incorporate speech as a prefix to Large Language Models (LLMs) for Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) tasks.
• - Optimization of speech prefixes is crucial for improving ASR performance.
• - Proposal to use RNNT loss for speech prefix-tuning, showing promising results without increasing model complexity or altering the inference pipeline.
• - Introduction of language-based soft prompting to further enhance ASR performance with frozen LLMs.
• - Empirical analysis on 10 Indic languages shows that speech prefix-tuning with RNNT loss leads to improvements in both frozen and fine-tuned LLMs, resulting in a 12% relative improvement in Word Error Rate (WER) compared to baseline with a fine-tuned LLM.
• - Utilizing these approaches with frozen LLMs yields a significant 31% relative improvement over basic soft-prompting prefixLM techniques.

Summary- Scientists have been using special models that combine speech with large language models to help computers understand spoken words better. - Making sure the speech part of these models is optimized is really important for making the computer understand us even more accurately. - A new idea suggests using a certain kind of loss function to fine-tune the speech part of the model, which has shown good results without making things too complicated. - Another new technique involves using soft prompts based on language to make the computer understand spoken words even better when using frozen language models. - By testing these methods on different languages, researchers found that tuning the speech part with this loss function can significantly improve how well the computer understands us. Definitions- PrefixLM-type models: Special types of models that use speech as a starting point before processing larger language models. - Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR): Technology that helps computers recognize and understand spoken words. - RNNT loss: A specific type of mathematical calculation used to adjust and fine-tune parts of a model for better performance. - Large Language Models (LLMs): Complex systems that help computers process and understand human languages more effectively. - Word Error Rate (WER): A measure of how accurately a system transcribes spoken words compared to their actual pronunciation.

Title: Enhancing Automatic Speech Recognition with Large Language Models: A Detailed Analysis Introduction: Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) has seen significant advancements in recent years, thanks to the use of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, applying LLMs to ASR tasks comes with its own set of challenges and constraints. In this research paper, the authors address these constraints and propose novel approaches for improving ASR performance. Background: Recent studies have utilized prefixLM-type models that incorporate speech as a prefix to LLMs for ASR tasks. This approach has shown promising results but optimizing speech prefixes remains a crucial factor in achieving better performance. To overcome this challenge, the authors propose using RNNT loss for speech prefix-tuning. Methodology: The authors conduct experiments on a real-time test set of 10 Indic languages using universal speech models (USM) with different model complexities (300M and 600M parameters). These USM architectures leverage chunk-wise bi-directional attention and are trained using multilingual data from over 100 languages. The large language model used in the study is built upon JAX based M4 multipod models with different parameter sizes (128M and 500M). Results: The results of the experiments demonstrate that incorporating speech prefix-tuning with RNNT loss leads to improvements in both frozen and fine-tuned LLMs. Specifically, implementing prefix-tuning with RNNT loss results in a 12% relative improvement in Word Error Rate (WER) compared to the baseline with a fine-tuned LLM. Utilizing these approaches with frozen LLMs yields a significant 31% relative improvement over basic soft-prompting prefixLM techniques. Analysis: The authors provide insights into training and testing data statistics for various languages including Bengali, English, Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Tamil, Telugu, and Urdu. They also discuss the benefits of using universal speech models and large language models with different parameter sizes for ASR tasks. Conclusion: In conclusion, this research paper highlights the importance of addressing constraints in applying LLMs to ASR tasks. The proposed approaches of speech prefix-tuning with RNNT loss and language-based soft prompting have shown significant improvements in ASR performance without increasing model complexity or altering the inference pipeline. These findings can be beneficial for future research and development in the field of automatic speech recognition. References: The authors provide a list of references used in their study, including previous studies on LLMs and ASR, as well as relevant literature on universal speech models and large language models. Overall, this research paper provides a detailed analysis of incorporating LLMs into ASR tasks. The experiments conducted on various languages demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approaches for improving ASR performance. The inclusion of insights into training and testing data statistics adds further value to this study. This paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers and developers working on enhancing automatic speech recognition using large language models.