Accounting for AI and Users Shaping One Another: The Role of Mathematical Models

AI-generated keywords: AI systems user preferences mathematical models societal impacts formal interaction models

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Sarah Dean, Evan Dong, Meena Jagadeesan, and Liu Leqi explore the relationship between AI systems and users in societal domains
  • AI systems influence and are influenced by user preferences, opinions, and behaviors
  • Advocacy for the development of formal interaction models to mathematically define how AI and users shape each other
  • Formal interaction models serve purposes such as specifying interactions for implementation, monitoring through empirical analysis, anticipating societal impacts through counterfactual analysis, and controlling impacts via interventions
  • Consideration of factors like style, granularity, mathematical complexity, and measurability in designing formal interaction models
  • Importance of incorporating formal interaction models in the design or auditing of any AI system that interacts with users
  • Critical assessment of emerging literature on formal interaction models using content recommender systems as a case study
  • Call for a nuanced understanding of how AI systems and users co-evolve in shaping each other's behaviors within societal contexts
  • Leveraging formal interaction models can help navigate complex dynamics in human-AI interactions to create more ethical and effective AI technologies
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sarah Dean, Evan Dong, Meena Jagadeesan, Liu Leqi

Abstract: As AI systems enter into a growing number of societal domains, these systems increasingly shape and are shaped by user preferences, opinions, and behaviors. However, the design of AI systems rarely accounts for how AI and users shape one another. In this position paper, we argue for the development of formal interaction models which mathematically specify how AI and users shape one another. Formal interaction models can be leveraged to (1) specify interactions for implementation, (2) monitor interactions through empirical analysis, (3) anticipate societal impacts via counterfactual analysis, and (4) control societal impacts via interventions. The design space of formal interaction models is vast, and model design requires careful consideration of factors such as style, granularity, mathematical complexity, and measurability. Using content recommender systems as a case study, we critically examine the nascent literature of formal interaction models with respect to these use-cases and design axes. More broadly, we call for the community to leverage formal interaction models when designing, evaluating, or auditing any AI system which interacts with users.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Apr. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2404.12366v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Accounting for AI and Users Shaping One Another: The Role of Mathematical Models," authors Sarah Dean, Evan Dong, Meena Jagadeesan, and Liu Leqi explore the intricate relationship between AI systems and users in societal domains. They highlight how these systems not only influence but are also influenced by user preferences, opinions, and behaviors. Despite this mutual shaping process, the design of AI systems often overlooks this dynamic interaction. The authors advocate for the development of formal interaction models that can mathematically define how AI and users shape each other. These models serve multiple purposes such as specifying interactions for implementation, monitoring interactions through empirical analysis, anticipating societal impacts through counterfactual analysis, and controlling societal impacts via interventions. The complexity of designing formal interaction models necessitates careful consideration of factors like style, granularity, mathematical complexity, and measurability. Using content recommender systems as a case study the authors critically assess the emerging literature on formal interaction models in relation to various use-cases and design axes. They emphasize the importance of incorporating formal interaction models in the design or auditing of any AI system that interacts with users. Overall this paper calls for a more nuanced understanding of how AI systems and users co-evolve in shaping each other's behaviors and preferences within societal contexts. By leveraging formal interaction models researchers and practitioners can better navigate the complex dynamics inherent in human-AI interactions to create more ethical and effective AI technologies.
Created on 23 Jun. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.