Transformers need glasses! Information over-squashing in language tasks

AI-generated keywords: Neural Information Processing Systems

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study presented at NeurIPS 2024 delves into information propagation in decoder-only Transformers
  • Uncovering representational collapse and over-squashing phenomena in decoder-only Transformers
  • Certain input sequences lead to similar representations hindering model differentiation
  • Decoder-only Transformers may lose sensitivity to specific tokens within input sequences
  • Emphasizes enhancing base model's capabilities for complex reasoning tasks
  • Focus on understanding practical implications of the last token's representation
  • Unidirectional causal mask in decoder-only Transformers contributes to representational collapse
  • Parallels drawn with vanishing gradients in graph neural networks
  • Significant contributions made by shedding light on these phenomena through theoretical analysis and empirical validation
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Federico Barbero, Andrea Banino, Steven Kapturowski, Dharshan Kumaran, João G. M. Araújo, Alex Vitvitskyi, Razvan Pascanu, Petar Veličković

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We study how information propagates in decoder-only Transformers, which are the architectural backbone of most existing frontier large language models (LLMs). We rely on a theoretical signal propagation analysis -- specifically, we analyse the representations of the last token in the final layer of the Transformer, as this is the representation used for next-token prediction. Our analysis reveals a representational collapse phenomenon: we prove that certain distinct sequences of inputs to the Transformer can yield arbitrarily close representations in the final token. This effect is exacerbated by the low-precision floating-point formats frequently used in modern LLMs. As a result, the model is provably unable to respond to these sequences in different ways -- leading to errors in, e.g., tasks involving counting or copying. Further, we show that decoder-only Transformer language models can lose sensitivity to specific tokens in the input, which relates to the well-known phenomenon of over-squashing in graph neural networks. We provide empirical evidence supporting our claims on contemporary LLMs. Our theory also points to simple solutions towards ameliorating these issues.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Jun. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2406.04267v2

In this study presented at the 38th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2024), the researchers delve into the intricacies of information propagation in decoder-only Transformers, which serve as the foundational architecture for many cutting-edge large language models (LLMs). Through a rigorous theoretical analysis focused on signal propagation, specifically examining the representations of the final token in the last layer of the Transformer, crucial for next-token prediction, a phenomenon known as representational collapse is uncovered. The study highlights <kw>representational collapse and over-squashing phenomena</kw> in <kw>decoder-only Transformers</kw>, offering practical solutions derived from their theoretical findings. The researchers demonstrate that certain sequences of inputs can result in remarkably similar representations in the final token, ultimately hindering the model's ability to differentiate between these sequences and leading to errors in tasks such as counting or copying. Moreover, it is revealed that decoder-only Transformer language models may lose sensitivity to specific tokens within input sequences, reminiscent of over-squashing observed in graph neural networks. By providing empirical evidence from contemporary LLMs, <kw>this study underscores practical implications and proposes straightforward solutions for future advancements.</kw> The research team emphasizes that while tools can aid LLMs in tackling tasks like counting and copying, enhancing the base model's inherent capabilities is crucial due to complex reasoning operations often required even before utilizing such tools. By elucidating why decoder-only Transformers struggle with these fundamental tasks, not only is intellectual curiosity satisfied but also practical guidance for further advancements is offered. Unlike previous works making assumptions incongruent with real-world constraints, this study focuses on understanding <kw>the information encoded in the last token's representation at a practical level.</kw> Furthermore, it is highlighted that the unidirectional causal mask employed by decoder-only Transformers contributes to representational collapse by funneling information towards a single point—the final token—potentially resulting in information loss through over-squashing. Drawing parallels with vanishing gradients observed in graph neural networks, <kw>this finding may be of interest to GNN researchers seeking practical applications at scale.</kw> In conclusion, this paper makes significant contributions by shedding light on representational collapse and over-squashing phenomena in decoder-only Transformers through a blend of theoretical analysis and empirical validation.
Created on 12 Dec. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.