Position: Rethinking Post-Hoc Search-Based Neural Approaches for Solving Large-Scale Traveling Salesman Problems

AI-generated keywords: Traveling Salesman Problem Post-Hoc Search-Based Neural Approaches Heatmap-Guided Monte Carlo Tree Search Machine Learning Combinatorial Problems

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors explore advancements in solving large-scale TSP using heatmap-guided MCTS paradigm
  • ML models used to generate heatmaps guiding MCTS in finding solutions
  • Doubts raised about effectiveness of ML-based heatmap generation
  • Suggestion to focus on developing more theoretically sound methods
  • Questioning practical value of heatmap-guided MCTS paradigm compared to other heuristic approaches
  • Work challenges existing paradigms and offers insights into optimizing solution-finding processes for TSPs
  • Paper accepted by ICML 2024, highlighting significance in advancing research in the field
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yifan Xia, Xianliang Yang, Zichuan Liu, Zhihao Liu, Lei Song, Jiang Bian

Accepted by International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2024)

Abstract: Recent advancements in solving large-scale traveling salesman problems (TSP) utilize the heatmap-guided Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) paradigm, where machine learning (ML) models generate heatmaps, indicating the probability distribution of each edge being part of the optimal solution, to guide MCTS in solution finding. However, our theoretical and experimental analysis raises doubts about the effectiveness of ML-based heatmap generation. In support of this, we demonstrate that a simple baseline method can outperform complex ML approaches in heatmap generation. Furthermore, we question the practical value of the heatmap-guided MCTS paradigm. To substantiate this, our findings show its inferiority to the LKH-3 heuristic despite the paradigm's reliance on problem-specific, hand-crafted strategies. For the future, we suggest research directions focused on developing more theoretically sound heatmap generation methods and exploring autonomous, generalizable ML approaches for combinatorial problems. The code is available for review: https://github.com/xyfffff/rethink_mcts_for_tsp.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Jun. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2406.03503v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Rethinking Post-Hoc Search-Based Neural Approaches for Solving Large-Scale Traveling Salesman Problems," authors Yifan Xia, Xianliang Yang, Zichuan Liu, Zhihao Liu, Lei Song, and Jiang Bian explore advancements in solving large-scale traveling salesman problems (TSP) using the heatmap-guided Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) paradigm. This approach utilizes machine learning (ML) models to generate heatmaps that guide MCTS in finding solutions. However, their analysis raises doubts about the effectiveness of ML-based heatmap generation and suggests focusing on developing more theoretically sound methods. They also question the practical value of the heatmap-guided MCTS paradigm compared to other heuristic approaches. Their work challenges existing paradigms and offers valuable insights into optimizing solution-finding processes for TSPs. The paper has been accepted by the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2024), highlighting its significance in advancing research in this field. For those interested in further exploration or replication of their findings, the authors have made their code available for review on GitHub at https://github.com/xyfffff/rethink_mcts_for_tsp.
Created on 27 Feb. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.