In the face of the escalating energy consumption of large-scale neural networks, commonly referred to as the "Red-AI" trend, this study delves into the actual energy usage during training of various fully connected neural network architectures. The research introduces the BUTTER-E dataset, an extension of the BUTTER Empirical Deep Learning dataset, which encompasses data from 63,527 individual experimental runs across 30,582 distinct configurations. These configurations span 13 datasets, 20 different sizes in terms of trainable parameters (NTPs), 8 network shapes, and 14 depths on both CPU and GPU hardware measured using node-level watt-meters. The sheds light on the intricate relationship between , , and , while emphasizing the impact of . A straightforward yet effective energy model is proposed in this study that takes into account network size, computing processes, and memory hierarchy. Surprisingly, a non-linear relationship between energy efficiency and network design is uncovered, challenging the notion that reducing parameters or FLOPs is always the best approach for achieving greater energy efficiency. The study underscores the necessity for algorithm development that considers cache effects and suggests a holistic approach to designing energy-efficient neural networks by integrating considerations for software algorithms and hardware design. As AI models continue to grow in complexity and energy costs soar, it becomes imperative to address these issues head-on through empirical measurement and analysis of algorithmic energy costs. Moving forward, further studies are recommended to explore deep learning architectures such as large language models (LLMs), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and graph neural networks (GNNs) to optimize both software and hardware for more efficient execution of AI tasks. Concrete action items are outlined based on the findings of this study including considerations for network sizing relative to system caches, avoiding wide layers with large input sizes that may lead to inefficient cache utilization, developing cache-aware deep learning approaches, distributing working sets efficiently among processing units to reduce idle time, advocating for larger caches in hardware design, and exploring methods for distributing parameter sets among multiple computing units. By integrating insights from this study into future algorithmic and hardware designs, there is potential to pave the way for more that do not compromise performance. This work represents a crucial step towards aligning rapid advancements in AI capabilities with efforts to mitigate escalating energy consumption associated with computing tasks.
- - Study focuses on energy consumption of large-scale neural networks, known as the "Red-AI" trend
- - BUTTER-E dataset introduced, covering data from 63,527 experimental runs across various configurations
- - Non-linear relationship found between energy efficiency and network design challenges traditional thinking
- - Importance of algorithm development considering cache effects for designing energy-efficient neural networks
- - Recommendations for optimizing software and hardware for more efficient AI task execution
- - Concrete action items outlined based on study findings to improve energy efficiency without compromising performance
Summary1. Scientists studied how much energy big brain-like computers use, called the "Red-AI" trend.
2. They made a new dataset called BUTTER-E with lots of information from different tests.
3. They found that saving energy in these computers is tricky because of how they are built.
4. It's important to think about how to make the computer program efficient for saving energy.
5. They have ideas on how to make these computers work better and save more energy.
Definitions- Energy consumption: How much power something uses up.
- Neural networks: Computer systems that work like human brains.
- Efficiency: Doing things well without wasting resources.
- Algorithm development: Creating step-by-step instructions for computers to follow.
- Cache effects: Storing data temporarily for quick access.
- Optimization: Making something as good as it can be.
In-Depth Analysis of Energy Consumption in Large-Scale Neural Networks
Neural networks have revolutionized the field of artificial intelligence (AI) and are now widely used for a variety of tasks, from image recognition to natural language processing. However, as these networks continue to grow in size and complexity, their energy consumption has become a major concern. This phenomenon, known as the "Red-AI" trend, has prompted researchers to investigate the actual energy usage during training of various fully connected neural network architectures.
In this study, published in the journal Neurocomputing, researchers introduce the BUTTER-E dataset – an extension of the BUTTER Empirical Deep Learning dataset – which includes data from over 63,000 individual experimental runs across 30,000 distinct configurations. These configurations cover 13 datasets, 20 different sizes in terms of trainable parameters (NTPs), 8 network shapes, and 14 depths on both CPU and GPU hardware measured using node-level watt-meters.
The goal of this research is to shed light on the intricate relationship between network design (represented by NTPs), computing processes (CPU vs GPU), and memory hierarchy while emphasizing the impact of energy efficiency. To achieve this goal, a straightforward yet effective energy model is proposed that takes into account all three factors: network size, computing processes, and memory hierarchy.
Surprisingly, this study uncovers a non-linear relationship between energy efficiency and network design. This challenges the common belief that reducing parameters or floating-point operations (FLOPs) is always the best approach for achieving greater energy efficiency. The results suggest that other factors such as cache effects must also be considered when designing efficient neural networks.
To address these issues head-on through empirical measurement and analysis of algorithmic energy costs, further studies are recommended to explore deep learning architectures such as large language models (LLMs), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and graph neural networks (GNNs). This will help optimize both software and hardware for more efficient execution of AI tasks.
Based on the findings of this study, concrete action items are outlined to guide future algorithmic and hardware designs. These include considerations for network sizing relative to system caches, avoiding wide layers with large input sizes that may lead to inefficient cache utilization, developing cache-aware deep learning approaches, distributing working sets efficiently among processing units to reduce idle time, advocating for larger caches in hardware design, and exploring methods for distributing parameter sets among multiple computing units.
By integrating insights from this study into future algorithmic and hardware designs, there is potential to pave the way for more energy-efficient neural networks that do not compromise performance. This work represents a crucial step towards aligning rapid advancements in AI capabilities with efforts to mitigate escalating energy consumption associated with computing tasks.
In conclusion, this research paper provides a comprehensive analysis of energy consumption in large-scale neural networks. It highlights the importance of considering factors beyond just network size or FLOPs when designing energy-efficient models. By bringing attention to these issues and providing actionable recommendations, this study contributes towards creating a more sustainable future for AI development.