Measuring the Energy Consumption and Efficiency of Deep Neural Networks: An Empirical Analysis and Design Recommendations

AI-generated keywords: Energy consumption

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study focuses on energy consumption of large-scale neural networks, known as the "Red-AI" trend
  • BUTTER-E dataset introduced, covering data from 63,527 experimental runs across various configurations
  • Non-linear relationship found between energy efficiency and network design challenges traditional thinking
  • Importance of algorithm development considering cache effects for designing energy-efficient neural networks
  • Recommendations for optimizing software and hardware for more efficient AI task execution
  • Concrete action items outlined based on study findings to improve energy efficiency without compromising performance
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Charles Edison Tripp, Jordan Perr-Sauer, Jamil Gafur, Amabarish Nag, Avi Purkayastha, Sagi Zisman, Erik A. Bensen

25 pages, 8 figures, for associated dataset see https://data.openei.org/submissions/5991
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Addressing the so-called ``Red-AI'' trend of rising energy consumption by large-scale neural networks, this study investigates the actual energy consumption, as measured by node-level watt-meters, of training various fully connected neural network architectures. We introduce the BUTTER-E dataset, an augmentation to the BUTTER Empirical Deep Learning dataset, containing energy consumption and performance data from 63,527 individual experimental runs spanning 30,582 distinct configurations: 13 datasets, 20 sizes (number of trainable parameters), 8 network ``shapes'', and 14 depths on both CPU and GPU hardware collected using node-level watt-meters. This dataset reveals the complex relationship between dataset size, network structure, and energy use, and highlights the impact of cache effects. We propose a straightforward and effective energy model that accounts for network size, computing, and memory hierarchy. Our analysis also uncovers a surprising, hardware-mediated non-linear relationship between energy efficiency and network design, challenging the assumption that reducing the number of parameters or FLOPs is the best way to achieve greater energy efficiency. Highlighting the need for cache-considerate algorithm development, we suggest a combined approach to energy efficient network, algorithm, and hardware design. This work contributes to the fields of sustainable computing and Green AI, offering practical guidance for creating more energy-efficient neural networks and promoting sustainable AI.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Mar. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2403.08151v1

In the face of the escalating energy consumption of large-scale neural networks, commonly referred to as the "Red-AI" trend, this study delves into the actual energy usage during training of various fully connected neural network architectures. The research introduces the BUTTER-E dataset, an extension of the BUTTER Empirical Deep Learning dataset, which encompasses data from 63,527 individual experimental runs across 30,582 distinct configurations. These configurations span 13 datasets, 20 different sizes in terms of trainable parameters (NTPs), 8 network shapes, and 14 depths on both CPU and GPU hardware measured using node-level watt-meters. The sheds light on the intricate relationship between , , and , while emphasizing the impact of . A straightforward yet effective energy model is proposed in this study that takes into account network size, computing processes, and memory hierarchy. Surprisingly, a non-linear relationship between energy efficiency and network design is uncovered, challenging the notion that reducing parameters or FLOPs is always the best approach for achieving greater energy efficiency. The study underscores the necessity for algorithm development that considers cache effects and suggests a holistic approach to designing energy-efficient neural networks by integrating considerations for software algorithms and hardware design. As AI models continue to grow in complexity and energy costs soar, it becomes imperative to address these issues head-on through empirical measurement and analysis of algorithmic energy costs. Moving forward, further studies are recommended to explore deep learning architectures such as large language models (LLMs), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and graph neural networks (GNNs) to optimize both software and hardware for more efficient execution of AI tasks. Concrete action items are outlined based on the findings of this study including considerations for network sizing relative to system caches, avoiding wide layers with large input sizes that may lead to inefficient cache utilization, developing cache-aware deep learning approaches, distributing working sets efficiently among processing units to reduce idle time, advocating for larger caches in hardware design, and exploring methods for distributing parameter sets among multiple computing units. By integrating insights from this study into future algorithmic and hardware designs, there is potential to pave the way for more that do not compromise performance. This work represents a crucial step towards aligning rapid advancements in AI capabilities with efforts to mitigate escalating energy consumption associated with computing tasks.
Created on 06 Aug. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.