Prompt Leakage effect and defense strategies for multi-turn LLM interactions

AI-generated keywords: Prompt leakage

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Prompt leakage in large language models (LLMs) is a significant security and privacy concern, potentially compromising sensitive intellectual property and aiding malicious attackers.
  • There is a lack of systematic evaluation of prompt leakage threats and effective mitigation strategies in multi-turn interactions using LLMs.
  • The study titled "Prompt Leakage effect and defense strategies for multi-turn LLM interactions" by Divyansh Agarwal et al. explores vulnerabilities associated with prompt leakage across 10 closed- and open-source LLMs in four different domains.
  • A novel threat model leveraging the sycophancy effect within LLMs significantly increases the average attack success rate (ASR) from 17.7% to 86.2% in multi-turn scenarios.
  • The researchers dissect specific prompt contents like task instructions and knowledge documents to understand the extent of leakage, evaluate seven black-box defense strategies, and fine-tune an open-source model to enhance resilience against prompt leakage attempts.
  • Various combinations of defenses against their threat model are presented along with a cost analysis to guide the development of secure LLM applications.
  • The research provides valuable insights for enhancing security in multi-turn LLM interactions, offering directions for future studies in this field.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Divyansh Agarwal, Alexander R. Fabbri, Ben Risher, Philippe Laban, Shafiq Joty, Chien-Sheng Wu

Abstract: Prompt leakage poses a compelling security and privacy threat in LLM applications. Leakage of system prompts may compromise intellectual property, and act as adversarial reconnaissance for an attacker. A systematic evaluation of prompt leakage threats and mitigation strategies is lacking, especially for multi-turn LLM interactions. In this paper, we systematically investigate LLM vulnerabilities against prompt leakage for 10 closed- and open-source LLMs, across four domains. We design a unique threat model which leverages the LLM sycophancy effect and elevates the average attack success rate (ASR) from 17.7% to 86.2% in a multi-turn setting. Our standardized setup further allows dissecting leakage of specific prompt contents such as task instructions and knowledge documents. We measure the mitigation effect of 7 black-box defense strategies, along with finetuning an open-source model to defend against leakage attempts. We present different combination of defenses against our threat model, including a cost analysis. Our study highlights key takeaways for building secure LLM applications and provides directions for research in multi-turn LLM interactions

Submitted to arXiv on 24 Apr. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2404.16251v3

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , Prompt leakage in large language models (LLMs) presents a significant security and privacy concern, as it can potentially compromise sensitive intellectual property and serve as reconnaissance for malicious attackers. Despite the growing use of LLMs in various applications, there is a lack of systematic evaluation of prompt leakage threats and effective mitigation strategies, particularly in multi-turn interactions. In their study titled "Prompt Leakage effect and defense strategies for multi-turn LLM interactions," authors Divyansh Agarwal, Alexander R. Fabbri, Ben Risher, Philippe Laban, Shafiq Joty, and Chien-Sheng Wu delve into the vulnerabilities associated with prompt leakage across 10 closed- and open-source LLMs spanning four different domains. They introduce a novel threat model that capitalizes on the sycophancy effect within LLMs to significantly increase the average attack success rate (ASR) from 17.7% to 86.2% in multi-turn scenarios. Through a meticulously designed experimental setup, the researchers are able to dissect specific prompt contents such as task instructions and knowledge documents to better understand the extent of leakage. They evaluate the effectiveness of seven black-box defense strategies and explore the process of fine-tuning an open-source model to enhance its resilience against prompt leakage attempts. Furthermore, the study presents various combinations of defenses against their threat model along with a cost analysis to provide insights into building secure LLM applications. By shedding light on key takeaways for enhancing security in multi-turn LLM interactions, this research contributes valuable directions for future studies in this domain.
Created on 07 Oct. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.