A Survey on LLM-Based Agentic Workflows and LLM-Profiled Components

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Agentic Workflows LMPCs Generative Large Language Models AI Agents

AI-generated Key Points

  • Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the development of sophisticated agentic workflows.
  • LLMs have surpassed traditional single-path prompting techniques such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT).
  • The survey focuses on LLM-Profiled Components (LMPCs) within agentic workflows, excluding non-LLM components.
  • Generative Large Language Models (GLMs or LLMs) excel in acquiring extensive general knowledge and human-like reasoning capabilities.
  • LLM-based agents interact with external tools and environments, playing integral roles in agency through actions, planning, and evaluation.
  • The survey aims to clarify the roles of LLMs in agent implementations by creating common workflows that incorporate reusable LMPCs.
  • By exploring LLM-based agentic workflows and LMPCs, researchers can effectively leverage these advanced language models for developing intelligent AI agents.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Xinzhe Li

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have catalyzed the development of sophisticated agentic workflows, offering improvements over traditional single-path, Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting techniques. This survey summarize the common workflows, with the particular focus on LLM-Profiled Components (LMPCs) and ignorance of non-LLM components. The reason behind such exploration is to facilitate a clearer understanding of LLM roles and see how reusabile of the LMPCs.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Jun. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2406.05804v1

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the development of sophisticated agentic workflows. These models have surpassed traditional single-path prompting techniques such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT). This survey delves into the intricacies of these workflows, with a specific emphasis on LLM-Profiled Components (LMPCs), while disregarding non-LLM components. The primary objective is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the roles played by LLMs and assess the reusability of LMPCs. Generative Large Language Models (GLMs or LLMs) have shown remarkable proficiency in acquiring extensive general knowledge and human-like reasoning capabilities. This makes them indispensable in constructing AI agents known as LLM-based agents. These agents actively interact with external tools and environments, functioning as integral components of agency through actions, planning, and evaluation. The motivation for this survey stems from the observation that many LLM-based agents incorporate similar workflows and components despite facing various technical and conceptual challenges such as search algorithms, tree structures, and Reinforcement Learning (RL) components. While existing approaches offer modular solutions or comprehensive reviews of LLM agents' capabilities across profiling, memory, planning, and action; this survey takes a different approach by focusing on the involvement of LLMs within agentic workflows. Instead of aiming to cover all components comprehensively, this survey concentrates on clarifying the roles of LLMs in agent implementations by creating common workflows that incorporate reusable LMPCs. By doing so, it provides a clearer understanding of how LLMs contribute to agentic workflows and highlights their significance in enhancing overall performance. Through this refined exploration of LLM-based agentic workflows and LMPCs, researchers can gain valuable insights into leveraging these advanced language models effectively for developing intelligent AI agents.
Created on 02 Jul. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: -1

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.