In their paper titled "You Can't Solve These Super Mario Bros. Levels: Undecidable Mario Games," the MIT Hardness Group and authors Hayashi Ani, Erik D. Demaine, Holden Hall, Ricardo Ruiz, and Naveen Venkat explore the concept of RE-completeness and undecidability in 2D games within the Super Mario Bros. platform video game series. The study focuses on the New Super Mario Bros. series (including original, Wii, U, and 2 versions) as well as both installments of the Super Mario Maker games across all five game styles. Their research delves into proving that these games remain undecidable even with constant-size levels and screens. They generalize gameplay to allow for arbitrarily many enemies at each location and onscreen while also accommodating exponentially large or nonexistent timers. Remarkably, their constructions for New Super Mario Bros. fit within a standard screen size. To achieve these results in the realm of Mario games, they develop a novel theory of counter gadgets within a motion-planning-through-gadgets framework. Additionally, they provide a collection of simple gadgets where reachability is proven to be RE-complete. The paper highlights two main sections: The first section focuses on the New Super Mario Bros. series where a single reduction covers multiple games by utilizing the unique "event" game mechanic that toggles block existence based on Mario's location. They successfully construct a universal counter machine within one screen of the Wii version, showcasing that even solving a single-screen level is RE-complete. In the second section dedicated to the Super Mario Maker series across various game styles and versions (including both installments of Super Mario Maker 1 and 2 in different styles such as Super Mario Bros., Super Mario World, and more), the authors use their meticulous analysis and innovative approach to counter gadgets theory to shed light on the complexities and undecidability present in these beloved video game franchises.
- - The study explores RE-completeness and undecidability in 2D games within the Super Mario Bros. platform video game series.
- - The research proves that New Super Mario Bros. and Super Mario Maker games remain undecidable even with constant-size levels and screens.
- - They develop a novel theory of counter gadgets within a motion-planning-through-gadgets framework to achieve these results in Mario games.
- - The paper highlights two main sections: one focusing on the New Super Mario Bros. series and another dedicated to the Super Mario Maker series across various game styles and versions.
- - In the New Super Mario Bros. section, they construct a universal counter machine within one screen of the Wii version, showcasing that solving even a single-screen level is RE-complete.
- - In the Super Mario Maker section, they use their innovative approach to shed light on complexities and undecidability present in these beloved video game franchises.
SummaryThe study looks at how hard it is to solve puzzles in Super Mario games. They found that some games are so tricky that they can't be solved no matter what you do. To prove this, they came up with new ideas called counter gadgets to help understand these difficult puzzles better. The research is split into two parts, one for New Super Mario Bros. and another for Super Mario Maker, showing how tough the levels can be even with small screens. By creating a special machine in one game and using a new method in the other, they show just how challenging these games can be.
Definitions- Undecidability: A concept that means something cannot be proven true or false.
- RE-completeness: A term indicating a high level of difficulty or complexity in solving a problem.
- Novel theory: A new idea or way of thinking that hasn't been used before.
- Counter gadgets: Special tools or methods designed to help understand and solve complex problems.
- Motion-planning-through-gadgets framework: A system of using tools or devices to figure out how things move and interact in a given environment.
Introduction
The Super Mario Bros. franchise is one of the most iconic and beloved video game series of all time, with millions of players worldwide enjoying its challenging levels and lovable characters. However, a recent research paper by the MIT Hardness Group and authors Hayashi Ani, Erik D. Demaine, Holden Hall, Ricardo Ruiz, and Naveen Venkat has shed light on a surprising aspect of these games - their undecidability.
In their paper titled "You Can't Solve These Super Mario Bros. Levels: Undecidable Mario Games," the researchers explore the concept of RE-completeness and undecidability in 2D games within the Super Mario Bros. platform video game series. This groundbreaking study delves into proving that certain levels in these games are impossible to solve even with constant-size levels and screens.
The Concept of RE-Completeness
Before diving into the specifics of the research paper, it is important to understand what exactly is meant by RE-completeness and undecidability in this context.
RE-completeness refers to a problem or task that can be solved using an algorithm but cannot be solved efficiently (in polynomial time). In other words, it may take an exponentially long amount of time to find a solution for such problems.
Undecidability takes this concept further by stating that there exists no algorithm or procedure that can determine whether a given problem has a solution or not. This means that even if we have infinite time at our disposal, we still cannot guarantee finding a solution for such problems.
Now let's see how these concepts apply to our favorite plumber's adventures in Mushroom Kingdom.
The New Super Mario Bros. Series
The first section of the research paper focuses on the New Super Mario Bros. series (including original, Wii, U, and 2 versions) and how the concept of RE-completeness applies to these games. The researchers utilize the unique "event" game mechanic in these games, where blocks can appear or disappear based on Mario's location.
Using this mechanic, they successfully construct a universal counter machine within one screen of the Wii version. This means that even solving a single-screen level in New Super Mario Bros. is RE-complete - it may take an exponentially long amount of time to find a solution for such levels.
What makes this even more remarkable is that their constructions fit within a standard screen size, making it applicable to all versions of New Super Mario Bros.
The Super Mario Maker Series
In the second section dedicated to the Super Mario Maker series, the authors expand their analysis to various game styles and versions (including both installments of Super Mario Maker 1 and 2 in different styles such as Super Mario Bros., Super Mario World, and more).
Using their meticulous analysis and innovative approach to counter gadgets theory, they showcase the complexities and undecidability present in these beloved video game franchises. Their research proves that even with exponentially large or nonexistent timers and arbitrarily many enemies onscreen, certain levels in these games remain undecidable.
Counter Gadgets Theory
To achieve these results in the realm of Mario games, the researchers develop a novel theory of counter gadgets within a motion-planning-through-gadgets framework. This theory allows them to analyze complex scenarios involving multiple enemies and obstacles onscreen simultaneously.
They also provide a collection of simple gadgets where reachability is proven to be RE-complete. These gadgets serve as building blocks for constructing larger scenarios with varying degrees of complexity.
Conclusion
The research paper by MIT Hardness Group and authors Hayashi Ani, Erik D. Demaine, Holden Hall, Ricardo Ruiz, and Naveen Venkat sheds light on an intriguing aspect of the Super Mario Bros. franchise - its undecidability. Through their meticulous analysis and innovative approach to counter gadgets theory, they prove that certain levels in these games are impossible to solve even with constant-size levels and screens.
Their findings not only add a new dimension to our understanding of these beloved video game franchises but also contribute to the field of computational complexity and undecidability. As technology continues to advance, it will be interesting to see how this research impacts the development of future video games and their level design.
In conclusion, "You Can't Solve These Super Mario Bros. Levels: Undecidable Mario Games" is a thought-provoking study that highlights the complexities and challenges present in seemingly simple 2D platformer games like Super Mario Bros. It serves as a reminder that even in the world of gaming, there are still mysteries waiting to be uncovered and solved.