Information Benchmark for Biological Sensors Beyond Steady States -- Mpemba-like sensory withdrawal effect

AI-generated keywords: Biological sensors temporal dynamics sensory performance Kullback-Leibler divergence metric Markovian dynamics

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors: Asawari Pagare and Zhiyue Lu
  • Focus: Dynamics of biological sensors in response to ligand concentrations
  • Importance of temporal dynamics in signaling processes
  • Sensor performance dependent on differentiating sensory state transitions under various conditions
  • Introduction of theoretical framework using KL divergence metric for characterizing transient sensory dynamics
  • Counterintuitive phenomenon in multi-state sensors: initial exposure to high ligand concentrations may dampen sensitivity but lead to enhanced performance after reset in low-concentration environment
  • Machine learning analysis on 4-state sensors reveals correlation between sensor performance and Markovian graph structure representing sensor states
  • Significance of understanding and leveraging Markovian dynamics for optimizing biological sensor functionality
  • Research contributes insights into enhancing sensor performance beyond steady-state considerations, with implications for biophysics and bioinformatics.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Asawari Pagare, Zhiyue Lu

arXiv: 2406.04304v1 - DOI (cond-mat.stat-mech)

Abstract: Biological sensors rely on the temporal dynamics of ligand concentration for signaling. The sensory performance is bounded by the distinguishability between the sensory state transition dynamics under different environmental protocols. This work presents a comprehensive theory to characterize arbitrary transient sensory dynamics of biological sensors. Here the sensory performance is quantified by the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the probability distributions of the sensor's stochastic paths. We introduce a novel benchmark to assess a sensor's transient sensory performance arbitrarily far from equilibrium. We identify a counter-intuitive phenomenon in multi-state sensors: while an initial exposure to high ligand concentration may hinder a sensor's sensitivity towards a future concentration up-shift, certain sensors may show a boost in sensitivity if the initial high concentration exposure is followed by a transient resetting at a low concentration environment. The boosted performance exceeds that of a sensor starting from an initially low concentration environment. This effect, reminiscent of a drug withdrawal effect, can be explained by the Markovian dynamics of the multi-state sensor, similar to the Markovian Mpemba effect. Moreover, an exhaustive machine learning study of 4-state sensors reveals a tight connection between the sensor's performance and the structure of the Markovian graph of its states.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Jun. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2406.04304v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study titled "Information Benchmark for Biological Sensors Beyond Steady States -- Mpemba-like sensory withdrawal effect," authors Asawari Pagare and Zhiyue Lu delve into the intricate dynamics of biological sensors in response to varying ligand concentrations. They highlight the crucial role of temporal dynamics in signaling processes and emphasize that sensor performance is contingent upon differentiating between sensory state transitions under various environmental conditions. The researchers introduce a novel theoretical framework for characterizing transient sensory dynamics using the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence metric, allowing for a comprehensive assessment of sensor behavior in non-equilibrium scenarios. One key finding presented in the study is a counterintuitive phenomenon observed in multi-state sensors where an initial exposure to high ligand concentrations may dampen sensitivity but can lead to enhanced performance if followed by a reset in a low-concentration environment. This unexpected boost surpasses that of sensors starting from low-concentration environments and draws parallels to a drug withdrawal effect. Additionally, through machine learning analysis on 4-state sensors, Pagare and Lu establish a strong correlation between sensor performance and the underlying Markovian graph structure representing sensor states. This insight highlights the importance of understanding and leveraging Markovian dynamics in optimizing biological sensor functionality. Overall, this research sheds light on complex mechanisms governing biological sensor responses and offers valuable insights into enhancing sensor performance beyond traditional steady-state considerations. The findings pave the way for further exploration and refinement of biological sensing technologies with potential implications for fields such as biophysics and bioinformatics.
Created on 26 Jun. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.