DRAGIN: Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation based on the Information Needs of Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation Information Needs Real-time Adaptability Text Generation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation (DRAGIN) paradigm is crucial in text generation using Large Language Models (LLMs).
  • DRAGIN focuses on identifying the optimal moment to activate the retrieval module and crafting the appropriate query during text generation.
  • Existing dynamic RAG methods face challenges in deciding when to retrieve and what to retrieve, often relying on static rules and overlooking relevant information spanning across the entire context.
  • A new framework called DRAGIN has been introduced to address these limitations, making informed decisions based on real-time information requirements.
  • In evaluations over four knowledge-intensive generation datasets, DRAGIN outperformed existing methods across all tasks, showcasing its effectiveness.
  • The authors of DRAGIN include Weihang Su, Yichen Tang, Qingyao Ai, Zhijing Wu, and Yiqun Liu.
  • Their research paper delves into how DRAGIN revolutionizes text generation by dynamically adapting retrieval decisions for LLMs' evolving information needs.
  • All code, data, and models associated with DRAGIN are openly accessible on GitHub at https://github.com/oneal2000/DRAGIN/tree/main.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Weihang Su, Yichen Tang, Qingyao Ai, Zhijing Wu, Yiqun Liu

Abstract: Dynamic retrieval augmented generation (RAG) paradigm actively decides when and what to retrieve during the text generation process of Large Language Models (LLMs). There are two key elements of this paradigm: identifying the optimal moment to activate the retrieval module (deciding when to retrieve) and crafting the appropriate query once retrieval is triggered (determining what to retrieve). However, current dynamic RAG methods fall short in both aspects. Firstly, the strategies for deciding when to retrieve often rely on static rules. Moreover, the strategies for deciding what to retrieve typically limit themselves to the LLM's most recent sentence or the last few tokens, while the LLM's real-time information needs may span across the entire context. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a new framework, DRAGIN, i.e., Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation based on the real-time Information Needs of LLMs. Our framework is specifically designed to make decisions on when and what to retrieve based on the LLM's real-time information needs during the text generation process. We evaluate DRAGIN along with existing methods comprehensively over 4 knowledge-intensive generation datasets. Experimental results show that DRAGIN achieves superior performance on all tasks, demonstrating the effectiveness of our method. We have open-sourced all the code, data, and models in GitHub: https://github.com/oneal2000/DRAGIN/tree/main

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Mar. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2403.10081v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the realm of text generation using Large Language Models (LLMs), the Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation (DRAGIN) paradigm plays a crucial role in determining when and what information to retrieve during the generation process. This paradigm focuses on two key components: identifying the optimal moment to activate the retrieval module and crafting the appropriate query once retrieval is initiated. However, existing dynamic RAG methods face challenges in both areas. The strategies for deciding when to retrieve often rely on static rules, limiting their adaptability to real-time information needs. Additionally, the strategies for determining what to retrieve typically focus on recent sentences or tokens, overlooking the potential relevance of information spanning across the entire context. To address these limitations, a new framework called DRAGIN has been introduced. DRAGIN stands for Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation based on the Information Needs of LLMs and is specifically designed to make informed decisions on when and what to retrieve based on real-time information requirements during text generation. In an extensive evaluation over four knowledge-intensive generation datasets, DRAGIN outperformed existing methods across all tasks, showcasing its effectiveness in enhancing text generation processes. The authors of this innovative framework include Weihang Su, Yichen Tang, Qingyao Ai, Zhijing Wu, and Yiqun Liu. Their research paper titled "DRAGIN: Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation based on the Information Needs of Large Language Models" delves into how DRAGIN revolutionizes text generation by dynamically adapting retrieval decisions to meet LLMs' evolving information needs. The paper not only presents the theoretical underpinnings of DRAGIN but also provides empirical evidence through comprehensive experiments that validate its superior performance compared to existing methods. For those interested in exploring DRAGIN further or implementing it in their own projects, all code, data, and models associated with this framework have been made openly accessible on GitHub at https://github.com/oneal2000/DRAGIN/tree/main. This transparency underscores the authors' commitment to advancing research in dynamic retrieval augmented generation within the domain of Large Language Models.
Created on 07 Dec. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.