Ensembling Prioritized Hybrid Policies for Multi-agent Pathfinding
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Recent advancements in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) for Multi-Agent Pathfinding (MAPF) emphasize the efficacy and scalability of communication-based approaches.
- A novel method called EPH has been introduced to address challenges in navigating structured environments with dense obstacles and numerous agents.
- EPH incorporates a selective communication block to enhance agent coordination by gathering more comprehensive information within multi-agent settings.
- The model is trained using a Q learning-based algorithm, which supports three advanced inference strategies aimed at optimizing performance during execution:
- Integration of neural policies with single-agent expert guidance for efficient navigation through conflict-free zones.
- Utilization of Q value-based methods to prioritize conflict resolution and handle deadlock situations effectively.
- Introduction of an ensemble method to select the most optimal solution from multiple possibilities.
- Empirical evaluations demonstrate that EPH performs competitively against state-of-the-art neural methods for MAPF in complex multi-agent environments.
- The research has been accepted for presentation at the 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2024).
- The code for EPH is open-source and available at https://github.com/ai4co/eph-mapf.
Authors: Huijie Tang, Federico Berto, Jinkyoo Park
Abstract: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) based Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) has recently gained attention due to its efficiency and scalability. Several MARL-MAPF methods choose to use communication to enrich the information one agent can perceive. However, existing works still struggle in structured environments with high obstacle density and a high number of agents. To further improve the performance of the communication-based MARL-MAPF solvers, we propose a new method, Ensembling Prioritized Hybrid Policies (EPH). We first propose a selective communication block to gather richer information for better agent coordination within multi-agent environments and train the model with a Q learning-based algorithm. We further introduce three advanced inference strategies aimed at bolstering performance during the execution phase. First, we hybridize the neural policy with single-agent expert guidance for navigating conflict-free zones. Secondly, we propose Q value-based methods for prioritized resolution of conflicts as well as deadlock situations. Finally, we introduce a robust ensemble method that can efficiently collect the best out of multiple possible solutions. We empirically evaluate EPH in complex multi-agent environments and demonstrate competitive performance against state-of-the-art neural methods for MAPF. We open-source our code at https://github.com/ai4co/eph-mapf.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.