A Systematic Survey of Text Summarization: From Statistical Methods to Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Text Summarization Statistical Methods Large Language Models Deep Neural Networks Pre-trained Language Models

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors: Haopeng Zhang, Philip S. Yu, Jiawei Zhang
  • Evolution of text summarization research:
  • Advancements in deep neural networks
  • Pre-trained language models (PLMs)
  • Recent large language models (LLMs)
  • Two main parts of the paper:
  • Overview of datasets, evaluation metrics, and summarization methods pre-dating LLM era
  • Traditional statistical methods
  • Deep learning approaches
  • PLM fine-tuning techniques
  • Recent advancements in benchmarking, modeling, and evaluating summarization within LLM era
  • Purpose of the survey:
  • Synthesizing existing literature and offering a cohesive overview
  • Highlighting research trends and addressing open challenges
  • Proposing promising research directions in text summarization field
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Haopeng Zhang, Philip S. Yu, Jiawei Zhang

30 pages, 8 figures, 6 tables

Abstract: Text summarization research has undergone several significant transformations with the advent of deep neural networks, pre-trained language models (PLMs), and recent large language models (LLMs). This survey thus provides a comprehensive review of the research progress and evolution in text summarization through the lens of these paradigm shifts. It is organized into two main parts: (1) a detailed overview of datasets, evaluation metrics, and summarization methods before the LLM era, encompassing traditional statistical methods, deep learning approaches, and PLM fine-tuning techniques, and (2) the first detailed examination of recent advancements in benchmarking, modeling, and evaluating summarization in the LLM era. By synthesizing existing literature and presenting a cohesive overview, this survey also discusses research trends, open challenges, and proposes promising research directions in summarization, aiming to guide researchers through the evolving landscape of summarization research.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Jun. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2406.11289v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "A Systematic Survey of Text Summarization: From Statistical Methods to Large Language Models," authors Haopeng Zhang, Philip S. Yu, and Jiawei Zhang delve into the evolution of text summarization research in light of advancements in deep neural networks, pre-trained language models (PLMs), and recent large language models (LLMs). The survey offers a comprehensive examination of the progress made in text summarization through the lens of these paradigm shifts. Divided into two main parts, the paper first provides a detailed overview of datasets, evaluation metrics, and summarization methods predating the LLM era. This includes discussions on traditional statistical methods, deep learning approaches, and PLM fine-tuning techniques. The second part focuses on recent advancements in benchmarking, modeling, and evaluating summarization within the LLM era. By synthesizing existing literature and offering a cohesive overview, the survey not only highlights research trends but also addresses open challenges while proposing promising research directions in the field of summarization. Ultimately, this work aims to guide researchers through the dynamic landscape of text summarization research by providing insights into its evolution and future prospects.
Created on 15 Oct. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.