Exploring the Potential of Hybrid Machine-Learning/Physics-Based Modeling for Atmospheric/Oceanic Prediction Beyond the Medium Range

AI-generated keywords: Hybrid modeling Machine learning Weather prediction Low-resolution atmospheric general circulation model Meteorological phenomena

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors explore hybrid modeling approach combining machine learning (ML) with traditional physics-based modeling for long-term weather prediction
  • Hybrid model based on low-resolution atmospheric general circulation model SPEEDY incorporating parameterization and three ML-based prognostic variables
  • Model demonstrates significant skill in predicting phenomena such as El Niño cycle and global teleconnections over periods ranging from 3 to 7 months
  • Accurately captures equatorial variability in precipitation linked to Kelvin and Rossby waves, Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO)
  • Predictions of precipitation in equatorial region exhibit skill up to 15 days in East Pacific and 11.5 days in West Pacific
  • Hybrid approach showcases comparable prediction accuracy to high-resolution purely physics-based operational forecast models for specific tasks
  • Integration of machine learning techniques with conventional physics-based modeling can advance weather prediction capabilities beyond traditional medium-range forecasts
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Dhruvit Patel, Troy Arcomano, Brian Hunt, Istvan Szunyogh, Edward Ott

arXiv: 2405.19518v1 - DOI (physics.ao-ph)

Abstract: This paper explores the potential of a hybrid modeling approach that combines machine learning (ML) with conventional physics-based modeling for weather prediction beyond the medium range. It extends the work of Arcomano et al. (2022), which tested the approach for short- and medium-range weather prediction, and the work of Arcomano et al. (2023), which investigated its potential for climate modeling. The hybrid model used for the forecast experiments of the paper is based on the low-resolution, simplified parameterization atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) SPEEDY. In addition to the hybridized prognostic variables of SPEEDY, the current version of the model has three purely ML-based prognostic variables. One of these is 6~h cumulative precipitation, another is the sea surface temperature, while the third is the heat content of the top 300 m deep layer of the ocean. The model has skill in predicting the El Ni\~no cycle and its global teleconnections with precipitation for 3-7 months depending on the season. The model captures equatorial variability of the precipitation associated with Kelvin and Rossby waves and MJO. Predictions of the precipitation in the equatorial region have skill for 15 days in the East Pacific and 11.5 days in the West Pacific. Though the model has low spatial resolution, for these tasks it has prediction skill comparable to what has been published for high-resolution, purely physics-based, conventional operational forecast models.

Submitted to arXiv on 29 May. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2405.19518v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In this paper, authors Dhruvit Patel, Troy Arcomano, Brian Hunt, Istvan Szunyogh, and Edward Ott explore the potential of a hybrid modeling approach that combines machine learning (ML) with traditional physics-based modeling for long-term weather prediction. The study builds upon previous research by Arcomano et al. in 2022 and 2023 on short- and medium-range weather prediction and climate modeling respectively. It introduces a hybrid model based on the low-resolution atmospheric general circulation model SPEEDY which incorporates both its parameterization and three ML-based prognostic variables: 6-hour cumulative precipitation, sea surface temperature, and heat content of the top 300 meters of the ocean. Despite its low spatial resolution, the model demonstrates significant skill in predicting phenomena such as the El Niño cycle and its global teleconnections over periods ranging from 3 to 7 months depending on the season. Additionally, it accurately captures equatorial variability in precipitation linked to Kelvin and Rossby waves as well as the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO). Specifically, predictions of precipitation in the equatorial region exhibit skill up to 15 days in the East Pacific and 11.5 days in the West Pacific. Remarkably, despite its simplified nature compared to high-resolution purely physics-based operational forecast models, this hybrid approach showcases comparable prediction accuracy for these specific tasks. Overall,this study highlights how integrating machine learning techniques with conventional physics-based modeling can advance weather prediction capabilities beyond traditional medium-range forecasts. The findings underscore how such hybrid models can effectively capture complex atmospheric and oceanic dynamics to enhance our understanding and forecasting of key meteorological phenomena.
Created on 10 Mar. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.