How do Machine Learning Projects use Continuous Integration Practices? An Empirical Study on GitHub Actions

AI-generated keywords: Continuous Integration Machine Learning GitHub CI Practices Research Methodology

AI-generated Key Points

  • Continuous Integration (CI) is a well-established practice in traditional software development
  • Application of CI practices in Machine Learning (ML) projects is relatively unexplored
  • Understanding how CI practices are implemented in ML projects is crucial due to the unique nature of ML development
  • Findings from analysis of 185 open-source projects on GitHub show differences in CI adoption between ML and non-ML projects
  • ML projects often have longer build durations and lower test coverage compared to non-ML projects, especially medium-sized ones
  • Small and medium-sized ML projects exhibit higher prevalence of increasing build duration trends compared to non-ML projects
  • Qualitative analysis focused on themes such as CI Build Execution and Status, CI Testing, and CI Infrastructure revealed unique challenges faced by ML projects in adopting CI practices effectively
  • Research methodology involved selecting 1,053 relevant ML and non-ML projects with GitHub Actions workflow configuration files from a curated dataset of 4,031 ML projects and 4,076 non-ML projects hosted on GitHub
  • Approximately 37% of ML projects have integrated a CI service into their workflow for tasks like software testing and building, but there is a knowledge gap regarding adoption patterns of CI practices within ML projects
  • Study aims to provide valuable insights for developing customized approaches for effectively adopting CI practices within the unique domain of Machine Learning
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: João Helis Bernardo, Daniel Alencar da Costa, Sérgio Queiroz de Medeiros, Uirá Kulesza

10 pages, Mining Software Repositories, MSR 2024
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: Continuous Integration (CI) is a well-established practice in traditional software development, but its nuances in the domain of Machine Learning (ML) projects remain relatively unexplored. Given the distinctive nature of ML development, understanding how CI practices are adopted in this context is crucial for tailoring effective approaches. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of 185 open-source projects on GitHub (93 ML and 92 non-ML projects). Our investigation comprises both quantitative and qualitative dimensions, aiming to uncover differences in CI adoption between ML and non-ML projects. Our findings indicate that ML projects often require longer build durations, and medium-sized ML projects exhibit lower test coverage compared to non-ML projects. Moreover, small and medium-sized ML projects show a higher prevalence of increasing build duration trends compared to their non-ML counterparts. Additionally, our qualitative analysis illuminates the discussions around CI in both ML and non-ML projects, encompassing themes like CI Build Execution and Status, CI Testing, and CI Infrastructure. These insights shed light on the unique challenges faced by ML projects in adopting CI practices effectively.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Mar. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2403.09547v1

Continuous Integration (CI) is a well-established practice in traditional software development. However, its application in Machine Learning (ML) projects remains relatively unexplored. Understanding how CI practices are implemented in ML projects is crucial for tailoring effective approaches due to the unique nature of ML development. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 185 open-source projects on GitHub to uncover differences in CI adoption between ML and non-ML projects. Our findings revealed that ML projects often have longer build durations and medium-sized ML projects exhibit lower test coverage compared to their non-ML counterparts. Additionally, small and medium-sized ML projects showed a higher prevalence of increasing build duration trends compared to non-ML projects. Through qualitative analysis, we explored discussions around CI in both ML and non-ML projects, focusing on themes such as CI Build Execution and Status, CI Testing, and CI Infrastructure. These insights shed light on the unique challenges faced by ML projects in effectively adopting CI practices. In our research methodology, we explained how we selected the studied projects from a curated dataset of 4,031 ML projects and 4,076 non-ML projects hosted on GitHub. By applying filters to the initial dataset, we narrowed down our selection to 1,053 projects with GitHub Actions workflow configuration files. This process allowed us to delve deeper into analyzing data from a subset of relevant ML and non-ML projects. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of CI in enabling more frequent software releases and emphasized specific CI practices employed by software projects beyond just adopting CI services. In the context of ML projects, approximately 37% have integrated a CI service into their workflow with common tasks including software testing and building. However, there remains a knowledge gap regarding adoption patterns of CI practices within ML projects. By addressing research questions related to how CI is applied and discussed by developers in the ML development domain, our study aims to contribute valuable insights that can guide the development of customized approaches for effectively adopting CI practices within this unique domain. Through our detailed analysis of project data and discussions surrounding CI practices in both ML and non-ML contexts, we aim to provide a nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities associated with implementing continuous integration in Machine Learning projects.
Created on 16 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.