Prompt Leakage effect and defense strategies for multi-turn LLM interactions
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Prompt leakage in large language models (LLMs) is a significant security and privacy concern, potentially compromising sensitive intellectual property and aiding malicious attackers.
- There is a lack of systematic evaluation of prompt leakage threats and effective mitigation strategies in multi-turn interactions using LLMs.
- The study titled "Prompt Leakage effect and defense strategies for multi-turn LLM interactions" by Divyansh Agarwal et al. explores vulnerabilities associated with prompt leakage across 10 closed- and open-source LLMs in four different domains.
- A novel threat model leveraging the sycophancy effect within LLMs significantly increases the average attack success rate (ASR) from 17.7% to 86.2% in multi-turn scenarios.
- The researchers dissect specific prompt contents like task instructions and knowledge documents to understand the extent of leakage, evaluate seven black-box defense strategies, and fine-tune an open-source model to enhance resilience against prompt leakage attempts.
- Various combinations of defenses against their threat model are presented along with a cost analysis to guide the development of secure LLM applications.
- The research provides valuable insights for enhancing security in multi-turn LLM interactions, offering directions for future studies in this field.
Authors: Divyansh Agarwal, Alexander R. Fabbri, Ben Risher, Philippe Laban, Shafiq Joty, Chien-Sheng Wu
Abstract: Prompt leakage poses a compelling security and privacy threat in LLM applications. Leakage of system prompts may compromise intellectual property, and act as adversarial reconnaissance for an attacker. A systematic evaluation of prompt leakage threats and mitigation strategies is lacking, especially for multi-turn LLM interactions. In this paper, we systematically investigate LLM vulnerabilities against prompt leakage for 10 closed- and open-source LLMs, across four domains. We design a unique threat model which leverages the LLM sycophancy effect and elevates the average attack success rate (ASR) from 17.7% to 86.2% in a multi-turn setting. Our standardized setup further allows dissecting leakage of specific prompt contents such as task instructions and knowledge documents. We measure the mitigation effect of 7 black-box defense strategies, along with finetuning an open-source model to defend against leakage attempts. We present different combination of defenses against our threat model, including a cost analysis. Our study highlights key takeaways for building secure LLM applications and provides directions for research in multi-turn LLM interactions
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.