Continuous Integration (CI) is a well-established practice in traditional software development. However, its application in Machine Learning (ML) projects remains relatively unexplored. Understanding how CI practices are implemented in ML projects is crucial for tailoring effective approaches due to the unique nature of ML development. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 185 open-source projects on GitHub to uncover differences in CI adoption between ML and non-ML projects. Our findings revealed that ML projects often have longer build durations and medium-sized ML projects exhibit lower test coverage compared to their non-ML counterparts. Additionally, small and medium-sized ML projects showed a higher prevalence of increasing build duration trends compared to non-ML projects. Through qualitative analysis, we explored discussions around CI in both ML and non-ML projects, focusing on themes such as CI Build Execution and Status, CI Testing, and CI Infrastructure. These insights shed light on the unique challenges faced by ML projects in effectively adopting CI practices. In our research methodology, we explained how we selected the studied projects from a curated dataset of 4,031 ML projects and 4,076 non-ML projects hosted on GitHub. By applying filters to the initial dataset, we narrowed down our selection to 1,053 projects with GitHub Actions workflow configuration files. This process allowed us to delve deeper into analyzing data from a subset of relevant ML and non-ML projects. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of CI in enabling more frequent software releases and emphasized specific CI practices employed by software projects beyond just adopting CI services. In the context of ML projects, approximately 37% have integrated a CI service into their workflow with common tasks including software testing and building. However, there remains a knowledge gap regarding adoption patterns of CI practices within ML projects. By addressing research questions related to how CI is applied and discussed by developers in the ML development domain, our study aims to contribute valuable insights that can guide the development of customized approaches for effectively adopting CI practices within this unique domain. Through our detailed analysis of project data and discussions surrounding CI practices in both ML and non-ML contexts, we aim to provide a nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities associated with implementing continuous integration in Machine Learning projects.
- - Continuous Integration (CI) is a well-established practice in traditional software development
- - Application of CI practices in Machine Learning (ML) projects is relatively unexplored
- - Understanding how CI practices are implemented in ML projects is crucial due to the unique nature of ML development
- - Findings from analysis of 185 open-source projects on GitHub show differences in CI adoption between ML and non-ML projects
- - ML projects often have longer build durations and lower test coverage compared to non-ML projects, especially medium-sized ones
- - Small and medium-sized ML projects exhibit higher prevalence of increasing build duration trends compared to non-ML projects
- - Qualitative analysis focused on themes such as CI Build Execution and Status, CI Testing, and CI Infrastructure revealed unique challenges faced by ML projects in adopting CI practices effectively
- - Research methodology involved selecting 1,053 relevant ML and non-ML projects with GitHub Actions workflow configuration files from a curated dataset of 4,031 ML projects and 4,076 non-ML projects hosted on GitHub
- - Approximately 37% of ML projects have integrated a CI service into their workflow for tasks like software testing and building, but there is a knowledge gap regarding adoption patterns of CI practices within ML projects
- - Study aims to provide valuable insights for developing customized approaches for effectively adopting CI practices within the unique domain of Machine Learning
Summary- Continuous Integration (CI) is a way of regularly combining and testing code in traditional software development.
- Using CI practices in Machine Learning (ML) projects is not common yet.
- It's important to understand how CI practices work in ML projects because ML development is different.
- Research shows that ML projects have longer build times and less test coverage than non-ML projects, especially medium-sized ones.
- Small and medium-sized ML projects often face challenges with increasing build times compared to non-ML projects.
DefinitionsContinuous Integration (CI): A method where code changes are frequently combined and tested together in software development.
Machine Learning (ML): A type of technology that allows computers to learn from data and improve their performance without being explicitly programmed.
Continuous Integration (CI) is a well-established practice in traditional software development, but its application in Machine Learning (ML) projects remains relatively unexplored. In order to understand how CI practices are implemented in ML projects and tailor effective approaches for this unique domain, a comprehensive analysis of 185 open-source projects on GitHub was conducted. The findings revealed differences in CI adoption between ML and non-ML projects, shedding light on the challenges faced by ML projects in effectively adopting CI practices.
The Study
In this study, researchers analyzed data from 4,031 ML projects and 4,076 non-ML projects hosted on GitHub. By applying filters to the initial dataset, they narrowed down their selection to 1,053 relevant projects with GitHub Actions workflow configuration files. This allowed for a deeper analysis of data from both ML and non-ML contexts.
Findings
The research found that ML projects often have longer build durations compared to non-ML counterparts. Additionally, medium-sized ML projects exhibit lower test coverage compared to their non-ML counterparts. Small and medium-sized ML projects also showed a higher prevalence of increasing build duration trends compared to non-ML projects.
Qualitative Analysis
Through qualitative analysis of discussions around CI in both ML and non-ML contexts, several themes emerged including CI Build Execution and Status, CI Testing, and CI Infrastructure. These insights shed light on the unique challenges faced by developers when implementing CI practices in the context of Machine Learning.
Importance of Continuous Integration
Previous studies have highlighted the importance of continuous integration in enabling more frequent software releases. However, there remains a knowledge gap regarding adoption patterns of specific CI practices within ML projects. This study aims to address this gap by providing valuable insights into how developers apply and discuss CI practices within the unique domain of Machine Learning development.
Challenges Faced by Machine Learning Projects
One major challenge identified through this research is longer build durations for ML project builds. This can be attributed to the complexity of ML algorithms and models, which require more time for testing and building. Additionally, medium-sized ML projects exhibit lower test coverage compared to non-ML projects, indicating a need for improved testing practices in this domain.
Opportunities for Improvement
Despite the challenges faced by ML projects in adopting CI practices, there are also opportunities for improvement. The research found that approximately 37% of ML projects have integrated a CI service into their workflow, with common tasks including software testing and building. This highlights the potential for further adoption and customization of CI practices within this domain.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the unique challenges faced by Machine Learning projects in effectively adopting continuous integration practices. By analyzing data from a curated dataset of relevant projects on GitHub and exploring discussions surrounding CI practices in both ML and non-ML contexts, this research sheds light on key differences between these domains and offers opportunities for improvement. As the field of Machine Learning continues to grow, it is crucial to understand how traditional software development practices can be adapted to suit its unique needs.